| Literature DB >> 22531448 |
Stacey Spencer1, Deidra Bethea, T Shantha Raju, Jill Giles-Komar, Yiqing Feng.
Abstract
The successful development of antibody therapeutics depends on the molecules having properties that are suitable for manufacturing, as well as use by patients. Because high solubility is a desirable property for antibodies, screening for solubility has become an essential step during the early candidate selection process. In considering the screening process, we formed a hypothesis that hybridoma antibodies are filtered by nature to possess high solubility and tested this hypothesis using a large number of murine hybridoma-derived antibodies. Using the cross-interaction chromatography (CIC) method, we screened the solubility of 92 murine hybridoma-derived monoclonal antibodies and found that all of these molecules exhibited CIC profiles that are indicative of high solubility (> 100mg/mL). Further investigations revealed that variable region N-linked glycosylation or isoelectric parameters are unlikely to contribute to the high solubility of these antibodies. These results support the general hypothesis that hybridoma monoclonal antibodies are highly soluble.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22531448 PMCID: PMC3355482 DOI: 10.4161/mabs.19869
Source DB: PubMed Journal: MAbs ISSN: 1942-0862 Impact factor: 5.857

Figure 1. Representative murine hybridoma antibody CIC profiles on murine polyclonal IgG coupled column. Peak height differences are due to injection concentration variances (range 0.05–0.20 mg/mL).
Table 1. Retention factor k’ and pI of murine mAb derived from hybridoma
| 1 | 0.01 ± 0.02 | | 7.2 |
| 2 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 7.2 |
| 3 | -0.02 ± 0.04 | 0.00 | N.D. |
| 4 | 0.02 | | 7.1 |
| 5 | 0.01 ± 0.01 | | 7.1 |
| 6 | 0.00 | | 7.3 |
| 0.02 | | N.D. | |
| 0.00 | | N.D. | |
| 9 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | | 7.7 |
| 10 | 0.00 | | 7.3 |
| 11 | 0.01 ± 0.03 | | N.D. |
| 12 | 0.01 ± 0.01 | | 7.2 |
| 13 | 0.02 ± 0.04 | | 5.9 |
| 14 | 0.01 ± 0.02 | | 7.0 |
| 15 | 0.01 ± 0.01 | | N.D. |
| 16 | 0.00 | | N.D. |
| 17 | 0.03 ± 0.01 | | 8.3 |
| 18 | 0.18 | | 6.5 |
| 19 | -0.01 ± 0.06 | | N.D. |
| 0.04 | | N.D. | |
| 21 | 0.01 ± 0.01 | | 7.2 |
| 22 | 0.11 ± 0.15 | 0.05 | 7.2 |
| 23 | 0.03 ± 0.01 | | 7.3 |
| 24 | 0.09 | | 7.0 |
| 25 | 0.02 ± 0.01 | | 7.4 |
| 26 | 0.16 | 0.13 | N.D. |
| 27 | 0.01 ± 0.00 | | 7.0 |
| 0.09 | | N.D. | |
| 29 | 0.13 | 0.15 | 6.9 |
| 30 | 0.00 | | N.D. |
| 0.00 | | N.D. | |
| 0.00 | | N.D. | |
| 33 | 0.05 ± 0.01 | 0.06 | 6.9 |
