Literature DB >> 22526705

Comparison of the aorta impingement risks between thoracolumbar/lumbar curves with different convexities in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a computed tomography study.

Jun Qiao1, Feng Zhu, Leilei Xu, Zezhang Zhu, Bangping Qian, Zhen Liu, Yong Qiu.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the positions of the aorta relative to vertebral bodies and the potential risk of the aorta impingement for pedicle screw (PS) placement between right-sided and left-sided thoracolumbar/lumbar curves of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).
METHODS: Thirty-nine AIS patients with a main thoracolumbar or lumbar curve were recruited. The Lenke's classification was type 5C in all patients. According to the convexity of the thoracolumbar or lumbar curves, the patients were divided into either group R or Group L. The patients in Group R had a main right-sided thoracolumbar/lumbar curve, and the patients in Group L had a main left-sided thoracolumbar/lumbar curve. Axial CT images from T12 to L4 at the midvertebral body level were obtained to evaluate Aorta-vertebra angle (α), Vertebral rotation angle (β), Lefty safety distance (LSD), and Right safety distance (RSD). The risks of the aorta impingement from T12 to L4 were calculated and then compared between the two groups.
RESULTS: The α increased from T12 through L4 in Group R, increased from T12 through L1, and then decreased from L1 through L4 in Group L. The β decreased from T12 through L4 in both groups. The LSD constantly increased from T12 through L4 in Group R, increased from T12 through L3, and then decreased from L3 through L4 in Group L. The RSD increased from T12 through L3 and then decreased from L3 through L4 in both groups. With the increment of the lengths of the simulated screws, the aorta impingement risks were constantly elevated at all levels in both groups. The aorta was at a high risk of impingement from left PS regardless of the diameters of the simulated screws in Group R (80-100 % at T12 and 53.3-100 % at L1). In Group L, the aorta was completely safe when using 35 mm (0 at all levels) PS and at high risks of the aorta impingement on the right side from 45 mm PSs (31.8-72.7 %). In all, the risks of the aorta impingement were mainly from left PS in Group R and from right PS in Group L, and the risk of the aorta impingement from PS placement was generally higher in right thoracolumbar or lumbar curves when compared with that of the left.
CONCLUSIONS: The present study illustrated different changed positions of the aorta relative to vertebrae between thoracolumbar/lumbar curves with different convexities. In right-sided curve, the risks of the aorta impingement were mainly from left PS while in left-sided curves, from right PS. The aorta was more proximal to entry points in right-sided lumbar curve when compared with left-sided curve; thus placing PS carries more risks in right-sided thoracolumbar/lumbar curve. Surgeons should be more cautious when placing PSs on the concave sides of T12 and L1 vertebrae of right-sided thoracolumbar/lumbar curves.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22526705      PMCID: PMC3463682          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-012-2315-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  13 in total

1.  Scoliosis correction by Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation. The effect of derotation and three dimensional correction.

Authors:  M Krismer; R Bauer; W Sterzinger
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  New parameters to represent the position of the aorta relative to the spine for pedicle screw placement.

Authors:  Katsushi Takeshita; Toru Maruyama; Takashi Ono; Satoshi Ogihara; Hirotaka Chikuda; Naoki Shoda; Yusuke Nakao; Ko Matsudaira; Atsushi Seichi; Kozo Nakamura
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Correction of body height in predicting spirometric values in scoliotic patients.

Authors:  J Bjure; G Grimby; A Nachemson
Journal:  Scand J Clin Lab Invest       Date:  1968       Impact factor: 1.713

4.  Segmental pedicle screw instrumentation in idiopathic thoracolumbar and lumbar scoliosis.

Authors:  H Halm; T Niemeyer; T Link; U Liljenqvist
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Is a right pedicle screw always away from the aorta in scoliosis?

Authors:  Katsushi Takeshita; Toru Maruyama; Shurei Sugita; Yasushi Oshima; Jiro Morii; Hirotaka Chikuda; Takashi Ono; Kozo Nakamura
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Thoracic pedicle screw fixation in spinal deformities: are they really safe?

Authors:  S I Suk; W J Kim; S M Lee; J H Kim; E R Chung
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  The changes of relative position of the thoracic aorta after anterior or posterior instrumentation of type I Lenke curve in adolescent idiopathic thoracic scoliosis.

