Literature DB >> 22526889

In vitro evaluation of surface roughness, adhesion of periodontal ligament fibroblasts, and Streptococcus gordonii following root instrumentation with Gracey curettes and subsequent polishing with diamond-coated curettes.

Sigrun Eick1, Philip Bender, Simon Flury, Adrian Lussi, Anton Sculean.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of an additional usage of a diamond-coated curette on surface roughness, adhesion of periodontal ligament (PDL) fibroblasts, and of Streptococcus gordonii in vitro.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Test specimens were prepared from extracted teeth and exposed to instrumentation with conventional Gracey curettes with or without additional use of diamond-coated curettes. Surface roughness (Ra and Rz) was measured before and following treatment. In addition, the adhesion of PDL fibroblasts for 72 h and adhesion of S. gordonii ATCC 10558 for 2 h have been determined.
RESULTS: Instrumentation with conventional Gracey curettes reduced surface roughness (median Ra before: 0.36 μm/after: 0.25 μm; p < 0.001; median Rz before: 2.34 μm/after: 1.61 μm; p < 0.001). The subsequent instrumentation with the diamond-coated curettes resulted in a median Ra of 0.31 μm/Rz of 2.06 μm (no significance in comparison to controls). The number of attached PDL fibroblasts did not change following scaling with Gracey curettes. The additional instrumentation with the diamond-coated curettes resulted in a two-fold increase in the number of attached PDL fibroblasts but not in the numbers of adhered bacteria.
CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of root surfaces with conventional Gracey curettes followed by subsequent polishing with diamond-coated curettes may result in a root surface which provides favorable conditions for the attachment of PDL fibroblasts without enhancing microbial adhesion. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The improved attachment of PDL fibroblasts and the limited microbial adhesion on root surfaces treated with scaling with conventional Gracey curettes followed by subsequent polishing with diamond-coated curettes may favor periodontal wound healing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22526889     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-012-0719-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  32 in total

1.  Subgingival polishing with a teflon-coated sonic scaler insert in comparison to conventional instruments as assessed on extracted teeth (II). Subgingival roughness.

Authors:  T Kocher; M Rosin; N Langenbeck; O Bernhardt
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 8.728

2.  Apatite microtopographies instruct signaling tapestries for progenitor-driven new attachment of teeth.

Authors:  Smit J Dangaria; Yoshihiro Ito; LeiLei Yin; Giovanni Valdré; Xianghong Luan; Thomas G H Diekwisch
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 3.845

3.  Clinical attachment loss produced by curettes and ultrasonic scalers.

Authors:  Renato Vasconcelos Alves; Luciana Machion; Màrcio Zaffalon Casati; Francisco Humberto Nociti; Enilson Antonio Sallum; Antonio Wilson Sallum
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 8.728

Review 4.  Nonsurgical mechanical treatment strategies for periodontal disease.

Authors:  Danae A Apatzidou; Denis F Kinane
Journal:  Dent Clin North Am       Date:  2010-01

5.  Root surface roughness in response to periodontal instrumentation studied by combined use of microroughness measurements and scanning electron microscopy.

Authors:  K Meyer; T Lie
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 8.728

Review 6.  The influence of surface roughness and surface-free energy on supra- and subgingival plaque formation in man. A review of the literature.

Authors:  M Quirynen; C M Bollen
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 8.728

7.  Attachment of human gingival fibroblasts to periodontally involved root surface following scaling and/or etching procedures: a scanning electron microscopy study.

Authors:  N Babay
Journal:  Braz Dent J       Date:  2001

8.  Bacterial adhesion on smooth and rough titanium surfaces after treatment with different instruments.

Authors:  Poliana Mendes Duarte; André Figueiredo Reis; Patrícia Moreira de Freitas; Claudia Ota-Tsuzuki
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 6.993

9.  Bacterial plaque retention on oral hard materials: effect of surface roughness, surface composition, and physisorbed polycarboxylate.

Authors:  Marla D McConnell; Yu Liu; Andrew P Nowak; Shira Pilch; James G Masters; Russell J Composto
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 4.396

10.  Ultramorphology of the root surface subsequent to hand-ultrasonic simultaneous instrumentation during non-surgical periodontal treatments: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Simone D Aspriello; Matteo Piemontese; Luca Levrini; Salvatore Sauro
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.698

View more
  5 in total

1.  Removal of simulated biofilm: an evaluation of the effect on root surfaces roughness after scaling.

Authors:  Christian Graetz; Anna Plaumann; Robert Wittich; Claudia Springer; Maren Kahl; Christof E Dörfer; Karim Fawzy El-Sayed
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Clinical and laboratory evaluation of the effects of different treatment modalities on titanium healing caps: a randomized, controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Kristina Emily Schmidt; Thorsten Mathias Auschill; Christian Heumann; Roland Frankenberger; Sigrun Eick; Anton Sculean; Nicole Birgit Arweiler
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Surface roughness of enamel and root surface after scaling, root planning and polishing procedures: An in-vitro study.

Authors:  Tuba Talo Yildirim; Faruk Oztekin; Esra Keklik; Melek Didem Tozum
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2021-02-27

4.  Characteristics of the molar surface after removal of cervical enamel projections: comparison of three different rotating instruments.

Authors:  Min-Jeong Ko; Chan-Myung Cho; Seong-Nyum Jeong
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 2.614

5.  Comparative evaluation of manual scaling and root planing with or without magnification loupes using scanning electron microscope: A pilot study.

Authors:  Ankita Dadwal; Rupinder Kaur; Vikas Jindal; Ashish Jain; Atin Mahajan; Amit Goel
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2018 Jul-Aug
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.