OBJECTIVES: The objective of this pilot study was to determine if frailty predicts surgical complications among elderly women undergoing gynecologic oncology procedures. METHODS: A cohort of gynecologic oncology patients age ≥ 65, undergoing surgery between March and December 2011 was identified. Frailty was evaluated using a validated assessment tool. The primary outcome measure was 30 day postoperative complication rate. RESULTS: Forty women were approached for study entry and 37 (92%) enrolled. The mean age was 73 years (range 65-95). The majority of women had a malignancy and underwent a major abdominal surgical procedure. Twenty-one women (57%) were not frail, 10 (27%) were intermediately frail and 6 (16%) were frail. There was no difference in age or prevalence of medical comorbidities between groups. Frail women had a significantly higher BMI compared to intermediately frail and not frail women, (36.0, 31.5 and 26.1 kg/m(2), p=0.02). The rate of 30-day surgical complications increased with frailty score and was 24%, versus 67% for women who were not frail as compared to the frail (p=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Pre-operative frailty assessment is well accepted by gynecologic oncology patients and feasible in a clinic setting. Frail women had a higher BMI, indicating that low body weight is not a marker for frailty, and had a significantly higher rate of 30-day postoperative complications in this pilot study. Initial findings support the concept of measuring frailty as a possible predictor for postoperative morbidity that will allow for improved patient counseling and decision making.
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this pilot study was to determine if frailty predicts surgical complications among elderly women undergoing gynecologic oncology procedures. METHODS: A cohort of gynecologic oncology patients age ≥ 65, undergoing surgery between March and December 2011 was identified. Frailty was evaluated using a validated assessment tool. The primary outcome measure was 30 day postoperative complication rate. RESULTS: Forty women were approached for study entry and 37 (92%) enrolled. The mean age was 73 years (range 65-95). The majority of women had a malignancy and underwent a major abdominal surgical procedure. Twenty-one women (57%) were not frail, 10 (27%) were intermediately frail and 6 (16%) were frail. There was no difference in age or prevalence of medical comorbidities between groups. Frail women had a significantly higher BMI compared to intermediately frail and not frail women, (36.0, 31.5 and 26.1 kg/m(2), p=0.02). The rate of 30-day surgical complications increased with frailty score and was 24%, versus 67% for women who were not frail as compared to the frail (p=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Pre-operative frailty assessment is well accepted by gynecologic oncology patients and feasible in a clinic setting. Frail women had a higher BMI, indicating that low body weight is not a marker for frailty, and had a significantly higher rate of 30-day postoperative complications in this pilot study. Initial findings support the concept of measuring frailty as a possible predictor for postoperative morbidity that will allow for improved patient counseling and decision making.
Authors: Casey M Hay; Heidi S Donovan; Grace B Campbell; Sarah E Taylor; Li Wang; Madeleine Courtney-Brooks Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2018-11-28 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Simon J G Richards; Frank A Frizelle; John A Geddes; Tim W Eglinton; Mark B Hampton Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2018-09-14 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: Olga T Filippova; Dennis S Chi; Kara Long Roche; Yukio Sonoda; Oliver Zivanovic; Ginger J Gardner; William P Tew; Roisin O'Cearbhaill; Saman Sarraf; Sung Wu Sun; Koshy Alexander; Beatriz Korc-Grodzicki; Armin Shahrokni Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2019-05-08 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Sudhir Isharwal; Jason M Johanning; Jennifer G Dwyer; Kendra K Schimid; Chad A LaGrange Journal: World J Urol Date: 2016-05-12 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: E M George; W M Burke; J Y Hou; A I Tergas; L Chen; A I Neugut; C V Ananth; D L Hershman; J D Wright Journal: BJOG Date: 2015-08-23 Impact factor: 6.531