Literature DB >> 22527552

Failed labor induction in nulliparous women at term: the role of pelvic floor muscle strength.

Turhan Aran1, Mehmet A Osmanagaoglu, Cavit Kart, Suleyman Guven, Mustafa Sahin, Mesut A Unsal.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The prolongation, protraction or complete cessation of labor is called failed labor. It is one of the leading indications for cesarean delivery. The goal of this study was to measure pelvic floor muscle strength and investigate its effect on labor in nulliparous pregnant women.
METHODS: A total of 88 patients were included in the study. The study was conducted in nulliparous pregnant women with a low Bishop score (≤ 7). A low-dose intravenous oxytocin protocol was used for labor induction in all patients. Evaluation of pelvic floor muscle (PFM) strength was performed using a vaginal pressure measurement device just before labor induction. The duration of labor stages and the rate of failed labor were considered the main outcomes. The study group consisted of patients whose labor failed and who subsequently underwent cesarean delivery. The control group consisted of patients who delivered vaginally. The pelvic floor muscle strength and main outcome measures of the two groups were compared.
RESULTS: No differences were found in age, weight, height, body mass index (BMI), and neonatal birth weight between the study and control groups. The mean resting and maximum squeeze pressures in the study group were 29.6 ± 9.8 and 56.4 ± 12.1 cm H(2)O respectively, significantly higher than in the control group. The best predictor of failed labor was a maximum squeeze pressure value of 59 cm H(2)0 (51.6% sensitivity and 87.7% specificity).
CONCLUSIONS: Pelvic floor muscle strength appears to play a role in predicting failed labor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22527552     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-012-1754-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  32 in total

1.  Induction of labor in the nulliparous gravida with an unfavorable cervix.

Authors:  Brian M Mercer
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  A comparison of perineometer to brink score for assessment of pelvic floor muscle strength.

Authors:  Andrew F Hundley; Jennifer M Wu; Anthony G Visco
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Does antenatal pelvic floor muscle training affect the outcome of labour? A randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Wael Agur; Pippin Steggles; Malcolm Waterfield; Robert Freeman
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2007-05-26

4.  Prevention of postpartum stress incontinence in primigravidae with increased bladder neck mobility: a randomised controlled trial of antenatal pelvic floor exercises.

Authors:  E T C Reilly; R M Freeman; M R Waterfield; A E Waterfield; P Steggles; F Pedlar
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 6.531

5.  Trainability of the pelvic floor. A prospective study during pregnancy and after delivery.

Authors:  C A Nielsen; I Sigsgaard; M Olsen; M Tolstrup; B Danneskiold-Samsoee; J E Bock
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.636

6.  Pelvic floor damage and childbirth: a neurophysiological study.

Authors:  R E Allen; G L Hosker; A R Smith; D W Warrell
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1990-09

7.  Outcome after elective labor induction in nulliparous women: a matched cohort study.

Authors:  Hendrik Cammu; Guy Martens; Gunther Ruyssinck; Jean-Jacques Amy
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Does delayed child-bearing increase the risk of levator injury in labour?

Authors:  Hans P Dietz; Judy M Simpson
Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.100

Review 9.  Pelvic floor muscle training for prevention and treatment of urinary and faecal incontinence in antenatal and postnatal women.

Authors:  Jean Hay-Smith; Siv Mørkved; Kate A Fairbrother; G Peter Herbison
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-10-08

10.  Effect of antenatal pelvic floor muscle training on labor and birth.

Authors:  Kari Bø; Caroline Fleten; Wenche Nystad
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 7.661

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  The effect of antenatal pelvic floor muscle training on labor and delivery outcomes: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yihui Du; Li Xu; Lilu Ding; Yiping Wang; Zhiping Wang
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 2.  The effect of antenatal pelvic floor muscle exercises on labour and birth outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sahar Sadat Sobhgol; Caroline A Smith; Hannah Grace Dahlen
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-06-06       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Too tight to give birth? Assessment of pelvic floor muscle function in 277 nulliparous pregnant women.

Authors:  Kari Bø; Gunvor Hilde; Jette Stær Jensen; Franziska Siafarikas; Marie Ellstrøm Engh
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-06-08       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Surface electromyography of the pelvic floor at 6-8 weeks following delivery: a comparison of different modes of delivery.

Authors:  Kai-Min Guo; Lang-Chi He; Yan Feng; Liu Huang; Abraham Nick Morse; Hui-Shu Liu
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 1.932

5.  Failed induction of labor and associated factors among women undergoing induction at University of Gondar Specialized Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia.

Authors:  Tsion Tadesse; Nega Assefa; Hirbo Shore Roba; Yohannes Baye
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 3.007

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.