| Literature DB >> 22533685 |
Sukma Oktavianthi1, Hidayat Trimarsanto, Clarissa A Febinia, Ketut Suastika, Made R Saraswati, Pande Dwipayana, Wibowo Arindrarto, Herawati Sudoyo, Safarina G Malik.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Uncoupling protein 2 (UCP2) gene polymorphisms have been reported as genetic risk factors for obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). We examined the association of commonly observed UCP2 G(-866)A (rs659366) and Ala55Val (C > T) (rs660339) single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with obesity, high fasting plasma glucose, and serum lipids in a Balinese population.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22533685 PMCID: PMC3412711 DOI: 10.1186/1475-2840-11-41
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cardiovasc Diabetol ISSN: 1475-2840 Impact factor: 9.951
Baseline characteristics of study subjects
| | | |||||
| Age | 46.0 ± 10.9 | 52.3 ± 16.8 | 46.3 ± 9.3 | 49.1 ± 11.5 | 0.073 | |
| FPG | 95.2 ± 25.2 | 97.1 ± 18.9 | 0.426 | 99.9 ± 43.7 | 94.9 ± 11.8 | 0.204 |
| BMI | 22.4 ± 1.9 | 20.7 ± 2.6 | 28.6 ± 3.5 | 27.9 ± 2.1 | 0.063 | |
| TGα | 126.4 ± 63.7 | 118.5 ± 53.8 | 0.344 | 160.1 ± 74.6 | 156.6 ± 69.8 | 0.882 |
| HDL-Cα | 53.2 ± 11.4 | 54.2 ± 13.9 | 0.698 | 48.1 ± 10.6 | 51.0 ± 9.8 | 0.054 |
| LDL-C | 119.6 ± 34.3 | 120.6 ± 29.6 | 0.781 | 119.4 ± 31.7 | 126.8 ± 34.9 | 0.127 |
| TC | 198.1 ± 38.2 | 196.3 ± 34.8 | 0.638 | 199.5 ± 36.1 | 211.0 ± 35.3 | |
| | | |||||
| Age | 46.7 ± 11.8 | 51.1 ± 17.0 | 46.1 ± 9.6 | 49.5 ± 10.7 | 0.088 | |
| FPG | 100.4 ± 30.4 | 98.2 ± 22.9 | 0.583 | 94.8 ± 24.9 | 96.1 ± 14.4 | 0.701 |
| BMI | 22.4 ± 1.7 | 20.8 ± 2.3 | 28.9 ± 3.7 | 28.2 ± 2.2 | 0.212 | |
| TGα | 140.2 ± 60.0 | 127.6 ± 54.3 | 0.125 | 176.5 ± 75.2 | 169.1 ± 62.4 | 0.735 |
| HDL-Cα | 50.1 ± 10.3 | 49.8 ± 11.2 | 0.850 | 44.7 ± 9.1 | 47.1 ± 7.7 | 0.113 |
| LDL-C | 123.2 ± 34.7 | 118.3 ± 29.3 | 0.487 | 122.2 ± 31.6 | 131.9 ± 33.8 | 0.126 |
| TC | 201.4 ± 37.9 | 191.5 ± 34.7 | 0.068 | 202.2 ± 36.6 | 216.6 ± 36.0 | |
| | | |||||
| Age | 45.4 ± 9.8 | 53.6 ± 16.5 | 46.7 ± 8.5 | 48.6 ± 12.6 | 0.452 | |
| FPG | 89.3 ± 16.1 | 96.1 ± 13.6 | 112.2 ± 69.5 | 93.6 ± 7.9 | 0.094 | |
| BMI | 22.4 ± 2.2 | 20.6 ± 2.9 | 28.1 ± 3.0 | 27.6 ± 1.9 | 0.364 | |
| TGα | 110.8 ± 64.6 | 108.9 ± 51.7 | 0.500 | 121.2 ± 57.6 | 142.2 ± 75.7 | 0.265 |
| HDL-Cα | 56.7 ± 11.7 | 58.7 ± 15.1 | 0.472 | 56.3 ± 9.2 | 55.5 ± 10.2 | 0.612 |
| LDL-C | 115.6 ± 33.7 | 123.0 ± 29.8 | 0.139 | 112.7 ± 30.6 | 121.0 ± 35.7 | 0.279 |
| TC | 194.4 ± 38.5 | 201.3 ± 34.3 | 0.231 | 193.1 ± 34.4 | 204.9 ± 33.9 | 0.137 |
Criteria: Obese BMI ≥25 kg/m2[34], High FPG (≥126 mg/dL) [36], high TG (>200 mg/dL), low HDL-C (<40 mg/dL), high LDL-C (≥ 160 mg/dL), high TC (≥240 mg/dL) [37]. Data were presented as means ± SD. Statistical comparisons were calculated between the urban and rural populations in each category, continuous variables were compared using the Welch’s t-test, α Due to skew data distribution, comparisons of TG and HDL were calculated using Mann–Whitney U-test. Significant p values were in bold.
