A Klingenstein1, A R Haug, C J Zech, U C Schaller. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, Ludwig-Maximilians University, Mathildenstraße 8, 80336, Munich, Germany. annemarie.klingenstein@med.uni-muenchen.de
Abstract
PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate the overall survival, safety, and efficacy of metastatic uveal melanoma patients after radioembolization as salvage therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirteen patients were treated with radioembolization of branches of the hepatic artery with resin-based yttrium-90 ((90)Y)-labelled microspheres. Twelve patients underwent a single application, and 1 patient underwent 4 interventions. Dosages from 644 to 2,450 MBq (mean activity 1,780) were applied. Treatment response was evaluated by way of liver magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography (CT) as well as whole-body fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET)/CT with evaluation of percentage changes in SUV(max) before and at 2-3 months after therapy. Kaplan-Meier analysis was calculated to determine overall survival. RESULTS: Partial remission (PR) was observed in 8 (62 %), stable disease (SD) in 2 (15 %), and progressive disease (PD) in 3 (23 %) patients under terms of standard criteria and PR in 3 (23 %), SD in 3 (23 %), and PD in 7 (54 %) patients according to PET criteria. Neither RECIST nor PET criteria showed a significant difference in predicting overall survival (P = 0.12 and 0.11, respectively). Median survival time after radioembolization was 7 months. No acute toxicity with in-hospital morbidity was observed. One patient developed hepatomegaly, and 1 patient developed gastric ulceration. Throughout follow-up, progression of extrahepatic metastases was observed. CONCLUSION: Radioembolization may be a promising therapy in uveal melanoma patients with predominant hepatic metastases. At first follow-up, we observed PR or SD in 77 % patients under terms of standard criteria with an acceptable toxicity profile.
PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate the overall survival, safety, and efficacy of metastatic uveal melanomapatients after radioembolization as salvage therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirteen patients were treated with radioembolization of branches of the hepatic artery with resin-based yttrium-90 ((90)Y)-labelled microspheres. Twelve patients underwent a single application, and 1 patient underwent 4 interventions. Dosages from 644 to 2,450 MBq (mean activity 1,780) were applied. Treatment response was evaluated by way of liver magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography (CT) as well as whole-body fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET)/CT with evaluation of percentage changes in SUV(max) before and at 2-3 months after therapy. Kaplan-Meier analysis was calculated to determine overall survival. RESULTS: Partial remission (PR) was observed in 8 (62 %), stable disease (SD) in 2 (15 %), and progressive disease (PD) in 3 (23 %) patients under terms of standard criteria and PR in 3 (23 %), SD in 3 (23 %), and PD in 7 (54 %) patients according to PET criteria. Neither RECIST nor PET criteria showed a significant difference in predicting overall survival (P = 0.12 and 0.11, respectively). Median survival time after radioembolization was 7 months. No acute toxicity with in-hospital morbidity was observed. One patient developed hepatomegaly, and 1 patient developed gastric ulceration. Throughout follow-up, progression of extrahepatic metastases was observed. CONCLUSION: Radioembolization may be a promising therapy in uveal melanomapatients with predominant hepatic metastases. At first follow-up, we observed PR or SD in 77 % patients under terms of standard criteria with an acceptable toxicity profile.
Authors: Nicholas Fidelman; Robert K Kerlan; Randall A Hawkins; Andrew G Taylor; Maureen P Kohi; K Pallav Kolli; Emily K Bergsland; R Kate Kelley; Andrew H Ko; W Michael Korn; Ryan M McWhirter; Jennifer Luan; Alan P Venook Journal: J Gastrointest Cancer Date: 2014-06
Authors: Harriet Eldredge-Hindy; Nitin Ohri; Pramila R Anne; David Eschelman; Carin Gonsalves; Charles Intenzo; Voichita Bar-Ad; Adam Dicker; Laura Doyle; Jun Li; Takami Sato Journal: Am J Clin Oncol Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 2.339
Authors: Marybeth S Hughes; Jonathan Zager; Mark Faries; H Richard Alexander; Richard E Royal; Bradford Wood; Junsung Choi; Kevin McCluskey; Eric Whitman; Sanjiv Agarwala; Gary Siskin; Charles Nutting; Mary Ann Toomey; Carole Webb; Tatiana Beresnev; James F Pingpank Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2015-11-23 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Chandrani Chattopadhyay; Dae Won Kim; Dan S Gombos; Junna Oba; Yong Qin; Michelle D Williams; Bita Esmaeli; Elizabeth A Grimm; Jennifer A Wargo; Scott E Woodman; Sapna P Patel Journal: Cancer Date: 2016-03-15 Impact factor: 6.860