BACKGROUND: Anticipatory care for older patients who are frail involves both case identification and proactive intervention to reduce hospitalisation. AIM: To identify a population who were at risk of admission to hospital and to provide an anticipatory care plan (ACP) for them and to ascertain whether using primary and secondary care data to identify this population and then applying an ACP can help to reduce hospital admission rates. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cohort study of a service intervention in a general practice and a primary care team in Scotland. METHOD: The ACP sets out patients' wishes in the event of a sudden deterioration in health. If admitted, a proactive approach was taken to transfer and discharge patients into the community. Cohorts were selected using the Nairn Case Finder, which matched patients in two practices for age, sex, multiple morbidity indexes, and secondary care outpatient and inpatient activity; 96 patients in each practice were studied for admission rate, occupied bed days and survival. RESULTS: Survivors from the ACP cohort (n = 80) had 510 fewer days in hospital than in the 12 months pre-intervention: a significant reduction of 52.0% (P = 0.020). There were 37 fewer admissions of the survivors from that cohort post-intervention than in the preceding 12 months, with a significant reduction of 42.5% (P = 0.002). Mortality rates in the two cohorts were similar, but the number of patients who died in hospital and the hospital bed days used in the last 3 months of life were significantly lower for the decedents with an ACP than for the controls who had died (P = 0.007 and P = 0.045 respectively). CONCLUSION: This approach produced statistically significant reductions in unplanned hospitalisation for a cohort of patients with multiple morbidities. It demonstrates the potential for providing better care for patients as well as better value for health and social care services. It is of particular benefit in managing end-of-life care.
BACKGROUND: Anticipatory care for older patients who are frail involves both case identification and proactive intervention to reduce hospitalisation. AIM: To identify a population who were at risk of admission to hospital and to provide an anticipatory care plan (ACP) for them and to ascertain whether using primary and secondary care data to identify this population and then applying an ACP can help to reduce hospital admission rates. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cohort study of a service intervention in a general practice and a primary care team in Scotland. METHOD: The ACP sets out patients' wishes in the event of a sudden deterioration in health. If admitted, a proactive approach was taken to transfer and discharge patients into the community. Cohorts were selected using the Nairn Case Finder, which matched patients in two practices for age, sex, multiple morbidity indexes, and secondary care outpatient and inpatient activity; 96 patients in each practice were studied for admission rate, occupied bed days and survival. RESULTS: Survivors from the ACP cohort (n = 80) had 510 fewer days in hospital than in the 12 months pre-intervention: a significant reduction of 52.0% (P = 0.020). There were 37 fewer admissions of the survivors from that cohort post-intervention than in the preceding 12 months, with a significant reduction of 42.5% (P = 0.002). Mortality rates in the two cohorts were similar, but the number of patients who died in hospital and the hospital bed days used in the last 3 months of life were significantly lower for the decedents with an ACP than for the controls who had died (P = 0.007 and P = 0.045 respectively). CONCLUSION: This approach produced statistically significant reductions in unplanned hospitalisation for a cohort of patients with multiple morbidities. It demonstrates the potential for providing better care for patients as well as better value for health and social care services. It is of particular benefit in managing end-of-life care.
Authors: Hugh Gravelle; Mark Dusheiko; Rod Sheaff; Penny Sargent; Ruth Boaden; Susan Pickard; Stuart Parker; Martin Roland Journal: BMJ Date: 2006-11-15
Authors: Cathy Shipman; Marjolein Gysels; Patrick White; Allison Worth; Scott A Murray; Stephen Barclay; Sarah Forrest; Jonathan Shepherd; Jeremy Dale; Steve Dewar; Marilyn Peters; Suzanne White; Alison Richardson; Karl Lorenz; Jonathan Koffman; Irene J Higginson Journal: BMJ Date: 2008-10-01
Authors: Dyfed W Huws; Deborah Cashmore; Robert G Newcombe; Catherine Roberts; Judith Vincent; Glyn Elwyn Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2008-05-29 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Cathy A Maxwell; Russell Rothman; Ruth Wolever; Sandra Simmons; Mary S Dietrich; Richard Miller; Mayur Patel; Mohana B Karlekar; Sheila Ridner Journal: Geriatr Nurs Date: 2020-07-22 Impact factor: 2.361
Authors: Bruce Mason; Eleni Epiphaniou; Veronica Nanton; Anne Donaldson; Cathy Shipman; Barbara A Daveson; Richard Harding; Irene Higginson; Dan Munday; Stephen Barclay; Kirsty Boyd; Jeremy Dale; Marilyn Kendall; Allison Worth; Scott A Murray Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2013-08 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Martin Roland; Richard Lewis; Adam Steventon; Gary Abel; John Adams; Martin Bardsley; Laura Brereton; Xavier Chitnis; Annalijn Conklin; Laura Staetsky; Sarah Tunkel; Tom Ling Journal: Int J Integr Care Date: 2012-07-24 Impact factor: 5.120