| Literature DB >> 22525437 |
Huaiwei Ding1, Zhe Chen, Cunlong Zhang, Tian Xin, Yini Wang, Hongrui Song, Yuyang Jiang, Yuzong Chen, Yongnan Xu, Chunyan Tan.
Abstract
A series of novel compounds bearing imidazo[2,1-b]thiazole scaffolds were designed and synthesized based on the optimization of the virtual screening hit compound N-(6-morpholinopyridin-3-yl)-2-(6-phenylimidazo[2,1-b]thiazol-3-yl)acetamide (5a), and tested for their cytotoxicity against human cancer cell lines, including HepG2 and MDA-MB-231. The results indicated that the compound 2-(6-(4-chlorophenyl)imidazo[2,1-b]thiazol-3-yl)-N-(6-(4-(4-methoxybenzyl)piperazin-1-yl)pyridin-3-yl)acetamide (5l), with slightly higher inhibition on VEGFR2 than 5a (5.72% and 3.76% inhibitory rate at 20 μM, respectively), was a potential inhibitor against MDA-MB-231 (IC(50) = 1.4 μM) compared with sorafenib (IC(50) = 5.2 μM), and showed more selectivity against MDA-MB-231 than HepG2 cell line (IC(50) = 22.6 μM).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22525437 PMCID: PMC6268833 DOI: 10.3390/molecules17044703
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Structures of hit compound 5a and modification position of target compounds.
Scheme 1The Synthesis Route of Compounds 5a–p.
The substituents and in vitro cytotoxicity of synthesized compounds against HepG2 and MDA-MB-231 cell lines.
| Compound | R1 | R2 | IC50* (µM) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HepG2 | MDA-MB-231 | |||
| H | 74.2 ± 2.5 | 27.1 ± 0.4 | ||
| H | OCH3 | >100 | >100 | |
| Cl | OCH3 | 63.7 ± 0.4 | 40.1 ± 1.3 | |
| H | Cl | 62.0 ± 3.7 | 22.8 ± 4.6 | |
| H | F | >100 | 79.0 ± 3.8 | |
| Cl | Cl | 50.0 ± 1.4 | 13.0 ± 0.2 | |
| Cl | F | 53.4 ± 0.5 | 22.3 ± 1.3 | |
| OCH3 | Cl | >100 | 51.8 ± 0.8 | |
| H | 71.5 ± 1.7 | >100 | ||
| Cl | 28.2 ± 0.6 | >100 | ||
| H | 39.4 ± 1.9 | 6.0 ± 0.7 | ||
| Cl | 22.6 ± 1.5 | 1.4 ± 0.1 | ||
| H | 55.2 ± 1.5 | 19.8 ± 2.2 | ||
| Cl | 34.7 ± 0.4 | 12.9 ± 0.2 | ||
| H | >100 | 62.6 ± 3.7 | ||
| Cl | 48.9 ± 1.4 | 35.1 ± 0.5 | ||
| 33.7 ± 1.3 | 5.2 ± 0.2 | |||
* The IC50 values were reported as the average of three independent determinations and expressed as the mean ± SD.