Genotypic and allelic distributions of rs659366 and rs659366 in non-obese and obese subjects
| | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non Obese | | 72 | 128 | | 64 | 122 | | |||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | G/G | 0.40 | 0.29 | 0.065 | 0.36 | 0.23 | 0.055 | 0.45 | 0.34 | 0.177 |
| | G/A | 0.46 | 0.53 | | 0.54 | 0.56 | | 0.36 | 0.50 | |
| | A/A | 0.14 | 0.18 | | 0.10 | 0.20 | | 0.19 | 0.16 | |
| | MAF (−866)A | 0.37 | 0.45 | | 0.37 | 0.48 | | 0.37 | 0.41 | |
| | Heterozygosity | 0.47 | 0.50 | | 0.47 | 0.50 | | 0.47 | 0.48 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | C/C | 0.53 | 0.39 | 0.50 | 0.34 | 0.56 | 0.44 | 0.265 | ||
| | C/T | 0.36 | 0.43 | | 0.42 | 0.45 | | 0.30 | 0.41 | |
| | T/T | 0.11 | 0.18 | | 0.08 | 0.20 | | 0.14 | 0.15 | |
| | MAF 55Val | 0.29 | 0.39 | | 0.29 | 0.43 | | 0.29 | 0.35 | |
| | Heterozygosity | 0.41 | 0.48 | | 0.42 | 0.49 | | 0.41 | 0.46 | |
| Obese | | | | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | G/G | 0.27 | 0.29 | 0.585 | 0.28 | 0.28 | 0.968 | 0.24 | 0.31 | 0.151 |
| | G/A | 0.54 | 0.57 | | 0.54 | 0.52 | | 0.55 | 0.63 | |
| | A/A | 0.19 | 0.13 | | 0.18 | 0.20 | | 0.21 | 0.06 | |
| | MAF (−866)A | 0.46 | 0.42 | | 0.45 | 0.46 | | 0.49 | 0.37 | |
| | Heterozygosity | 0.50 | 0.49 | | 0.50 | 0.50 | | 0.51 | 0.47 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | C/C | 0.38 | 0.41 | 0.513 | 0.40 | 0.40 | 0.227 | 0.33 | 0.43 | 0.685 |
| | C/T | 0.54 | 0.47 | | 0.52 | 0.42 | | 0.57 | 0.51 | |
| | T/T | 0.08 | 0.12 | | 0.08 | 0.18 | | 0.10 | 0.06 | |
| | MAF 55Val | 0.35 | 0.35 | | 0.34 | 0.39 | | 0.38 | 0.31 | |
| Heterozygosity | 0.46 | 0.46 | 0.45 | 0.48 | 0.48 | 0.44 | ||||
Obese criteria: BMI ≥25 kg/m2[34]. Statistical comparisons were calculated between the urban and rural populations in each category: genetic profiles were compared using Fisher’s exact test on 2x3 contingency table. Significant p values were in bold.
Association of genotypes with disease traits
| G/A | −0.03 | 0.934 | 0.28 | 0.473 | 0.44 | 0.157 | −0.39 | 0.136 | −0.29 | 0.220 | −0.09 | 0.702 |
| A/A | −0.44 | 0.305 | 0.16 | 0.755 | 0.26 | 0.521 | −0.36 | 0.309 | −0.31 | 0.308 | −0.21 | 0.521 |
| Age | −0.01 | 0.245 | 0.04 | −0.01 | 0.084 | 0.01 | 0.141 | 0.01 | 0.02 | |||
| Male | 0.44 | 0.28 | 0.284 | 0.91 | −1.44 | 0.24 | 0.117 | 0.20 | 0.211 | |||
| Urban | 0.69 | 0.12 | 0.806 | 0.436 | 0.204 | −0.50 | 0.103 | 0.06 | 0.832 | 0.07 | 0.795 | |
| G/A-urban | 0.57 | 0.161 | −0.11 | 0.853 | −0.11 | 0.782 | 0.34 | 0.377 | −0.33 | 0.333 | −0.25 | 0.480 |
| A/A-urban | 1.20 | 0.58 | 0.438 | −0.28 | 0.618 | 0.61 | 0.236 | 0.18 | 0.682 | 0.23 | 0.625 | |
| | ||||||||||||
| C/T | −0.05 | 0.859 | −0.11 | 0.756 | 0.46 | 0.123 | −0.19 | 0.446 | −0.11 | 0.629 | 0.08 | 0.737 |
| T/T | −0.55 | 0.195 | −0.03 | 0.945 | 0.26 | 0.488 | −0.08 | 0.811 | −0.25 | 0.391 | −0.11 | 0.741 |
| Age | −0.01 | 0.222 | 0.04 | −0.01 | 0.103 | 0.01 | 0.133 | 0.02 | 0.02 | |||
| Male | 0.43 | 0.30 | 0.254 | 0.90 | −1.45 | 0.21 | 0.158 | 0.19 | 0.249 | |||
| Urban | 0.73 | 0.04 | 0.787 | 0.46 | 0.113 | −0.30 | 0.268 | −0.09 | 0.701 | 0.02 | 0.931 | |
| C/T-urban | 0.77 | −0.04 | 0.945 | −0.12 | 0.760 | 0.11 | 0.771 | −0.04 | 0.914 | −0.09 | 0.787 | |
| T/T-urban | 0.70 | 0.253 | 0.57 | 0.452 | −0.87 | 0.167 | 0.35 | 0.528 | 0.35 | 0.469 | 0.11 | 0.826 |
Logistic regression analyses of genotypes association with disease traits, adjusted for age, gender, and population (urban/rural). Criteria: Obesity (BMI ≥25 kg/m2) [34], high FPG (≥126 mg/dL) [36], high TG (200–499 mg/dL), low HDL-C (<40 mg/dL), high LDL-C (≥ 160 mg/dL), high TC (≥240 mg/dL) [37]. Significant p values obtained from Wald test were in bold.
