Literature DB >> 21236593

Rectal cancer: mucinous carcinoma on magnetic resonance imaging indicates poor response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation.

Katja Oberholzer1, Matthias Menig, Andreas Kreft, Astrid Schneider, Theodor Junginger, Achim Heintz, Karl-Friedrich Kreitner, Andreas M Hötker, Torsten Hansen, Christoph Düber, Heinz Schmidberger.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess response of locally advanced rectal carcinoma to chemoradiation with regard to mucinous status and local tumor invasion found at pretherapeutic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 88 patients were included in this prospective study of patients with advanced mrT3 and mrT4 carcinomas. Carcinomas were categorized by MRI as mucinous (mucin proportion >50% within the tumor volume), and as nonmucinous. Patients received neoadjuvant chemoradiation consisting of 50.4 Gy (1.8 Gy/fraction) and 5-fluorouracil on Days 1 to 5 and Days 29 to 33. Therapy response was assessed by comparing pretherapeutic MRI with histopathology of surgical specimens (minimum distance between outer tumor edge and circumferential resection margin = CRM, T, and N category).
RESULTS: A mucinous carcinoma was found in 21 of 88 patients. Pretherapeutic mrCRM was 0 mm (median) in the mucinous and nonmucinous group. Of the 88 patients, 83 underwent surgery with tumor resection. The ypCRM (mm) at histopathology was significantly lower in mucinous carcinomas than in nonmucinous carcinomas (p ≤ 0.001). Positive resection margins (ypCRM ≤ 1 mm) were found more frequently in mucinous carcinomas than in nonmucinous ones (p ≤ 0.001). Treatment had less effect on local tumor stage in mucinous carcinomas than in nonmucinous carcinomas (for T downsizing, p = 0.012; for N downstaging, p = 0.007). Disease progression was observed only in patients with mucinous carcinomas (n = 5).
CONCLUSION: Mucinous status at pretherapeutic MRI was associated with a noticeably worse response to chemoradiation and should be assessed by MRI in addition to local tumor staging to estimate response to treatment before it is initiated.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21236593     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.08.057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  25 in total

Review 1.  [The role of cross-sectional imaging in staging of rectal cancer].

Authors:  A O Schäfer; M Langer; T Baumann
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Clinical significance of magnetic resonance imaging findings in rectal cancer.

Authors:  Charles F Bellows; Bernard Jaffe; Lorenzo Bacigalupo; Salvatore Pucciarelli; Guiseppe Gagliardi
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2011-04-28

3.  Rectal cancer : when is the local recurrence risk low enough to refrain from the aim to prevent it?

Authors:  M L Sautter-Bihl; W Hohenberger; R Fietkau; C Rödel; H Schmidberger; R Sauer
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.621

4.  High Rate of Positive Circumferential Resection Margins Following Rectal Cancer Surgery: A Call to Action.

Authors:  Aaron S Rickles; David W Dietz; George J Chang; Steven D Wexner; Mariana E Berho; Feza H Remzi; Frederick L Greene; James W Fleshman; Maher A Abbas; Walter Peters; Katia Noyes; John R T Monson; Fergal J Fleming
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 5.  Comparison of percentage changes in quantitative diffusion parameters for assessing pathological complete response to neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kai Chen; Hua-Long She; Tao Wu; Fang Hu; Tao Li; Liang-Ping Luo
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-09-25

6.  Mucinous adenocarcinoma arising from chronic perianal fistula-a multidisciplinary approach.

Authors:  Tamara Díaz-Vico; Daniel Fernández-Martínez; Carmen García-Gutiérrez; Aida Suárez-Sánchez; Isabel Cifrián-Canales; Guillermo Eduardo Mendoza-Pacas; Herminio Sánchez-Farpón; Nuria Truán-Alonso
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2019-06

7.  The potential predictive value of MRI and PET-CT in mucinous and nonmucinous rectal cancer to identify patients at high risk of metastatic disease.

Authors:  Brunella Barbaro; Lucia Leccisotti; Fabio M Vecchio; Marialuisa Di Matteo; Teresa Serra; Marco Salsano; Andrea Poscia; Claudio Coco; Roberto Persiani; Sergio Alfieri; Maria Antonietta Gambacorta; Vincenzo Valentini; Alessandro Giordano; Lorenzo Bonomo
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 8.  Mucinous carcinoma of the rectum: a distinct clinicopathological entity.

Authors:  M Chand; S Yu; R I Swift; G Brown
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 9.  Advances in the care of patients with mucinous colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Niek Hugen; Gina Brown; Robert Glynne-Jones; Johannes H W de Wilt; Iris D Nagtegaal
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 66.675

10.  Circumferential resection margins of rectal tumours post-radiotherapy: how can MRI aid surgical planning?

Authors:  E R McGlone; V Shah; C Lowdell; D Blunt; P Cohen; P M Dawson
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2014-07-19       Impact factor: 3.781

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.