BACKGROUND: Coordination of care for individuals with advanced progressive conditions is frequently poor. AIM: To identify how care is coordinated in generalist settings for individuals with advanced progressive conditions in the last year of life. DESIGN AND SETTING: A mixed methods study of three UK generalist clinical settings producing three parallel case studies: an acute admissions unit in a regional hospital, a large general practice, and a respiratory outpatient service. METHOD: Ethnographic observations in each setting, followed by serial interviews of patients with advanced progressive conditions and their family carers in the community. A spectrum of clinicians and healthcare workers were also interviewed. RESULTS: Ethnographic observations were conducted for 22 weeks. A total of 56 patients, 25 family carers and 17 clinicians yielded 198 interviews. Very few participants had been identified for a palliative approach. Rapid throughput of hospital patients and time pressures in primary care hindered identification of palliative care needs. Lack of care coordination was evident during emergency admissions and discharges. Patient, families, and professionals identified multiple problems relating to lack of information, communication, and collaboration at care transitions. Family carers or specialist nurses, where present, usually acted as the main care coordinators. CONCLUSION: Care is poorly coordinated in generalist settings for patients in the last year of life, although those with cancer have better coordinated care than other patients. A model to improve coordination of care for all individuals approaching the end of life must ensure that patients are identified in a timely way, so that they can be assessed and their care planned accordingly.
BACKGROUND: Coordination of care for individuals with advanced progressive conditions is frequently poor. AIM: To identify how care is coordinated in generalist settings for individuals with advanced progressive conditions in the last year of life. DESIGN AND SETTING: A mixed methods study of three UK generalist clinical settings producing three parallel case studies: an acute admissions unit in a regional hospital, a large general practice, and a respiratory outpatient service. METHOD: Ethnographic observations in each setting, followed by serial interviews of patients with advanced progressive conditions and their family carers in the community. A spectrum of clinicians and healthcare workers were also interviewed. RESULTS: Ethnographic observations were conducted for 22 weeks. A total of 56 patients, 25 family carers and 17 clinicians yielded 198 interviews. Very few participants had been identified for a palliative approach. Rapid throughput of hospital patients and time pressures in primary care hindered identification of palliative care needs. Lack of care coordination was evident during emergency admissions and discharges. Patient, families, and professionals identified multiple problems relating to lack of information, communication, and collaboration at care transitions. Family carers or specialist nurses, where present, usually acted as the main care coordinators. CONCLUSION: Care is poorly coordinated in generalist settings for patients in the last year of life, although those with cancer have better coordinated care than other patients. A model to improve coordination of care for all individuals approaching the end of life must ensure that patients are identified in a timely way, so that they can be assessed and their care planned accordingly.
Authors: Scott A Murray; Marilyn Kendall; Emma Carduff; Allison Worth; Fiona M Harris; Anna Lloyd; Debbie Cavers; Liz Grant; Aziz Sheikh Journal: BMJ Date: 2009-09-28
Authors: Jennifer Walsh; James D Harrison; Jane M Young; Phyllis N Butow; Michael J Solomon; Lindy Masya Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2010-05-20 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Cathy Shipman; Marjolein Gysels; Patrick White; Allison Worth; Scott A Murray; Stephen Barclay; Sarah Forrest; Jonathan Shepherd; Jeremy Dale; Steve Dewar; Marilyn Peters; Suzanne White; Alison Richardson; Karl Lorenz; Jonathan Koffman; Irene J Higginson Journal: BMJ Date: 2008-10-01
Authors: Sarah Drew; Andrew Judge; Carl May; Andrew Farmer; Cyrus Cooper; M Kassim Javaid; Rachael Gooberman-Hill Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2015-04-23 Impact factor: 7.327
Authors: Barbara A Daveson; Richard Harding; Cathy Shipman; Bruce L Mason; Eleni Epiphaniou; Irene J Higginson; Clare Ellis-Smith; Lesley Henson; Dan Munday; Veronica Nanton; Jeremy R Dale; Kirsty Boyd; Allison Worth; Stephen Barclay; Anne Donaldson; Scott Murray Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-05-02 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Gavin Daker-White; Rebecca Hays; Aneez Esmail; Brian Minor; Wendy Barlow; Benjamin Brown; Thomas Blakeman; Peter Bower Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2014-08-18 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Rosemary Simmonds; Margaret Glogowska; Sarah McLachlan; Helen Cramer; Tom Sanders; Rachel Johnson; Umesh Kadam; Daniel Lasserson; Sarah Purdy Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2015-10-19 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Bruce Mason; Susan Buckingham; Anne Finucane; Peter Hutchison; Marilyn Kendall; Hazel McCutcheon; Lorna Porteous; Scott A Murray Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2015-12-10 Impact factor: 2.497
Authors: Emma Carduff; Anne Finucane; Marilyn Kendall; Alison Jarvis; Nadine Harrison; Jane Greenacre; Scott A Murray Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2014-04-02 Impact factor: 2.497