Literature DB >> 18053389

Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and transdisciplinarity in health research, services, education and policy: 2. Promotors, barriers, and strategies of enhancement.

Bernard C K Choi1, Anita W P Pak.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/
PURPOSE: Multidisciplinary, interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary teams are increasingly encouraged in health research, services, education and policy. This paper is the second in a series. The first discussed the definitions, objectives, and evidence of effectiveness of multiple disciplinary teamwork. This paper continues to examine the promotors, barriers, and ways to enhance such teamwork.
METHODS: The paper is a literature review based on Google and MEDLINE (1982-2007) searches. "Multidisciplinarity", "interdisciplinarity", "transdisciplinarity" and "definition" were used as keywords to identify the pertinent literature.
RESULTS: The promotors of teamwork success include: good selection of team members, good team leaders, maturity and flexibility of team members, personal commitment, physical proximity of team members, the Internet and email as a supporting platform, incentives, institutional support and changes in the workplace, a common goal and shared vision, clarity and rotation of roles, communication, and constructive comments among team members. The barriers, in general, reflect the situation in which the promotors are lacking. They include: poor selection of the disciplines and team members, poor process of team functioning, lack of proper measures to evaluate success of interdisciplinary work, lack of guidelines for multiple authorship in research publications, language problems, insufficient time or funding for the project, institutional constraints, discipline conflicts, team conflicts, lack of communication between disciplines, and unequal power among disciplines.
CONCLUSION: Not every health project needs to involve multiple disciplines. Several questions can help in deciding whether a multiple disciplinary approach is required. If multiple disciplinarity is called for, eight strategies to enhance multiple disciplinary teamwork are proposed. They can be summarised in the acronym TEAMWORK - Team, Enthusiasm, Accessibility, Motivation, Workplace, Objectives, Role, Kinship.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18053389     DOI: 10.25011/cim.v30i6.2950

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Invest Med        ISSN: 0147-958X            Impact factor:   0.825


  33 in total

1.  Breaking Down the Siloes: Developing Effective Multidisciplinary HIV Research Teams.

Authors:  Manya Magnus; Amanda Castel
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2016-09

2.  Commentaries on "Informatics and medicine: from molecules to populations".

Authors:  R B Altman; R Balling; J F Brinkley; E Coiera; F Consorti; M A Dhansay; A Geissbuhler; W Hersh; S Y Kwankam; N M Lorenzi; F Martin-Sanchez; G I Mihalas; Y Shahar; K Takabayashi; G Wiederhold
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.176

3.  Perspectives of clinician and biomedical scientists on interdisciplinary health research.

Authors:  Suzanne Laberge; Mathieu Albert; Brian D Hodges
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2009-11-09       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Exploring urban health in Cape Town, South Africa: an interdisciplinary analysis of secondary data.

Authors:  Rebekka Mumm; Sonia Diaz-Monsalve; Eva Hänselmann; Johanna Freund; Michael Wirsching; Jan Gärtner; Richard Gminski; Katrin Vögtlin; Mirjam Körner; Lena Zirn; Ursula Wittwer-Backofen; Tolu Oni; Axel Kroeger
Journal:  Pathog Glob Health       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  A guide to publishing scientific research in the health sciences.

Authors:  P Huston; Bck Choi
Journal:  Can Commun Dis Rep       Date:  2017-09-07

Review 6.  Maximizing information from space data resources: a case for expanding integration across research disciplines.

Authors:  Nandu Goswami; Jerry J Batzel; Gilles Clément; T Peter Stein; Alan R Hargens; M Keith Sharp; Andrew P Blaber; Peter G Roma; Helmut G Hinghofer-Szalkay
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  Systems Engineering and Point of Care Testing: Report from the NIBIB POCT/Systems Engineering Workshop.

Authors:  James E Stahl; Heather McGowan; Ellen DiResta; Charlotte A Gaydos; Catherine Klapperich; John Parrish; Brenda Korte
Journal:  Point Care       Date:  2015-03

8.  Provider Perspectives on Advance Care Planning for Patients with Kidney Disease: Whose Job Is It Anyway?

Authors:  Ann M O'Hare; Jackie Szarka; Lynne V McFarland; Janelle S Taylor; Rebecca L Sudore; Ranak Trivedi; Lynn F Reinke; Elizabeth K Vig
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 8.237

9.  Open Dialogues in social networks: professional identity and transdisciplinary collaboration.

Authors:  Anne-Lise Holmesland; Jaakko Seikkula; Oystein Nilsen; Mark Hopfenbeck; Tom Erik Arnkil
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 5.120

Review 10.  Facilitating healthy coping in patients with diabetes: a systematic review.

Authors:  Carolyn T Thorpe; Lauren E Fahey; Heather Johnson; Maithili Deshpande; Joshua M Thorpe; Edwin B Fisher
Journal:  Diabetes Educ       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 2.140

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.