Literature DB >> 22530385

How places matter: telecare technologies and the changing spatial dimensions of healthcare.

Nelly Oudshoorn1.   

Abstract

Dominant discourses on telecare technologies often celebrate the erasure of distance and place. This paper provides a critical intervention into these discourses by investigating how spaces still matter, despite the move from physical to virtual encounters between healthcare professionals and patients. I argue that science and technology studies (STS) research on telecare, as well as other technologies, can be enriched by including a focus on place to understand the dynamic interactions between people and things. Adopting insights of human geographers, I show how places in which technologies are used affect how technologies enable or constrain human actions and identities. Whereas some spaces may facilitate the incorporation of technologies, others may resist technologies. A focus on how places matter is important for understanding how telecare technologies reorder and redefine healthcare. Although other healthcare technologies are also important actors in transforming healthcare, telecare technologies do this in a very specific way: they redefine the spatial dimensions of healthcare. To capture and further explore this changing spatial configuration of healthcare, I introduce the notion of technogeography of care. This concept provides a useful heuristic to study how places matter in healthcare. Although telecare technologies introduce virtual encounters between healthcare providers and patients, the use of telecare devices still largely depends on locally grounded, situated care acts. Based on interviews with users of several cardiac telecare applications, including healthcare professionals and patients in Germany and The Netherlands, the paper shows how patients' homes and public spaces are important for shaping the implementation and use of telecare technologies, and vice versa. Last, but not least, telecare devices are implicated as well. The paper emphasizes the place-dependency of the use and meaning of technical devices by showing how the same technological device can do and mean different things in different places.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22530385     DOI: 10.1177/0306312711431817

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Stud Sci        ISSN: 0306-3127            Impact factor:   3.885


  28 in total

Review 1.  Implementing telemonitoring in heart failure care: barriers from the perspectives of patients, healthcare professionals and healthcare organizations.

Authors:  Josiane J J Boyne; Hubertus J M Vrijhoef
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2013-09

2.  User-centered design of a scalable, electronic health record-integrated remote symptom monitoring intervention for patients with asthma and providers in primary care.

Authors:  Robert S Rudin; Sofia Perez; Jorge A Rodriguez; Jessica Sousa; Savanna Plombon; Adriana Arcia; Dinah Foer; David W Bates; Anuj K Dalal
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2021-10-12       Impact factor: 7.942

3.  mHealth approaches to child obesity prevention: successes, unique challenges, and next directions.

Authors:  Eleanor B Tate; Donna Spruijt-Metz; Gillian O'Reilly; Maryalice Jordan-Marsh; Marientina Gotsis; Mary Ann Pentz; Genevieve F Dunton
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  The organising vision for telehealth and telecare: discourse analysis.

Authors:  Trisha Greenhalgh; Rob Procter; Joe Wherton; Paul Sugarhood; Sara Shaw
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Expectations in the field of the internet and health: an analysis of claims about social networking sites in clinical literature.

Authors:  Nelya Koteyko; Daniel Hunt; Barrie Gunter
Journal:  Sociol Health Illn       Date:  2015-03

6.  What is quality in assisted living technology? The ARCHIE framework for effective telehealth and telecare services.

Authors:  Trisha Greenhalgh; Rob Procter; Joe Wherton; Paul Sugarhood; Sue Hinder; Mark Rouncefield
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 8.775

Review 7.  The Personal Emergency Response System as a Technology Innovation in Primary Health Care Services: An Integrative Review.

Authors:  Randi Stokke
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 5.428

8.  Exploring engagement with digital screens for collecting patient feedback in clinical waiting rooms: The role of touch and place.

Authors:  Bie Nio Ong; Caroline Sanders
Journal:  Health (London)       Date:  2019-12-09

9.  SCALS: a fourth-generation study of assisted living technologies in their organisational, social, political and policy context.

Authors:  Trisha Greenhalgh; Sara Shaw; Joe Wherton; Gemma Hughes; Jenni Lynch; Christine A'Court; Sue Hinder; Nick Fahy; Emma Byrne; Alexander Finlayson; Tom Sorell; Rob Procter; Rob Stones
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Virtual online consultations: advantages and limitations (VOCAL) study.

Authors:  Trisha Greenhalgh; Shanti Vijayaraghavan; Joe Wherton; Sara Shaw; Emma Byrne; Desirée Campbell-Richards; Satya Bhattacharya; Philippa Hanson; Seendy Ramoutar; Charles Gutteridge; Isabel Hodkinson; Anna Collard; Joanne Morris
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.