Literature DB >> 22526379

Comparison of inflammatory response after implantation of sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents in patients on hemodialysis.

Hideki Yano1, Shigeo Horinaka, Hiroshi Yagi, Toshihiko Ishimitsu.   

Abstract

Because systemic inflammation after coronary intervention places patients at increased risk of subsequent cardiac events, we aimed to compare clinical outcomes and chronic serum inflammation markers of paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) and sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) in hemodialysis patients. Paclitaxel-eluting stents and SES were implanted in 36 patients with 46 lesions, and 32 patients with 40 lesions, respectively. In addition to 1-year major adverse cardiac event (MACE) rates, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), neopterin, intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1) and vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM-1) were also compared before and 9 months after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The incidence of MACE was significantly lower in the PES group than in the SES group (11.1 vs. 25.0 %, respectively, P = 0.042), mainly due to the reduction of target lesion revascularization in the PES group (6.5 vs. 17.5 %, P = 0.003). The logarithm of hs-CRP as well as IL-6 decreased significantly 9 months post-PCI compared with pre-PCI in the PES group (hs-CRP: 3.65 ± 0.35 vs. 2.91 ± 0.48, P = 0.007; IL-6: 6.73 ± 3.66 vs. 2.61 ± 2.29, P = 0.017) but not in the SES group (hs-CRP: 3.33 ± 0.29 vs. 3.42 ± 0.27, P not significant; IL-6: 6.08 ± 4.97 vs. 5.66 ± 4.29, P not significant). However, neopterin, ICAM-1, and VCAM-1 remained unchanged both pre-PCI and 9 months post-PCI in both groups. Moreover, MACE were less frequent in patients with decreased hs-CRP levels 9 months post-PCI compared with patients without decreased hs-CRP levels (P = 0.002) in all patients. Paclitaxel-eluting stents appear to be more effective than SES in reducing MACE rates, especially target lesion revascularization, and may be able to stabilize local inflammatory changes of target lesions specifically in patients on hemodialysis. Thus PES, which inhibit in-stent restenosis and cardiac events in hemodialysis patients, may play an important role in suppression of chronic inflammatory response in target lesions as compared with SES. Chronic continuous inflammation plays an important role after implantation of both types of stent with regard to in-stent restenosis in patients on hemodialysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22526379     DOI: 10.1007/s00380-012-0250-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Vessels        ISSN: 0910-8327            Impact factor:   2.037


  36 in total

Review 1.  Coronary stenting and inflammation.

Authors:  Achille Gaspardone; Francesco Versaci
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2005-10-05       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  Clinical usefulness of drug-eluting stents in the treatment of dialysis patients with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Masaya Otsuka; Mamoru Toyofuku; Noriaki Watanabe; Chikaaki Motoda; Tomoharu Kawase; Ryo Takeda; Shinji Mito; Hiromichi Tamekiyo; Tomokazu Okimoto; Hidekazu Hirao; Yuji Muraoka; Hironori Ueda; Yoshiko Masaoka; Yasuhiko Hayashi
Journal:  EuroIntervention       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 6.534

3.  Clinical outcome following percutaneous coronary interventions in patients with chronic renal failure.

Authors:  Luis Gruberg; George Dangas; Roxana Mehran; Gary S Mintz; Kenneth M Kent; Augusto D Pichard; Lowell F Satler; Alexandra J Lansky; Gregg W Stone; Martin B Leon
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Inflammatory profile in unstable angina versus stable angina in patients undergoing percutaneous interventions.

Authors:  S Yazdani; A D Simon; R Vidhun; C Gulotta; A Schwartz; L E Rabbani
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.749

5.  Sirolimus-eluting stents vs bare metal stents for coronary intervention in Japanese patients with renal failure on hemodialysis.