| 0.09 | | N.D. | |
| 35 | 0.04 | 0.05 | N.D. |
| 36 | 0.01 ± 0.03 | | 7.2 |
| 37 | 0.00 | | 8.0 |
| 38 | 0.07 | | N.D. |
| 0.00 ± 0.00 | | N.D. | |
| 40 | 0.02 ± 0.01 | | 6.9 |
| 41 | 0.04 | | N.D. |
| 42 | 0.06 ± 0.03 | | 7.0 |
| 43 | 0.00 ± 0.03 | | N.D. |
| 44 | 0.05 | | N.D. |
| 0.00 | | 7.4 | |
| 46 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | | 7.4 |
| 47 | 0.12 ± 0.02 | | 7.7 |
| 48 | 0.00 | | 7.2 |
| 49 | 0.09 ± 0.01 | | 7.3 |
| 0.04 | | N.D. | |
| 51 | 0.04 ± 0.01 | | 7.6 |
| 52 | 0.04 ± 0.00 | | 6.9 |
| 53 | 0.03 ± 0.01 | 0.00 | N.D. |
| 54 | 0.16 | | N.D. |
| 55 | 0.00 ± 0.04 | | 7.1 |
| 56 | 0.04 | | N.D. |
| 57 | 0.04 ± 0.01 | | 7.4 |
| 58 | 0.03 | | N.D. |
| 0.01 | | 7.3 | |
| 60 | 0.01 ± 0.01 | | N.D. |
| 61 | 0.06 ± 0.01 | | N.D. |
| 62 | 0.06 ± 0.01 | | 7.6 |
| 0.07 ± 0.10 | | 7.6 | |
| 0.06 | | N.D. | |
| 65 | 0.00 | | 7.7 |
| 66 | 0.04 ± 0.06 | | 6.9 |
| 67 | 0.03 ± 0.04 | 0.11 | 5.8 |
| 68 | 0.02 ± 0.03 | | 7.0 |
| 0.04 | | N.D. | |
| 0.08 | | N.D. | |
| 71 | 0.02 ± 0.03 | 0.05 | 7.8 |
| 0.12 | | N.D. | |
| 73 | 0.03 | | N.D. |
| 0.03 | | N.D. | |
| 75 | 0.01 | | 7.0 |
| 76 | 0.03 ± 0.04 | | 8.3 |
| 0.07 | | N.D. | |
| 0.13 | | N.D. | |
| 0.03 | | 7.2 | |
| 80 | 0.04 | | 6.9 |
| 0.07 | | N.D. | |
| 82 | 0.02 ± 0.02 | | N.D. |
| 0.05 | | N.D. | |
| 0.04 | | N.D. | |
| 85 | 0.03 | | 6.6 |
| 0.04 | | N.D. | |
| 87 | 0.05 ± 0.04 | 0.00 | N.D. |
| -0.02 | | N.D. | |
| 0.09 | | 6.9 | |
| 0.01 | | 5.5 | |
| -0.01 | | 6.2 | |
| -0.03 | 5.5 |
1Samples with italic numbers were not subject to MALDI-TOF-MS analysis; Samples 89–92 have V-region sequences available and do not contain consensus N-linked glycosylation site; for the antibodies identified to contain V-region glycosylation, the retention factors (k’) upon deglycosylation are listed. 2The errors are calculated from n = 2 chromatographic experiments
Table 2. DLS measurements of a selective set of murine hybridoma mAb
| 62 | 5.5 | 17 | 100 |
| 63 | 5.2 | 14 | 100 |
| 65 | 5.1 | 13 | 100 |
| 66 | 5.3 | 13 | 100 |
| 67 | 5.4 | 11 | 99 |
| 68 | 5.3 | 12 | 100 |
| 71 | 5.5 | 19 | 100 |
| 75 | 4.7 | 7 | 98 |
| 76 | 4.7 | 10 | 97 |
| 79 | 4.8 | 10 | 100 |
| 80 | 5.1 | 16 | 100 |
| 85 | 5.0 | 13 | 100 |
| 89 | 4.7 | 20 | 100 |
| 90 | 4.7 | 7 | 100 |

Figure 2. Comparison of MALDI-TOF-MS spectra before and after deglycosylation. (A) intact mAb 17 and (B) deglycosylated mAb 17; (C) intact mAb 3 and (D) deglycosylated mAb 3. +1 is singly charged molecular ion, +2 is doubly charged molecular ion, +3 is triply charged molecular ion and LC is free light chain.