BACKGROUND: The number of patients undergoing implantation of a HeartMate II left ventricular assist device (LVAD; Thoratec Corporation, Pleasanton, Calif) is rising. Ventricular tachyarrhythmia (VA) after placement of the device is common, especially among patients with preoperative VA. We sought to determine whether intraoperative cryoablation in select patients reduces the incidence of postoperative VA. METHODS: From January 2009 through September 2010, 50 consecutive patients undergoing implantation of the HeartMate II LVAD were examined. Fourteen of these patients had recurrent preoperative VA. Of those patients with recurrent VA, half underwent intraoperative cryoablation (Cryo: n = 7) and half did not (NoCryo: n = 7). Intraoperatively, patients underwent localized epicardial and endocardial cryoablation via LVAD ventriculotomy. Cryothermal lesions were created to connect scar to fixed anatomic borders in the region of clinical VA. Demographics, risk factors, intraoperative features, and outcomes were analyzed to investigate the feasibility of cryoablation. RESULTS: Thirty-day mortality remained low (n = 1, 2%) among all LVAD recipients. There were no differences in risk factors between groups except that preoperative inotropes were less prevalent in Cryo patients (P = .09). Compared with NoCryo, the Cryo group had significantly decreased postoperative resource use and complications (P < .05). Recurrent postoperative VA did not develop in any of the Cryo patients (P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative VA can be minimized by preoperative risk assessment and intraoperative treatment. Localized cryoablation in select patients offers promising early feasibility when performed during HeartMate II LVAD implantation. Further prospective analysis is required to investigate this novel approach.
BACKGROUND: The number of patients undergoing implantation of a HeartMate II left ventricular assist device (LVAD; Thoratec Corporation, Pleasanton, Calif) is rising. Ventricular tachyarrhythmia (VA) after placement of the device is common, especially among patients with preoperative VA. We sought to determine whether intraoperative cryoablation in select patients reduces the incidence of postoperative VA. METHODS: From January 2009 through September 2010, 50 consecutive patients undergoing implantation of the HeartMate II LVAD were examined. Fourteen of these patients had recurrent preoperative VA. Of those patients with recurrent VA, half underwent intraoperative cryoablation (Cryo: n = 7) and half did not (NoCryo: n = 7). Intraoperatively, patients underwent localized epicardial and endocardial cryoablation via LVAD ventriculotomy. Cryothermal lesions were created to connect scar to fixed anatomic borders in the region of clinical VA. Demographics, risk factors, intraoperative features, and outcomes were analyzed to investigate the feasibility of cryoablation. RESULTS: Thirty-day mortality remained low (n = 1, 2%) among all LVAD recipients. There were no differences in risk factors between groups except that preoperative inotropes were less prevalent in Cryo patients (P = .09). Compared with NoCryo, the Cryo group had significantly decreased postoperative resource use and complications (P < .05). Recurrent postoperative VA did not develop in any of the Cryo patients (P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative VA can be minimized by preoperative risk assessment and intraoperative treatment. Localized cryoablation in select patients offers promising early feasibility when performed during HeartMate II LVAD implantation. Further prospective analysis is required to investigate this novel approach.
Authors: Edmond M Cronin; Frank M Bogun; Philippe Maury; Petr Peichl; Minglong Chen; Narayanan Namboodiri; Luis Aguinaga; Luiz Roberto Leite; Sana M Al-Khatib; Elad Anter; Antonio Berruezo; David J Callans; Mina K Chung; Phillip Cuculich; Andre d'Avila; Barbara J Deal; Paolo Della Bella; Thomas Deneke; Timm-Michael Dickfeld; Claudio Hadid; Haris M Haqqani; G Neal Kay; Rakesh Latchamsetty; Francis Marchlinski; John M Miller; Akihiko Nogami; Akash R Patel; Rajeev Kumar Pathak; Luis C Saenz Morales; Pasquale Santangeli; John L Sapp; Andrea Sarkozy; Kyoko Soejima; William G Stevenson; Usha B Tedrow; Wendy S Tzou; Niraj Varma; Katja Zeppenfeld Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2020-10 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Chris Healy; Juan F Viles-Gonzalez; Frederic Sacher; James O Coffey; Andre d'Avila Journal: Curr Cardiol Rep Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 2.931
Authors: Edmond M Cronin; Frank M Bogun; Philippe Maury; Petr Peichl; Minglong Chen; Narayanan Namboodiri; Luis Aguinaga; Luiz Roberto Leite; Sana M Al-Khatib; Elad Anter; Antonio Berruezo; David J Callans; Mina K Chung; Phillip Cuculich; Andre d'Avila; Barbara J Deal; Paolo Della Bella; Thomas Deneke; Timm-Michael Dickfeld; Claudio Hadid; Haris M Haqqani; G Neal Kay; Rakesh Latchamsetty; Francis Marchlinski; John M Miller; Akihiko Nogami; Akash R Patel; Rajeev Kumar Pathak; Luis C Sáenz Morales; Pasquale Santangeli; John L Sapp; Andrea Sarkozy; Kyoko Soejima; William G Stevenson; Usha B Tedrow; Wendy S Tzou; Niraj Varma; Katja Zeppenfeld Journal: Europace Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 5.214
Authors: Nicholas McNamara; Harry Narroway; Michael Williams; John Brookes; James Farag; David Cistulli; Paul Bannon; Silvana Marasco; Evgenij Potapov; Antonio Loforte Journal: Ann Cardiothorac Surg Date: 2021-03