Literature DB >> 22525178

Testability of refraction, stereopsis, and other ocular measures in preschool children: the Sydney Paediatric Eye Disease Study.

Amy Shih-I Pai1, Kathryn A Rose, Chameen Samarawickrama, Reena Fotedar, George Burlutsky, Rohit Varma, Paul Mitchell.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the testability and lower age limits for applying common eye tests to preschool children.
METHODS: Investigators from the Sydney Paediatric Eye Disease Study examined 2,461 children aged 6 to 72 months between 2007 and 2009. Cycloplegic autorefraction was measured with Retinomax and Canon autorefractors. Ocular biometry was measured by the use of IOLMaster in children aged >30 months. The Randot Preschool Stereoacuity test, Lang-Stereotest II, and the Stereo Smile II test were administered to assess stereoacuity. Fundus photography was performed with the subjects' pupils dilated. Testability was defined as the ability to successfully complete tests in both eyes.
RESULTS: There were 2,189 children with complete data. Most were testable with the Retinomax (71.8%) and Canon (66.0%) autorefractors. Testability improved with age (P for trend <0.0001) for both, and Retinomax achieved >70% testability when a subject was 24 months of age, half the age limit (48 months) found for Canon. IOLMaster was mostly testable in children aged 48+ months. Lang-Stereotest II could be used in children aged 6 months and achieved the greatest testability (94.4%) of all stereotests. White children performed better than children of some other ethnicities on Randot (P = 0.007), with girls performing better than boys (P = 0.01). Bilateral photography was achieved in >70% of preschool children 48 months of age.
CONCLUSIONS: The testability of all measures was strongly age related, with mostly no sex or ethnicity effects found. The handheld Retinomax could be tested in >70% of children aged 24 months, younger than that found for the stationary Canon autorefractor (48 months). Testability measures for most eye tests in this preschool sample are comparable to other preschool studies.
Copyright © 2012 American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22525178     DOI: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2011.09.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J AAPOS        ISSN: 1091-8531            Impact factor:   1.220


  13 in total

1.  Characterizing the Randot Preschool stereotest: Testability, norms, reliability, specificity and sensitivity in children aged 2-11 years.

Authors:  Jenny C A Read; Sheima Rafiq; Jess Hugill; Therese Casanova; Carla Black; Adam O'Neill; Vicente Puyat; Helen Haggerty; Kathryn Smart; Christine Powell; Kate Taylor; Michael P Clarke; Kathleen Vancleef
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  The usefulness of the Retinomax autorefractor for childhood screening validated against a Danish preterm cohort examined at the age of 4 years.

Authors:  H C Fledelius; R Bangsgaard; C Slidsborg; M laCour
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Stereoacuity of preschool children with and without vision disorders.

Authors:  Elise B Ciner; Gui-Shuang Ying; Marjean Taylor Kulp; Maureen G Maguire; Graham E Quinn; Deborah Orel-Bixler; Lynn A Cyert; Bruce Moore; Jiayan Huang
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.973

4.  Comparison of the Retinomax hand-held autorefractor versus table-top autorefractor and retinoscopy.

Authors:  Ibrahim Tuncer; Mehmet Ozgur Zengin; Eyyup Karahan
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 1.779

5.  Utility of an open field Shack-Hartmann aberrometer for measurement of refractive error in infants and young children.

Authors:  Erin M Harvey; Joseph M Miller; Jim Schwiegerling
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.220

Review 6.  Tests for detecting strabismus in children aged 1 to 6 years in the community.

Authors:  Sarah Hull; Vijay Tailor; Sara Balduzzi; Jugnoo Rahi; Christine Schmucker; Gianni Virgili; Annegret Dahlmann-Noor
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-11-06

7.  The difference in stereoacuity testing: contour-based and random dot-based graphs at far and near distances.

Authors:  Lingzhi Zhao; Huang Wu
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-05

8.  Vision screening for children 36 to <72 months: recommended practices.

Authors:  Susan A Cotter; Lynn A Cyert; Joseph M Miller; Graham E Quinn
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.973

9.  Eye examination testability in children with autism and in typical peers.

Authors:  Rachel Anastasia Coulter; Annette Bade; Yin Tea; Gregory Fecho; Deborah Amster; Erin Jenewein; Jacqueline Rodena; Kara Kelley Lyons; G Lynn Mitchell; Nicole Quint; Sandra Dunbar; Michele Ricamato; Jennie Trocchio; Bonnie Kabat; Chantel Garcia; Irina Radik
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.973

10.  The screening of visual impairment among preschool children in an urban population in Malaysia; the Kuching pediatric eye study: a cross sectional study.

Authors:  Mallika Premsenthil; Rose Manju; Asokumaran Thanaraj; Syed Alwi Syed Abdul Rahman; Tan Aik Kah
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 2.209

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.