C M Witt1, F Martins, S N Willich, L Schützler. 1. Institute for Social Medicine, Epidemiology, and Health Economics, Charité University Medical Center, Berlin, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients' expectations of acupuncture treatment have widely been investigated; however, little focus has been on the physicians' expectations. We aimed to investigate (1) which patient characteristics lead to different expectations of physicians, and (2) whether physicians' expectations predict pain reduction and physical functioning in acupuncture and usual care treatment for chronic pain. METHODS: In four large multi-centre, randomized trials patients with chronic pain were randomized to receive usual care alone or 10 additional acupuncture treatments. Data were pooled. Baseline characteristics of the three expectation groups were compared, and the physicians' expectation and its interaction with the treatment group were included in two linear regression models predicting pain reduction and change in physical functioning. Other patient characteristics were included for adjustment. RESULTS:9900 patients treated by 2781 physicians were analysed. Age, education and disease-related variables differed in the expectation groups. There was no interaction between treatment group and expectation. Patients, for whom the physicians had expected substantial improvement, showed more pain reduction (p < 0.001) and better physical functioning (p < 0.001) than patients for whom moderate improvement was expected. No significant differences were found between expected moderate and expected lack of success. However, the proportion of explained variance that was due to physicians' expectations was small considering total explained variance. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians' high expectations at baseline predict better outcome, independent of the treatment. Since we adjusted for several patient variables including duration and severity of disease, this cannot be explained by prognostic factors only. Other explanations are discussed and recommended for future research.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Patients' expectations of acupuncture treatment have widely been investigated; however, little focus has been on the physicians' expectations. We aimed to investigate (1) which patient characteristics lead to different expectations of physicians, and (2) whether physicians' expectations predict pain reduction and physical functioning in acupuncture and usual care treatment for chronic pain. METHODS: In four large multi-centre, randomized trials patients with chronic pain were randomized to receive usual care alone or 10 additional acupuncture treatments. Data were pooled. Baseline characteristics of the three expectation groups were compared, and the physicians' expectation and its interaction with the treatment group were included in two linear regression models predicting pain reduction and change in physical functioning. Other patient characteristics were included for adjustment. RESULTS: 9900 patients treated by 2781 physicians were analysed. Age, education and disease-related variables differed in the expectation groups. There was no interaction between treatment group and expectation. Patients, for whom the physicians had expected substantial improvement, showed more pain reduction (p < 0.001) and better physical functioning (p < 0.001) than patients for whom moderate improvement was expected. No significant differences were found between expected moderate and expected lack of success. However, the proportion of explained variance that was due to physicians' expectations was small considering total explained variance. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians' high expectations at baseline predict better outcome, independent of the treatment. Since we adjusted for several patient variables including duration and severity of disease, this cannot be explained by prognostic factors only. Other explanations are discussed and recommended for future research.
Authors: Joel E Bialosky; Steven Z George; Maggie E Horn; Donald D Price; Roland Staud; Michael E Robinson Journal: J Pain Date: 2013-10-27 Impact factor: 5.820
Authors: Robert R Edwards; Robert H Dworkin; Dennis C Turk; Martin S Angst; Raymond Dionne; Roy Freeman; Per Hansson; Simon Haroutounian; Lars Arendt-Nielsen; Nadine Attal; Ralf Baron; Joanna Brell; Shay Bujanover; Laurie B Burke; Daniel Carr; Amy S Chappell; Penney Cowan; Mila Etropolski; Roger B Fillingim; Jennifer S Gewandter; Nathaniel P Katz; Ernest A Kopecky; John D Markman; George Nomikos; Linda Porter; Bob A Rappaport; Andrew S C Rice; Joseph M Scavone; Joachim Scholz; Lee S Simon; Shannon M Smith; Jeffrey Tobias; Tina Tockarshewsky; Christine Veasley; Mark Versavel; Ajay D Wasan; Warren Wen; David Yarnitsky Journal: Pain Date: 2016-09 Impact factor: 7.926
Authors: Katherine Bradbury; Miznah Al-Abbadey; Dawn Carnes; Borislav D Dimitrov; Susan Eardley; Carol Fawkes; Jo Foster; Maddy Greville-Harris; J Matthew Harvey; Janine Leach; George Lewith; Hugh MacPherson; Lisa Roberts; Laura Parry; Lucy Yardley; Felicity L Bishop Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2016-05-27 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Felicity L Bishop; Beverly Coghlan; Adam Wa Geraghty; Hazel Everitt; Paul Little; Michelle M Holmes; Dionysis Seretis; George Lewith Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2017-06-30 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Samantha M Meints; Robert R Edwards; Christopher Gilligan; Kristin L Schreiber Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2020-05-20 Impact factor: 6.558
Authors: Marko Nedeljkovic; Christina Bürgler; Petra H Wirtz; Roland Seiler; Konrad M Streitberger; Brigitte Ausfeld-Hafter Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med Date: 2012-11-13 Impact factor: 2.629
Authors: Vincent C H Chung; Benjamin H K Yip; Ellen L M Yu; Siya Liu; Robin S T Ho; Regina W S Sit; Albert W N Leung; Justin C Y Wu; Samuel Y S Wong Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 1.889