Literature DB >> 22516444

Coronary arterial 18F-sodium fluoride uptake: a novel marker of plaque biology.

Marc R Dweck1, Marcus W L Chow, Nikhil V Joshi, Michelle C Williams, Charlotte Jones, Alison M Fletcher, Hamish Richardson, Audrey White, Graham McKillop, Edwin J R van Beek, Nicholas A Boon, James H F Rudd, David E Newby.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: With combined positron emission tomography and computed tomography (CT), we investigated coronary arterial uptake of 18F-sodium fluoride (18F-NaF) and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) as markers of active plaque calcification and inflammation, respectively.
BACKGROUND: The noninvasive assessment of coronary artery plaque biology would be a major advance particularly in the identification of vulnerable plaques, which are associated with specific pathological characteristics, including micro-calcification and inflammation.
METHODS: We prospectively recruited 119 volunteers (72 ± 8 years of age, 68% men) with and without aortic valve disease and measured their coronary calcium score and 18F-NaF and 18F-FDG uptake. Patients with a calcium score of 0 were used as control subjects and compared with those with calcific atherosclerosis (calcium score >0).
RESULTS: Inter-observer repeatability of coronary 18F-NaF uptake measurements (maximum tissue/background ratio) was excellent (intra-class coefficient 0.99). Activity was higher in patients with coronary atherosclerosis (n = 106) versus control subjects (1.64 ± 0.49 vs. 1.23 ± 0.24; p = 0.003) and correlated with the calcium score (r = 0.652, p < 0.001), although 40% of those with scores >1,000 displayed normal uptake. Patients with increased coronary 18F-NaF activity (n = 40) had higher rates of prior cardiovascular events (p = 0.016) and angina (p = 0.023) and higher Framingham risk scores (p = 0.011). Quantification of coronary 18F-FDG uptake was hampered by myocardial activity and was not increased in patients with atherosclerosis versus control subjects (p = 0.498).
CONCLUSIONS: 18F-NaF is a promising new approach for the assessment of coronary artery plaque biology. Prospective studies with clinical outcomes are now needed to assess whether coronary 18F-NaF uptake represents a novel marker of plaque vulnerability, recent plaque rupture, and future cardiovascular risk. (An Observational PET/CT Study Examining the Role of Active Valvular Calcification and Inflammation in Patients With Aortic Stenosis; NCT01358513).
Copyright © 2012 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22516444     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.12.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  173 in total

Review 1.  Determination of the Input Function at the Entry of the Tissue of Interest and Its Impact on PET Kinetic Modeling Parameters.

Authors:  M'hamed Bentourkia
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  18F-Sodium Fluoride PET Imaging Passes an Important Milestone Toward Noninvasive Prediction of Clinical Events.

Authors:  Zahi A Fayad; Philip M Robson
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  CD80 Is Upregulated in a Mouse Model with Shear Stress-Induced Atherosclerosis and Allows for Evaluating CD80-Targeting PET Tracers.

Authors:  Romana Meletta; Larissa Steier; Nicole Borel; Linjing Mu; Claudia Keller; Aristeidis Chiotellis; Erica Russo; Cornelia Halin; Simon M Ametamey; Roger Schibli; Stefanie D Krämer; Adrienne Müller Herde
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 4.  Frontiers in positron emission tomography imaging of the vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque.

Authors:  Mark G MacAskill; David E Newby; Adriana A S Tavares
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 10.787

5.  Divergent determinants of 18F-NaF uptake and visible calcium deposition in large arteries: relationship with Framingham risk score.

Authors:  Silvia Morbelli; Francesco Fiz; Arnoldo Piccardo; Lorena Picori; Michela Massollo; Emanuela Pestarino; Cecilia Marini; Manlio Cabria; Alessia Democrito; Giuseppe Cittadini; Giampiero Villavecchia; Paolo Bruzzi; Abass Alavi; Gianmario Sambuceti
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-12-08       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 6.  Multimodality imaging for the prevention of cardiovascular events: Coronary artery calcium and beyond.

Authors:  Duygu Kocyigit; Alexandra Scanameo; Bo Xu
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2021-06

Review 7.  Molecular imaging in cardiovascular disease: Which methods, which diseases?

Authors:  Jonathan R Lindner; Albert Sinusas
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 8.  Imaging of inflammation and calcification in aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Marc R Dweck; Nikhil V Joshi; James H F Rudd; David E Newby
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.931

9.  F-18 sodium fluoride PET/CT does not effectively image myocardial inflammation due to suspected cardiac sarcoidosis.

Authors:  Richard L Weinberg; Rachelle Morgenstern; Albert DeLuca; Jennifer Chen; Sabahat Bokhari
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 5.952

10.  Dual-Modality Activity-Based Probes as Molecular Imaging Agents for Vascular Inflammation.

Authors:  Nimali P Withana; Toshinobu Saito; Xiaowei Ma; Megan Garland; Changhao Liu; Hisanori Kosuge; Myriam Amsallem; Martijn Verdoes; Leslie O Ofori; Michael Fischbein; Mamoru Arakawa; Zhen Cheng; Michael V McConnell; Matthew Bogyo
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 10.057

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.