Association of UCP2 haplotypes with disease traits
| GC | 0.56 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| AC | 0.09 | −0.05 | 0.902 | 0.82 | 0.280 | −0.23 | 0.696 | −0.58 | 0.325 | −0.48 | 0.461 | −0.65 | 0.315 |
| AT | 0.34 | −0.21 | 0.312 | 0.33 | 0.444 | 0.11 | 0.676 | −0.37 | 0.211 | 0.00 | 0.996 | 0.21 | 0.379 |
| GT | 0.01 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Age | | −0.01 | 0.222 | 0.05 | −0.02 | 0.109 | 0.01 | 0.335 | 0.02 | 0.086 | 0.01 | ||
| Male | | 0.46 | 0.55 | 0.155 | 0.80 | −1.89 | 0.22 | 0.419 | 0.25 | 0.310 | |||
| Urban | | 0.74 | 0.89 | 0.218 | 0.10 | 0.805 | 0.90 | 0.053 | 0.62 | 0.135 | 0.46 | 0.247 | |
| AC-urban | | 0.24 | 0.643 | 0.19 | 0.835 | 0.98 | 0.160 | 0.97 | 0.191 | −0.44 | 0.612 | −0.04 | 0.960 |
| AT-urban | | 0.61 | 0.18 | 0.745 | −0.04 | 0.912 | 0.49 | 0.228 | −0.40 | 0.329 | −0.42 | 0.261 | |
| GT-urban | | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| | | ||||||||||||
| GC | 0.56 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| AC | 0.09 | 0.05 | 0.900 | 0.77 | 0.341 | −0.19 | 0.761 | −0.60 | 0.336 | −0.49 | 0.465 | −0.64 | 0.337 |
| AT | 0.34 | −0.14 | 0.644 | 0.26 | 0.701 | 0.18 | 0.644 | −0.50 | 0.303 | −0.05 | 0.882 | 0.28 | 0.450 |
| GT | 0.01 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Age | | −0.01 | 0.234 | 0.05 | −0.01 | 0.112 | 0.01 | 0.323 | 0.02 | 0.100 | 0.02 | ||
| Male | | 0.46 | 0.53 | 0.168 | 0.80 | −1.89 | 0.22 | 0.403 | 0.25 | 0.309 | |||
| Urban | | 0.67 | 1.04 | 0.155 | −0.08 | 0.852 | 0.72 | 0.171 | 0.54 | 0.228 | 0.41 | 0.341 | |
| AC-urban | | 0.18 | 0.739 | 0.09 | 0.927 | 1.04 | 0.146 | 0.89 | 0.247 | −0.38 | 0.668 | 0.00 | 1.000 |
| AT-urban | | 0.89 | −0.01 | 0.987 | 0.24 | 0.637 | 0.34 | 0.577 | −0.33 | 0.548 | −0.46 | 0.383 | |
| GT-urban | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | |
Logistic regression analysis for association of UCP2 haplotypes with diseases traits, assuming the additive and dominant genetic models, adjusted for age, gender, and population (urban/rural). Significant p values from Wald test were in bold. Analysis for a recessive model was not feasible due to low frequency of rare haplotype (<5%). Criteria: Obesity (high BMI ≥25 kg/m2) [34], High FPG (≥126 mg/dL) [36], high TG (200–499 mg/dL), low HDL-C (<40 mg/dL), high LDL-C (≥ 160 mg/dL), high TC (≥240 mg/dL) [37]. f: haplotype frequencies. NA: not available, data were omitted due to low haplotype frequencies (<5%).