Literature DB >> 22534054

Comparison of usefulness of Sokolow and Cornell criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy in subjects aged <20 years versus >30 years.

Alon Grossman1, Alex Prokupetz, Nira Koren-Morag, Ehud Grossman, Ari Shamiss.   

Abstract

The use of electrocardiography in sports or military screening is considered an effective tool for diagnosing potentially fatal conditions. The present study was designed to compare the yield of electrocardiographic criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) criteria for the diagnosis of LVH and hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy in subjects aged <20 years and >30 years. The association between the electrocardiographic (ECG) criteria for LVH (ECG-LVH) and echocardiographic findings was compared in 4 groups of air force academy candidates: (1) young candidates undergoing echocardiography because of ECG-LVH findings (n = 666); (2) young candidates without ECG-LVH findings undergoing routine echocardiography (n = 4,043); (3) older designated aviators undergoing echocardiography because of ECG-LVH findings (n = 196); and (4) older designated aviators undergoing routine echocardiography without ECG-LVH findings (n = 1,098). The predictive value of ECG-LVH findings for echocardiographic LVH, left ventricular mass, posterior wall thickness, and interventricular septal thickness were compared among the 4 groups. The ECG criteria in young subjects correlated with the left ventricular mass and posterior wall thickness but not with the interventricular septal thickness. In older subjects, these criteria correlated with left ventricular mass, interventricular septal, and posterior wall thickness. The positive and negative predictive value of ECG-LVH findings for the echocardiographic diagnosis of LVH in young subjects was 6.0% and 99.0%, respectively. In older subjects the positive and negative predictive value of ECG-LVH findings was 34% and 93%, respectively. In conclusion, ECG criteria are probably a useful tool for exclusion of LVH in young and older subjects; however, their low positive predictive value would probably lead to unnecessary echocardiographic tests, particularly in young subjects.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22534054     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.03.047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  7 in total

1.  A comparison of Cornell and Sokolow-Lyon electrocardiographic criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy in a military male population in Taiwan: the Cardiorespiratory fitness and HospItalization Events in armed Forces study.

Authors:  Fang-Ying Su; Yi-Hwei Li; Yen-Po Lin; Chung-Jen Lee; Chih-Hung Wang; Fan-Chun Meng; Yun-Shun Yu; Felicia Lin; Hsien-Tsai Wu; Gen-Min Lin
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-06

2.  Hypertension in Children and Adolescents: A Position Statement From a Panel of Multidisciplinary Experts Coordinated by the French Society of Hypertension.

Authors:  Béatrice Bouhanick; Philippe Sosner; Karine Brochard; Claire Mounier-Véhier; Geneviève Plu-Bureau; Sébastien Hascoet; Bruno Ranchin; Christine Pietrement; Laetitia Martinerie; Jean Marc Boivin; Jean Pierre Fauvel; Justine Bacchetta
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 3.418

3.  Models for improved diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy based on conventional electrocardiographic criteria.

Authors:  Nan Lu; Jin-Xiu Zhu; Pei-Xuan Yang; Xue-Rui Tan
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 2.298

4.  Validity of electrocardiographic criteria for increased left ventricular mass in young patients in the general population.

Authors:  Eduard Sklyar; Paul Ginelli; Aaron Barton; Richard Peralta; Jonathan N Bella
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2017-03-26

5.  How are ECG parameters related to cardiac magnetic resonance images? Electrocardiographic predictors of left ventricular hypertrophy and myocardial fibrosis in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Zsofia Dohy; Andras Vereckei; Viktor Horvath; Csilla Czimbalmos; Liliana Szabo; Attila Toth; Ferenc I Suhai; Ibolya Csecs; David Becker; Bela Merkely; Hajnalka Vago
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 1.468

6.  Clinical applicability and diagnostic performance of electrocardiographic criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy diagnosis in older adults.

Authors:  Caio de Assis Moura Tavares; Nelson Samesima; Ludhmila Abrahão Hajjar; Lucas C Godoy; Eduardo Messias Hirano Padrão; Felippe Lazar Neto; Mirella Facin; Wilson Jacob-Filho; Michael E Farkouh; Carlos Alberto Pastore
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Comparisons of traditional electrocardiographic criteria for left and right ventricular hypertrophy in young Asian women: The CHIEF heart study.

Authors:  Fang-Ying Su; Yen-Po Lin; Felicia Lin; Yun-Shun Yu; Younghoon Kwon; Henry Horng-Shing Lu; Gen-Min Lin
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 1.817

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.