Literature DB >> 22527371

Triple-negative invasive breast cancer on dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR imaging: comparison with other breast cancer subtypes.

Ji Hyun Youk1, Eun Ju Son, Jin Chung, Jeong-Ah Kim, Eun-Kyung Kim.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the MRI features of triple-negative invasive breast cancer (TNBC) on dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging (DCE-MRI) and diffusion-weighted MR imaging (DWI) in comparison with ER-positive/HER2-negative (ER+) and HER2-positive cancer (HER2+).
METHODS: A total of 271 invasive cancers in 269 patients undergoing preoperative MRI and surgery were included. Two radiologists retrospectively assessed morphological and kinetic characteristics on DCE-MRI and tumour detectability on DWI. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of lesions were measured. Clinical and MRI features of the three subtypes were compared.
RESULTS: Compared with ER+ (n = 119) and HER2+ (n = 94), larger size, round/oval mass shape, smooth mass margin, and rim enhancement on DCE-MRI were significantly associated with TNBC (n = 58; P < 0.0001). On DWI, mean ADC value (× 10(-3) mm(2)/s) of TNBC (1.03) was higher than the mean ADC values for ER+ and HER2+ (0.89 and 0.84; P < 0.0001). There was no difference in tumour detectability (P = 0.099). Tumour size (P = 0.009), mass margin (smooth, P < 0.0001; irregular, P = 0.020), and ADC values (P = 0.002) on DCE-MRI and DWI were independent features of TNBC.
CONCLUSIONS: In addition to the morphological features, higher ADC values on DWI were independently associated with TNBC and could be useful in differentiating TNBC from ER+ and HER2+. KEY POINTS: • Triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC) lack oestrogen/progesterone receptors and HER2 expression/amplification. • TNBCs are larger, better defined and more necrotic than conventional cancers. • On MRI, necrosis yields high T2-weighted signal intensity and ADCs. • High ADC values can be useful in diagnosing TNBC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22527371     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-012-2425-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  41 in total

1.  Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions?

Authors:  C K Kuhl; P Mielcareck; S Klaschik; C Leutner; E Wardelmann; J Gieseke; H H Schild
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 2.  Triple negative breast cancer: unmet medical needs.

Authors:  Sumanta Kumar Pal; Barrett H Childs; Mark Pegram
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Molecular portraits of human breast tumours.

Authors:  C M Perou; T Sørlie; M B Eisen; M van de Rijn; S S Jeffrey; C A Rees; J R Pollack; D T Ross; H Johnsen; L A Akslen; O Fluge; A Pergamenschikov; C Williams; S X Zhu; P E Lønning; A L Børresen-Dale; P O Brown; D Botstein
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-08-17       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Clinicopathological features and treatment strategy for triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Yutaka Yamamoto; Hirotaka Iwase
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 5.  Understanding and treating triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Carey Anders; Lisa A Carey
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.990

6.  Diffusion-weighted imaging of breast cancer: correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficient value with prognostic factors.

Authors:  Sung Hun Kim; Eun Suk Cha; Hyeon Sook Kim; Bong Joo Kang; Jae Jeong Choi; Ji Han Jung; Yong Gyu Park; Young Jin Suh
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Mammographic features of triple receptor-negative primary breast cancers in young premenopausal women.

Authors:  Wei-Tse Yang; Mark Dryden; Kristine Broglio; Michael Gilcrease; Shaheenah Dawood; Peter J Dempsey; Vicente Valero; Gabriel Hortobagyi; Deann Atchley; Banu Arun
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2007-11-17       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  Triple-negative breast cancer: correlation between imaging and pathological findings.

Authors:  Eun Sook Ko; Byung Hee Lee; Hyun-A Kim; Woo-Chul Noh; Min Suk Kim; Sang-Ah Lee
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-11-07       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Triple-negative breast cancer: correlation between MR imaging and pathologic findings.

Authors:  Takayoshi Uematsu; Masako Kasami; Sachiko Yuen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Discordance between core needle biopsy (CNB) and excisional biopsy (EB) for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR) and HER2 status in early breast cancer (EBC).

Authors:  M Arnedos; A Nerurkar; P Osin; R A'Hern; I E Smith; M Dowsett
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 32.976

View more
  73 in total

1.  Differentiation of triple-negative breast cancer from other subtypes through whole-tumor histogram analysis on multiparametric MR imaging.

Authors:  Tianwen Xie; Qiufeng Zhao; Caixia Fu; Qianming Bai; Xiaoyan Zhou; Lihua Li; Robert Grimm; Li Liu; Yajia Gu; Weijun Peng
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Added value of mean and entropy of apparent diffusion coefficient values for evaluating histologic phenotypes of invasive ductal breast cancer with MR imaging.

Authors:  Shiteng Suo; Dandan Zhang; Fang Cheng; Mengqiu Cao; Jia Hua; Jinsong Lu; Jianrong Xu
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Breast cancer molecular subtype classifier that incorporates MRI features.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Sutton; Brittany Z Dashevsky; Jung Hun Oh; Harini Veeraraghavan; Aditya P Apte; Sunitha B Thakur; Elizabeth A Morris; Joseph O Deasy
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 4.  Imaging Surveillance After Primary Breast Cancer Treatment.

Authors:  Diana L Lam; Nehmat Houssami; Janie M Lee
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Correlation between electrical conductivity and apparent diffusion coefficient in breast cancer: effect of necrosis on magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Soo-Yeon Kim; Jaewook Shin; Dong-Hyun Kim; Eun-Kyung Kim; Hee Jung Moon; Jung Hyun Yoon; Jai Kyung You; Min Jung Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Quantitative parameters of MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT in the prediction of breast cancer prognosis and molecular type: an original study.

Authors:  Pavel Borisovich Gelezhe; Ivan Andreevich Blokhin; Damir Ildarovich Marapov; Sergey Pavlovich Morozov
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-12-15

7.  Using computer-extracted image phenotypes from tumors on breast magnetic resonance imaging to predict breast cancer pathologic stage.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Burnside; Karen Drukker; Hui Li; Ermelinda Bonaccio; Margarita Zuley; Marie Ganott; Jose M Net; Elizabeth J Sutton; Kathleen R Brandt; Gary J Whitman; Suzanne D Conzen; Li Lan; Yuan Ji; Yitan Zhu; Carl C Jaffe; Erich P Huang; John B Freymann; Justin S Kirby; Elizabeth A Morris; Maryellen L Giger
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast in a 14-year-old girl.

Authors:  Joo Yeon Kim; Yun Ju Kim; Sung Hun Kim; Bong Joo Kang; Byung Joo Song
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2014-07-06

9.  Multiparametric evaluation of preoperative MRI in early stage breast cancer: prognostic impact of peri-tumoral fat.

Authors:  J-P Obeid; R Stoyanova; D Kwon; M Patel; K Padgett; J Slingerland; C Takita; N Alperin; M Yepes; Y H Zeidan
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 3.405

10.  Quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient measurement obtained by 3.0Tesla MRI as a potential noninvasive marker of tumor aggressiveness in breast cancer.

Authors:  Manuela Durando; Lucas Gennaro; Gene Y Cho; Dilip D Giri; Merlin M Gnanasigamani; Sujata Patil; Elizabeth J Sutton; Joseph O Deasy; Elizabeth A Morris; Sunitha B Thakur
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 3.528

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.