Literature DB >> 29291639

The Spanish Availability and Readability of Diabetes Apps.

Jorge A Rodriguez1, Karandeep Singh2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is growing evidence supporting the use of mobile health apps for the management of diabetes. Given the disproportionate impact of diabetes on Latinos, especially those with limited English proficiency (LEP) and low literacy, diabetes apps have the potential to address existing health disparities. Our study aimed to understand the current accessibility of diabetes apps for these populations.
METHODS: We searched the Android and iOS stores for the term "diabetes" to identify patient-facing diabetes apps. We reviewed the app store descriptions and user interfaces for Spanish availability. We assessed the readability of the descriptions in English and Spanish using the Lexile Analyzer and the Flesch-Kincaid Reading Grade Level.
RESULTS: Overall, in reviewing both app stores, 30% (28/92) of apps had descriptions available in Spanish, of which 41% (18/44) of Android apps were available in Spanish and 21% (10/48) iOS apps were available in Spanish. In addition, the readability of 94% (90/96) for the app store descriptions was above the recommended reading level for patient education material in English and Spanish. The overall kappa coefficient for app translation quality assessment was .72, reflecting moderate interrater agreement.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite the evidence supporting the use of diabetes apps, they do not cater to the language needs of LEP Latino patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  diabetes mellitus; digital divide; health disparities; health literacy; limited English proficiency; mobile health

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29291639      PMCID: PMC6154248          DOI: 10.1177/1932296817749610

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  16 in total

1.  Health information on the Internet: accessibility, quality, and readability in English and Spanish.

Authors:  G K Berland; M N Elliott; L S Morales; J I Algazy; R L Kravitz; M S Broder; D E Kanouse; J A Muñoz; J A Puyol; M Lara; K E Watkins; H Yang; E A McGlynn
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001 May 23-30       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Many Mobile Health Apps Target High-Need, High-Cost Populations, But Gaps Remain.

Authors:  Karandeep Singh; Kaitlin Drouin; Lisa P Newmark; JaeHo Lee; Arild Faxvaag; Ronen Rozenblum; Erika A Pabo; Adam Landman; Elissa Klinger; David W Bates
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  Effect of mobile phone intervention for diabetes on glycaemic control: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  X Liang; Q Wang; X Yang; J Cao; J Chen; X Mo; J Huang; L Wang; D Gu
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.359

4.  Association of health literacy with diabetes outcomes.

Authors:  Dean Schillinger; Kevin Grumbach; John Piette; Frances Wang; Dennis Osmond; Carolyn Daher; Jorge Palacios; Gabriela Diaz Sullivan; Andrew B Bindman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002 Jul 24-31       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 5.  Eliminating disparities among Latinos with type 2 diabetes: Effective eHealth strategies.

Authors:  Lenny López; Aswita Tan-McGrory; Gabrielle Horner; Joseph R Betancourt
Journal:  J Diabetes Complications       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 2.852

6.  Association of numeracy and diabetes control.

Authors:  Kerri Cavanaugh; Mary Margaret Huizinga; Kenneth A Wallston; Tebeb Gebretsadik; Ayumi Shintani; Dianne Davis; Rebecca Pratt Gregory; Lynn Fuchs; Robb Malone; Andrea Cherrington; Michael Pignone; Darren A DeWalt; Tom A Elasy; Russell L Rothman
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Language barriers, physician-patient language concordance, and glycemic control among insured Latinos with diabetes: the Diabetes Study of Northern California (DISTANCE).

Authors:  Alicia Fernandez; Dean Schillinger; E Margaret Warton; Nancy Adler; Howard H Moffet; Yael Schenker; M Victoria Salgado; Ameena Ahmed; Andrew J Karter
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Patient-Facing Mobile Apps to Treat High-Need, High-Cost Populations: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Karandeep Singh; Kaitlin Drouin; Lisa P Newmark; Malina Filkins; Elizabeth Silvers; Paul A Bain; Donna M Zulman; Jae-Ho Lee; Ronen Rozenblum; Erika Pabo; Adam Landman; Elissa V Klinger; David W Bates
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 4.773

9.  Assessing the Use of Mobile Health Technology by Patients: An Observational Study in Primary Care Clinics.

Authors:  Veronica Ramirez; Emily Johnson; Cesar Gonzalez; Vanessa Ramirez; Barbara Rubino; Gina Rossetti
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 4.773

Review 10.  Popular Glucose Tracking Apps and Use of mHealth by Latinos With Diabetes: Review.

Authors:  John Patrick Williams; Dirk Schroeder
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 4.773

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Has Technology Improved Diabetes Management in Relation to Age, Gender, and Ethnicity?

Authors:  Leslie Eiland; Thiyagarajan Thangavelu; Andjela Drincic
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 4.810

2.  Diabetes in the News: Readability Analysis of Malaysian Diabetes Corpus.

Authors:  Afendi Hamat; Azhar Jaludin; Tuti Ningseh Mohd-Dom; Haslina Rani; Nor Aini Jamil; Aznida Firzah Abdul Aziz
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  Mobile Health in Dialysis: The Best Engagement Medium Is the One that's with Patients.

Authors:  Karandeep Singh
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2020-12-22       Impact factor: 8.237

4.  What matters when exploring fidelity when using health IT to reduce disparities?

Authors:  Margaret A Handley; Jerad Landeros; Cindie Wu; Adriana Najmabadi; Daniela Vargas; Priyanka Athavale
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 2.796

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.