UNLABELLED: Measurement of haemoglobin (Hb) adducts from acrylamide (AA) and its metabolite glycidamide (GA) is a possibility to improve the exposure assessment in epidemiological studies of AA intake from food. This study aims to clarify the reliability of Hb-adduct measurement from individual single samples for exposure assessment of dietary AA intake. The intra-individual variations of AA- and GA-adduct levels measured in blood samples collected over 20 months from 13 non-smokers were up to 2-fold and 4-fold, respectively. The corresponding interindividual variations observed between 68 non-smokers, with large differences in AA intake, were 6-fold and 8-fold, respectively. The intra-individual variation of the GA-to-AA-adduct level ratio was up to 3-fold, compared to 11-fold between individuals (n = 68). From AA-adduct levels the average AA daily intake (n = 68) was calculated and compared to that estimated from dietary history methodology: 0.52 and 0.67 μg/kg body weight and day, respectively. At an individual level the measures showed low association (Rs = 0.39). CONCLUSIONS: Dietary AA is the dominating source to measured AA-adduct levels and corresponding inter- and intra-individual variations in non-smokers. Measurements from single individual samples are useful for calculation of average AA intake and its variation in a cohort, and for identification of individuals only from extreme intake groups.
UNLABELLED: Measurement of haemoglobin (Hb) adducts from acrylamide (AA) and its metabolite glycidamide (GA) is a possibility to improve the exposure assessment in epidemiological studies of AA intake from food. This study aims to clarify the reliability of Hb-adduct measurement from individual single samples for exposure assessment of dietary AA intake. The intra-individual variations of AA- and GA-adduct levels measured in blood samples collected over 20 months from 13 non-smokers were up to 2-fold and 4-fold, respectively. The corresponding interindividual variations observed between 68 non-smokers, with large differences in AA intake, were 6-fold and 8-fold, respectively. The intra-individual variation of the GA-to-AA-adduct level ratio was up to 3-fold, compared to 11-fold between individuals (n = 68). From AA-adduct levels the average AA daily intake (n = 68) was calculated and compared to that estimated from dietary history methodology: 0.52 and 0.67 μg/kg body weight and day, respectively. At an individual level the measures showed low association (Rs = 0.39). CONCLUSIONS: Dietary AA is the dominating source to measured AA-adduct levels and corresponding inter- and intra-individual variations in non-smokers. Measurements from single individual samples are useful for calculation of average AA intake and its variation in a cohort, and for identification of individuals only from extreme intake groups.
Authors: Jing Xie; Kathryn L Terry; Elizabeth M Poole; Kathryn M Wilson; Bernard A Rosner; Walter C Willett; Hubert W Vesper; Shelley S Tworoger Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2013-02-15 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Pietro Ferrari; Heinz Freisling; Eric J Duell; Rudolf Kaaks; Leila Lujan-Barroso; Françoise Clavel-Chapelon; Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault; Laura Nailler; Silvia Polidoro; Amalia Mattiello; Domenico Palli; Rosario Tumino; Sara Grioni; Sven Knüppel; Anne Tjønneland; Anja Olsen; Kim Overvad; Philippos Orfanos; Michail Katsoulis; Antonia Trichopoulou; Jose Ramón Quirós; Eva Ardanaz; José María Huerta; Pilar Amiano Etxezarreta; María José Sánchez; Francesca Crowe; Kay-Tee Khaw; Nicholas J Wareham; Marga Ocke; Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita; Petra H M Peeters; Ulrika Ericson; Elisabet Wirfält; Göran Hallmans; Ingegerd Johansson; Dagrun Engeset; Geneviève Nicolas; Valentina Gallo; Teresa Norat; Elio Riboli; Nadia Slimani Journal: Eur J Nutr Date: 2012-11-01 Impact factor: 5.614
Authors: Janneke G F Hogervorst; Piet A van den Brandt; Roger W L Godschalk; Frederik-Jan van Schooten; Leo J Schouten Journal: Eur J Epidemiol Date: 2017-04-08 Impact factor: 8.082
Authors: Michael Poteser; Federica Laguzzi; Thomas Schettgen; Nina Vogel; Till Weber; Philipp Zimmermann; Domenica Hahn; Marike Kolossa-Gehring; Sónia Namorado; An Van Nieuwenhuyse; Brice Appenzeller; Thórhallur I Halldórsson; Ása Eiríksdóttir; Line Småstuen Haug; Cathrine Thomsen; Fabio Barbone; Valentina Rosolen; Loïc Rambaud; Margaux Riou; Thomas Göen; Stefanie Nübler; Moritz Schäfer; Karin Haji Abbas Zarrabi; Liese Gilles; Laura Rodriguez Martin; Greet Schoeters; Ovnair Sepai; Eva Govarts; Hanns Moshammer Journal: Toxics Date: 2022-08-17
Authors: Michael Poteser; Federica Laguzzi; Thomas Schettgen; Nina Vogel; Till Weber; Aline Murawski; Phillipp Schmidt; Maria Rüther; Marike Kolossa-Gehring; Sónia Namorado; An Van Nieuwenhuyse; Brice Appenzeller; Edda Dufthaksdóttir; Kristín Olafsdóttir; Line Småstuen Haug; Cathrine Thomsen; Fabio Barbone; Valentina Rosolen; Loïc Rambaud; Margaux Riou; Thomas Göen; Stefanie Nübler; Moritz Schäfer; Karin H A Zarrabi; Liese Gilles; Laura Rodriguez Martin; Greet Schoeters; Ovnair Sepai; Eva Govarts; Hanns Moshammer Journal: Toxics Date: 2022-08-02
Authors: Clara Amalie Gade Timmermann; Signe Sonne Mølck; Manik Kadawathagedara; Anne Ahrendt Bjerregaard; Margareta Törnqvist; Anne Lise Brantsæter; Marie Pedersen Journal: Toxics Date: 2021-06-30
Authors: Talita Duarte-Salles; Hans von Stedingk; Berit Granum; Kristine B Gützkow; Per Rydberg; Margareta Törnqvist; Michelle A Mendez; Gunnar Brunborg; Anne Lise Brantsæter; Helle Margrete Meltzer; Jan Alexander; Margaretha Haugen Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2012-11-29 Impact factor: 9.031