Literature DB >> 22523223

Screening for IgG antinuclear autoantibodies by HEp-2 indirect fluorescent antibody assays and the need for standardization.

Susan S Copple1, S Rashelle Giles, Troy D Jaskowski, Anna E Gardiner, Andrew M Wilson, Harry R Hill.   

Abstract

We evaluated 5 commercially available HEp-2 antinuclear antibody (ANA) indirect fluorescent antibody (IFA) assays using patient serum samples from 45 patients with rheumatoid arthritis, 50 with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), 35 with scleroderma, 20 with Sjögren syndrome, 10 with polymyositis, and 100 healthy control subjects. In addition, 12 defined serum samples from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and 100 patient serum samples sent to ARUP Laboratories (Salt Lake City, UT) for ANA IFA testing were also examined (n = 372). Standardization among the HEp-2 IFA assays occurred when they exhibited the same titer ± 1 doubling dilution. Agreement of the 5 assays was 78%. Within the specific groups of serum samples, agreement ranged from 44% in scleroderma serum samples to 93% in healthy control subjects, with 72% agreement in the SLE group. Variations in slide and substrate quality were also noted (ie, clarity, consistency of fluorescence, cell size, number and quality of mitotic cells). Along with subjectivity of interpretation, HEp-2 IFA assays are also vulnerable to standardization issues similar to other methods for ANA screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22523223     DOI: 10.1309/AJCPICNFG7UCES1S

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0002-9173            Impact factor:   2.493


  15 in total

1.  Clinical performance evaluation of a novel, automated chemiluminescent immunoassay, QUANTA Flash CTD Screen Plus.

Authors:  Chelsea Bentow; Gabriella Lakos; Rachel Rosenblum; Cassandra Bryant; Andrea Seaman; Michael Mahler
Journal:  Immunol Res       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.829

2.  New automated indirect immunofluorescent antinuclear antibody testing compares well with established manual immunofluorescent screening and titration for antinuclear antibody on HEp-2 cells.

Authors:  M Daves; J Blecken; T Matthias; A Frey; V Perkmann; A Dall Acqua; A Joos; S Platzgummer
Journal:  Immunol Res       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.829

3.  Antinuclear antibodies detection: A comparative study between automated recognition and conventional visual interpretation.

Authors:  ZhiYan Li; RuiLin Han; ZhenLin Yan; LiJuan Li; ZhenRu Feng
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 2.352

4.  Frequency and specificity of antibodies against nuclear and cytoplasmic antigens in healthy individuals by classic and new methods.

Authors:  E Giannouli; D Chatzidimitriou; S Gerou; E Gavriilaki; L Settas; E Diza
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2013-05-11       Impact factor: 2.980

5.  The burden of the variability introduced by the HEp-2 assay kit and the CAD system in ANA indirect immunofluorescence test.

Authors:  M Infantino; F Meacci; V Grossi; M Manfredi; M Benucci; M Merone; P Soda
Journal:  Immunol Res       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.829

Review 6.  Recent Approaches To Optimize Laboratory Assessment of Antinuclear Antibodies.

Authors:  Anne E Tebo
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2017-12-05

7.  A Multicenter Analysis of Subjectivity of Indirect Immunofluorescence Test in Antinuclear Antibody Screening.

Authors:  Vildan Turan Faraşat; Talat Ecemiş; Yavuz Doğan; Aslı Gamze Şener; Gülfem Terek Ece; Pınar Erbay Dündar; Tamer Şanlidağ
Journal:  Arch Rheumatol       Date:  2019-04-22       Impact factor: 1.472

Review 8.  Antinuclear antibody testing - misunderstood or misbegotten?

Authors:  David S Pisetsky
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 20.543

Review 9.  Standardization and Quality Assessment Under the Perspective of Automated Computer-Assisted HEp-2 Immunofluorescence Assay Systems.

Authors:  Luigi Cinquanta; Nicola Bizzaro; Giampaola Pesce
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 7.561

10.  Interpretation of ANA indirect immunofluorescence test outside the darkroom using NOVA view compared to manual microscopy.

Authors:  Susan S Copple; Troy D Jaskowski; Rashelle Giles; Harry R Hill
Journal:  J Immunol Res       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 4.818

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.