BACKGROUND: Many patient education materials (PEMs) available on the internet are written at high school or college reading levels, rendering them inaccessible to the average US resident, who reads at or below an 8(th) grade level. Currently, electronic health record (EHR) providers partner with companies that produce PEMs, allowing clinicians to access PEMs at the point of care. OBJECTIVE: To assess the readability of PEMs provided by a popular EHR vendor as well as the National Library of Medicine (NLM). DESIGN: We included PEMs from Micromedex, EBSCO, and MedlinePlus. Micromedex and EBSCO supply PEMs to Meditech, a popular EHR supplier in the US. MedlinePlus supplies the NLM. These PEM databases have high market penetration and accessibility. MEASUREMENTS: Grade reading level of the PEMs was calculated using three validated indices: Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG), Gunning Fog (GFI), and Flesch-Kincaid (FKI). The percentage of documents above target readability and average readability scores from each database were calculated. RESULTS: We randomly sampled 100 disease-matched PEMs from three databases (n = 300 PEMs). Depending on the readability index used, 30-100% of PEMs were written above the 8(th) grade level. The average reading level for MedlinePlus, EBSCO, and Micromedex PEMs was 10.2 (1.9), 9.7 (1.3), and 8.6 (0.9), respectively (p ≤ 0.000) as estimated by the GFI. Estimates of readability using SMOG and FKI were similar. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of PEMS available through the NLM and a popular EHR were written at reading levels considerably higher than that of the average US adult.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Many patient education materials (PEMs) available on the internet are written at high school or college reading levels, rendering them inaccessible to the average US resident, who reads at or below an 8(th) grade level. Currently, electronic health record (EHR) providers partner with companies that produce PEMs, allowing clinicians to access PEMs at the point of care. OBJECTIVE: To assess the readability of PEMs provided by a popular EHR vendor as well as the National Library of Medicine (NLM). DESIGN: We included PEMs from Micromedex, EBSCO, and MedlinePlus. Micromedex and EBSCO supply PEMs to Meditech, a popular EHR supplier in the US. MedlinePlus supplies the NLM. These PEM databases have high market penetration and accessibility. MEASUREMENTS: Grade reading level of the PEMs was calculated using three validated indices: Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG), Gunning Fog (GFI), and Flesch-Kincaid (FKI). The percentage of documents above target readability and average readability scores from each database were calculated. RESULTS: We randomly sampled 100 disease-matched PEMs from three databases (n = 300 PEMs). Depending on the readability index used, 30-100% of PEMs were written above the 8(th) grade level. The average reading level for MedlinePlus, EBSCO, and Micromedex PEMs was 10.2 (1.9), 9.7 (1.3), and 8.6 (0.9), respectively (p ≤ 0.000) as estimated by the GFI. Estimates of readability using SMOG and FKI were similar. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of PEMS available through the NLM and a popular EHR were written at reading levels considerably higher than that of the average US adult.
Authors: Andrea S Wallace; Hilary K Seligman; Terry C Davis; Dean Schillinger; Connie L Arnold; Betsy Bryant-Shilliday; Janet K Freburger; Darren A DeWalt Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2009-01-23
Authors: Kimberly Bloom-Feshbach; Dana Casey; Lucy Schulson; Peter Gliatto; Jonathan Giftos; Reena Karani Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2015-10-09 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Adam E M Eltorai; Syed S Naqvi; Soha Ghanian; Craig P Eberson; Arnold-Peter C Weiss; Christopher T Born; Alan H Daniels Journal: Clin Transl Sci Date: 2015-12-17 Impact factor: 4.689
Authors: Maria A Lopez-Olivo; Jude K A des Bordes; Maha N Syed; Ahmed Alemam; Abhinav Dodeja; Noha Abdel-Wahab; Maria E Suarez-Almazor Journal: Arch Osteoporos Date: 2021-02-10 Impact factor: 2.617