Authors:  Weijun Wang; Zezhang Zhu; Feng Zhu; Bin Wang; Winnie C W Chu; Jack C Y Cheng; Yong Qiu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-05-31       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  The position of the aorta relative to the spine: a comparison of patients with and without idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Daniel J Sucato; Clark Duchene
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  The position of the aorta relative to the spine in patients with left thoracic scoliosis: a comparison with normal patients.

Authors:  Todd A Milbrandt; Daniel J Sucato
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-05-20       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Incidence and risk factors of neurological deficits of surgical correction for scoliosis: analysis of 1373 cases at one Chinese institution.

Authors:  Yong Qiu; Shoufeng Wang; Bin Wang; Yang Yu; Feng Zhu; Zezhang Zhu
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Aortic injury in spine surgery……What a spine surgeon needs to know.

Authors:  Safwan Alomari; Ryan Planchard; Sheng-Fu Larry Lo; Timothy Witham; Ali Bydon
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  The risks of aorta impingement from pedicle screw may increase due to aorta movement during posterior instrumentation in Lenke 5C curve: a computed tomography study.

Authors:  Ling Chen; Leilei Xu; Yong Qiu; Jun Qiao; Fei Wang; Zhen Liu; Benglong Shi; Bang-ping Qian; Zezhang Zhu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Delayed presentation of infected common iliac artery pseudoaneurysm caused by malpositioned pedicle screw after minimally invasive scoliosis surgery.

Authors:  Seung-Woo Suh; Gang-Un Kim; Hoon-Nyun Lee; Jae Hyuk Yang; Dong-Gune Chang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Validity and reliability of a computer-assisted system method to measure axial vertebral rotation.

Authors:  José Hurtado-Avilés; Vicente J León-Muñoz; Jose Manuel Sanz-Mengibar; Fernando Santonja-Renedo; Pilar Andújar-Ortuño; Mónica Collazo-Diéguez; Vicente Ferrer-López; Joaquín Roca-González; Konstantsin Sergeevich Kurochka; Mercedes Cabañero-Castillo; Joaquín Alcaraz-Belzunces; Nieves Aidé Ruiz-Cambra; Victoria Eugenia Fuentes-Santos; Ana Belén Ponce-Garrido; Miriam González-Ballester; Francisco Javier Sánchez-Martínez; Andrés Campuzano-Melgarejo; Pietro Gino Fiorita; Fernando Santonja-Medina
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-03

5.  Vertebral rotation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis calculated by radiograph and back surface analysis-based methods: correlation between the Raimondi method and rasterstereography.

Authors:  Massimiliano Mangone; Paolo Raimondi; Marco Paoloni; Sabina Pellanera; Alessandra Di Michele; Sara Di Renzo; Mariangela Vanadia; Mauro Dimaggio; Massimiliano Murgia; Valter Santilli
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Great Vessel Excursion: Prone Versus Supine Position.

Authors:  Alexander R Riccio; Andrew Bishop; Allen L Carl
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-04-30

7.  Validity and Absolute Reliability of the Cobb Angle in Idiopathic Scoliosis with TraumaMeter Software.

Authors:  José Hurtado-Avilés; Fernando Santonja-Medina; Vicente J León-Muñoz; Pilar Sainz de Baranda; Mónica Collazo-Diéguez; Mercedes Cabañero-Castillo; Ana B Ponce-Garrido; Victoria Eugenia Fuentes-Santos; Fernando Santonja-Renedo; Miriam González-Ballester; Francisco Javier Sánchez-Martínez; Pietro Gino Fiorita; Jose Manuel Sanz-Mengibar; Joaquín Alcaraz-Belzunces; Vicente Ferrer-López; Pilar Andújar-Ortuño
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 4.614

8.  A case report of congenital scoliosis associated with situs inversus totalis.

Authors:  Ce Zhu; Shishu Huang; Chunguang Zhou; Xi Yang; Lei Wang; Tingxian Ling; Limin Liu; Yueming Song
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.817

9.  Developing of a Mathematical Model to Perform Measurements of Axial Vertebral Rotation on Computer-Aided and Automated Diagnosis Systems, Using Raimondi's Method.

Authors:  José Hurtado-Aviles; Joaquín Roca-González; Konstantsin Sergeevich Kurochka; Jose Manuel Sanz-Mengibar; Fernando Santonja-Medina
Journal:  Radiol Res Pract       Date:  2021-02-05
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.