Literature DB >> 22528034

Fostering partnerships in survivorship care: report of the 2011 Canadian genitourinary cancers survivorship conference.

Jacqueline L Bender1, David Wiljer, Andrew Matthew, Christina M Canil, Laura Legere, Andrew Loblaw, Michael A S Jewett.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: New models of survivorship care are required to address the needs of genitourinary (GU) cancer survivors. Current approaches do not effectively engage cancer survivors or advocacy groups. A group of clinicians in collaboration with the Canadian Urologic Association held a forum for GU cancer survivors, advocacy groups, and health professionals to explore ways to collaboratively enhance survivorship care.
METHODS: Participants attended a 2-day conference that included presentations, breakout groups, and a postconference survey. Discussions by breakout groups were recorded and analyzed alongside open-ended survey responses for common themes. Basic statistics were calculated.
RESULTS: Conference participants (n = 42) included 18 cancer survivors/caregivers, 21 health professionals, and 3 researchers representing bladder, kidney, prostate, and testis cancer groups. Breakout group discussions and responses to the postconference survey (83.3 % response rate) showed strong support for greater collaboration among all parties. Strategies to facilitate collaboration reflected a need to: (1) raise awareness of the shared and unique needs of GU cancer survivors and the expertise of cancer advocacy groups, (2) facilitate communication and collaborative opportunities among clinicians/researchers and cancer survivors/advocacy groups, (3) facilitate collaborative programming and fund-raising among GU advocacy groups, and (4) synthesize and facilitate access to GU cancer survivorship resources and services.
CONCLUSIONS: There is strong support for formal collaboration to enhance survivorship care among a critical mass of GU cancer survivors, advocacy groups, clinicians, and researchers. Responsibility for collaboration lies with all stakeholder groups. Strategies to foster such partnerships should employ integrated knowledge translation approaches that actively engage all parties throughout the entire research to practice process. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Successful partnerships between cancer survivors, advocacy groups, clinicians, and researchers require familiarity with each other's expertise, along with sufficient resources and organizational structures. GU survivorship advocacy groups need to work more closely together to ensure a strong, unified voice when interacting with clinicians and researchers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22528034     DOI: 10.1007/s11764-012-0220-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Surviv        ISSN: 1932-2259            Impact factor:   4.442


  19 in total

Review 1.  Supportive care for cancer patients.

Authors:  M Fitch
Journal:  Hosp Q       Date:  2000

2.  Convergent evolution: the academic and policy roots of collaborative research.

Authors:  Jean-Louis Denis; Jonathan Lomas
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  2003-10

3.  Sharing and expanding academic and practitioner knowledge in health care.

Authors:  Jean Bartunek; Jordi Trullen; Eduard Bonet; Alfonso Sauquet
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  2003-10

Review 4.  Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in health research, services, education and policy: 1. Definitions, objectives, and evidence of effectiveness.

Authors:  Bernard C K Choi; Anita W P Pak
Journal:  Clin Invest Med       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 0.825

Review 5.  Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and transdisciplinarity in health research, services, education and policy: 2. Promotors, barriers, and strategies of enhancement.

Authors:  Bernard C K Choi; Anita W P Pak
Journal:  Clin Invest Med       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 0.825

6.  How to translate health research knowledge into effective healthcare action.

Authors:  Ian D Graham; Jacqueline Tetroe
Journal:  Healthc Q       Date:  2007

7.  Partnering with patients--a concept ready for action.

Authors:  Mary L Hook
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.187

8.  What happens when you involve patients as experts? a participatory action research project at a renal failure unit.

Authors:  Kerstin Blomqvist; Eva Theander; Inger Mowide; Veronica Larsson
Journal:  Nurs Inq       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.393

9.  The relationship between available support, unmet needs and caregiver burden in patients with advanced cancer and their carers.

Authors:  Louise Sharpe; Phyllis Butow; Claire Smith; David McConnell; Stephen Clarke
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 10.  Paternalism, participation and partnership - the evolution of patient centeredness in the consultation.

Authors:  Keith Taylor
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2008-10-18
View more
  2 in total

1.  Practice patterns and perceptions of survivorship care in Canadian genitourinary oncology: A multidisciplinary perspective.

Authors:  Ashraf Almatar; Suzanne Richter; Nafisha Lalani; Jackie L Bender; David Wiljer; Nour Alkazaz; Laura Legere; Manjula Maganti; Srikala S Sridhar; Pamela P Catton; Michael A S Jewett
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Effect of radical prostatectomy surgeon volume on complication rates from a large population-based cohort.

Authors:  Ashraf Almatar; Christopher J D Wallis; Sender Herschorn; Refik Saskin; Girish S Kulkarni; Ronald T Kodama; Robert K Nam
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.862

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.