Literature DB >> 22519976

The cofactor preference of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase from Escherichia coli--modeling the physiological production of reduced cofactors.

Karel Olavarría1, Diego Valdés, Ricardo Cabrera.   

Abstract

In Escherichia coli, the pentose phosphate pathway is one of the main sources of NADPH. The first enzyme of the pathway, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PDH), is generally considered an exclusive NADPH producer, but a rigorous assessment of cofactor preference has yet to be reported. In this work, the specificity constants for NADP and NAD for G6PDH were determined using a pure enzyme preparation. Absence of the phosphate group on the cofactor leads to a 410-fold reduction in the performance of the enzyme. Furthermore, the contribution of the phosphate group to binding of the transition state to the active site was calculated to be 3.6 kcal·mol(-1). In order to estimate the main kinetic parameters for NAD(P) and NAD(P)H, we used the classical initial-rates approach, together with an analysis of reaction time courses. To achieve this, we developed a new analytical solution to the integrated Michaelis-Menten equation by including the effect of competitive product inhibition using the ω-function. With reference to relevant kinetic parameters and intracellular metabolite concentrations reported by others, we modeled the sensitivity of reduced cofactor production by G6PDH as a function of the redox ratios of NAD/NADH (rR(NAD)) and NADP/NADPH (rR(NADP)). Our analysis shows that NADPH production sharply increases within the range of thermodynamically feasible values of rR(NADP), but NADH production remains low within the range feasible for rR(NAD). Nevertheless, we show that certain combinations of rR(NADP) and rR(NAD) sustain greater levels of NADH production over NADPH.
© 2012 The Authors Journal compilation © 2012 FEBS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22519976     DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2012.08610.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  FEBS J        ISSN: 1742-464X            Impact factor:   5.542


  10 in total

1.  Revealing the Metabolic Flexibility of "Candidatus Accumulibacter phosphatis" through Redox Cofactor Analysis and Metabolic Network Modeling.

Authors:  Leonor Guedes da Silva; Karel Olavarria Gamez; Joana Castro Gomes; Kasper Akkermans; Laurens Welles; Ben Abbas; Mark C M van Loosdrecht; Sebastian Aljoscha Wahl
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Stromal NADH supplied by PHOSPHOGLYCERATE DEHYDROGENASE3 is crucial for photosynthetic performance.

Authors:  Ricarda Höhner; Philip M Day; Sandra E Zimmermann; Laura S Lopez; Moritz Krämer; Patrick Giavalisco; Viviana Correa Galvis; Ute Armbruster; Mark Aurel Schöttler; Peter Jahns; Stephan Krueger; Hans-Henning Kunz
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  Enhancing the light-driven production of D-lactate by engineering cyanobacterium using a combinational strategy.

Authors:  Chao Li; Fei Tao; Jun Ni; Yu Wang; Feng Yao; Ping Xu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Determinants of Cofactor Specificity for the Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase from Escherichia coli: Simulation, Kinetics and Evolutionary Studies.

Authors:  Matias Fuentealba; Rodrigo Muñoz; Pablo Maturana; Adriana Krapp; Ricardo Cabrera
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Co-production of hydrogen and ethanol from glucose in Escherichia coli by activation of pentose-phosphate pathway through deletion of phosphoglucose isomerase (pgi) and overexpression of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (zwf) and 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase (gnd).

Authors:  Balaji Sundara Sekar; Eunhee Seol; Sunghoon Park
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 6.040

6.  Free spermidine evokes superoxide radicals that manifest toxicity.

Authors:  Vineet Kumar; Rajesh Kumar Mishra; Debarghya Ghose; Arunima Kalita; Pulkit Dhiman; Anand Prakash; Nirja Thakur; Gopa Mitra; Vinod D Chaudhari; Amit Arora; Dipak Dutta
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 8.713

Review 7.  NADPH-generating systems in bacteria and archaea.

Authors:  Sebastiaan K Spaans; Ruud A Weusthuis; John van der Oost; Servé W M Kengen
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  Quantifying NAD(P)H production in the upper Entner-Doudoroff pathway from Pseudomonas putida KT2440.

Authors:  Karel Olavarria; Marina Pupke Marone; Henrique da Costa Oliveira; Juan Camilo Roncallo; Fernanda Nogales da Costa Vasconcelos; Luiziana Ferreira da Silva; José Gregório Cabrera Gomez
Journal:  FEBS Open Bio       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 2.693

Review 9.  Investigating mitochondrial redox state using NADH and NADPH autofluorescence.

Authors:  Thomas S Blacker; Michael R Duchen
Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 7.376

10.  Conditional impairment of Coxiella burnetii by glucose-6P dehydrogenase activity.

Authors:  Savannah E Sanchez; Anders Omsland
Journal:  Pathog Dis       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 3.166

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.