Authors:  Toru Aoyama; Hideki Ishii; Takanobu Toriyama; Hiroshi Takahashi; Hirotake Kasuga; Ryuichiro Murakami; Tetsuya Amano; Tadayuki Uetani; Yoshinari Yasuda; Yukio Yuzawa; Shoichi Maruyama; Seiichi Matsuo; Tatsuaki Matsubara; Toyoaki Murohara
Journal:  Circ J       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.993

Review 6.  Percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with end-stage renal disease.

Authors:  Wolfgang Bocksch; Suzanne Fateh-Moghadam; Eda Mueller; Sonja Huehns; Juergen Waigand; Rainer Dietz
Journal:  Kidney Blood Press Res       Date:  2006-03-07       Impact factor: 2.687

7.  Coronary restenotic reduction of drug-eluting stenting may be due to its anti-inflammatory effects.

Authors:  Jian-Jun Li; Jie Li; Jin-Lo Nan; Zhen Li; Xin Zhen; Chao-Wei Mu; Jun Dai; Chao-Yang Zhang
Journal:  Med Hypotheses       Date:  2007-05-11       Impact factor: 1.538

Review 8.  Inflammation and restenosis after percutaneous coronary interventions.

Authors:  Konstantinos Toutouzas; Antonio Colombo; Christodoulos Stefanadis
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 29.983

9.  Clinical and angiographic outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention with sirolimus-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Sen Yachi; Kengo Tanabe; Shuzou Tanimoto; Jiro Aoki; Gaku Nakazawa; Hirosada Yamamoto; Shuji Otsuki; Atsuhiko Yagishita; Satoru Kishi; Masataka Nakano; Masahiro Taniwaki; Shunsuke Sasaki; Hiroyoshi Nakajima; Naofumi Mise; Tokuichiro Sugimoto; Kazuhiro Hara
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2009-04-25       Impact factor: 8.860

10.  Sirolimus- vs paclitaxel-eluting stents in de novo coronary artery lesions: the REALITY trial: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Marie-Claude Morice; Antonio Colombo; Bernhard Meier; Patrick Serruys; Corrado Tamburino; Giulio Guagliumi; Eduardo Sousa; Hans-Peter Stoll
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-02-22       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  5 in total

1.  Influence of hemodialysis duration on mid-term clinical outcomes in hemodialysis patients with coronary artery disease after drug-eluting stent implantation.

Authors:  Norihiro Kobayashi; Toshiya Muramatsu; Reiko Tsukahara; Yoshiaki Ito; Hiroshi Ishimori; Keisuke Hirano; Masatsugu Nakano; Masahiro Yamawaki; Motoharu Araki; Hideyuki Takimura; Yasunari Sakamoto
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  The late-phase inflammatory response after drug-eluting stent implantation.

Authors:  Isao Taguchi; Shuichi Yoneda; Shichiro Abe; Shigeru Toyoda; Takahisa Nasuno; Setsu Nishino; Michiya Kageyama; Michiaki Tokura; Mikie Ogawa; Koichi Node; Teruo Inoue
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Cell adhesion molecules and eNOS expression in aorta of normocholesterolemic mice with different predispositions to atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Jana Rathouska; Ivana Nemeckova; Lenka Zemankova; Zbynek Strasky; Katerina Jezkova; Michala Varejckova; Petr Nachtigal
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2014-03-15       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  Plasma urokinase antigen and C-reactive protein predict angina recurrence after coronary angioplasty.

Authors:  Yelena Parfyonova; Irina Alekseeva; Olga Plekhanova; Alexander Deev; Elena Titaeva; Anatoly Dobrovolsky; Zufar Gabbasov; Anatoly Lyakishev; Vsevolod Tkachuk
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2013-09-22       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  Nitinol stent implantation for femoropopliteal disease in patients on hemodialysis: results of the 3-year retrospective multicenter APOLLON study.

Authors:  Masahiko Fujihara; Akihiro Higashimori; Yoshihiro Kato; Hiromasa Taniguchi; Yusuke Iwasaki; Tomonori Amano; Akinori Sumiyoshi; Daisuke Nishiya; Yoshiaki Yokoi
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 2.037

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.