Literature DB >> 22528873

Adding the goal to learn strengthens learning in an unintentional learning task.

James R Schmidt1, Jan De Houwer.   

Abstract

Previous research has demonstrated that contingency learning can take place in the absence of the intention to learn. For instance, in the color-word contingency learning task, each distracting word is presented most often in a given target color (e.g., "month" in red and "plate" in green), and less often in the other colors. Participants respond more quickly and accurately when the word is presented in the expected rather than an unexpected color, even though there is no reason why they would have the intention to learn the contingencies between the words and the colors. It remains to be determined, however, whether learning in such situations would benefit or suffer from adding the goal to learn contingencies. In the reported experiment, half of the participants were informed that each word was presented most often in a certain color, and they were instructed to try to learn these contingencies. The other half of the participants were not informed that contingencies would be present. The participants given the learning goal produced a larger response time contingency effect than did the control participants. In contrast to some results from other learning paradigms, these results suggest that intentional learning adds to, rather than interferes with, unintentional learning, and we propose an explanation for some of the conflicting results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22528873     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-012-0255-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  16 in total

1.  When all is revealed: a dissociation between evaluative learning and contingency awareness.

Authors:  E P Fulcher; M Hammerl
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2001-12

2.  Selective attention modulates implicit learning.

Authors:  Y Jiang; M M Chun
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2001-11

3.  Does temporal contiguity moderate contingency learning in a speeded performance task?

Authors:  James R Schmidt; Jan De Houwer
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 2.143

4.  Contingency learning and unlearning in the blink of an eye: a resource dependent process.

Authors:  James R Schmidt; Jan De Houwer; Derek Besner
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2010-01-29

5.  Goal relevance and artificial grammar learning.

Authors:  Baruch Eitam; Yaacov Schul; Ran R Hassin
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 2.143

6.  Instruction effects in implicit artificial grammar learning: a preference for grammaticality.

Authors:  Christian Forkstam; Asa Elwér; Martin Ingvar; Karl Magnus Petersson
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-05-13       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  The Stroop effect: why proportion congruent has nothing to do with congruency and everything to do with contingency.

Authors:  James R Schmidt; Derek Besner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Intentional versus unintentional use of contingencies between perceptual events.

Authors:  K A Carlson; J H Flowers
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-04

9.  Spatial attention and implicit sequence learning: evidence for independent learning of spatial and nonspatial sequences.

Authors:  U Mayr
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Contingency learning with evaluative stimuli: testing the generality of contingency learning in a performance paradigm.

Authors:  James R Schmidt; Jan De Houwer
Journal:  Exp Psychol       Date:  2012
View more
  4 in total

1.  Relative speed of processing determines color-word contingency learning.

Authors:  Noah D Forrin; Colin M MacLeod
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-10

Review 2.  Questioning conflict adaptation: proportion congruent and Gratton effects reconsidered.

Authors:  James R Schmidt
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-08

3.  Best not to bet on the horserace: A comment on Forrin and MacLeod (2017) and a relevant stimulus-response compatibility view of colour-word contingency learning asymmetries.

Authors:  James R Schmidt
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-02

4.  Disentangling semantic and response learning effects in color-word contingency learning.

Authors:  Sebastian Geukes; Dirk Vorberg; Pienie Zwitserlood
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.