BACKGROUND: Over 40% of children with cancer have reported that chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) are the two most distressing side-effects of treatment even when antiemetic drugs have been used. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this article is to report the findings from a feasibility and pilot study using auricular point acupressure point for CINV in a small group of children in Taiwan. METHODS: This was a crossover randomized design study. CINV symptoms were assessed on 10 patients just prior to and for 7 days following each of three rounds of chemotherapy drugs (CTX). They received standard care (SC) and were not entered into a test treatment group until they completed the baseline assessment, which was conducted during their first round of chemotherapy after entering the study. Just prior to receiving the second round of CTX, patients were randomized into one of two treatment conditions: auricular acupressure intervention, in addition to standard care (AAP) or auricular acupressure using sham auricular points (SAP) in addition to standard care. For the third round of CTX, they were switched to the other treatment group. RESULTS: The enrollment rate for this study was 77% of the children invited to participate and of those, 88% provided completed data sets for all three treatment conditions. Patients in the AAP group reported significantly lower occurrence and severity of nausea and vomiting than patients in the SC group (p<0.05). There were no significant differences of nausea and vomiting for patients between the AAP and SAP groups. All of the patients took antiemetic medication on the day they received CTX, and 80% of patients reported that the antiemetics did not help to treat CINV. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary findings did show evidence that AAP is acceptable to the children and their parents to prevent/treat CINV. However, there were no statistically significant differences between the AAP and SAP groups in the prevention/treatment of CINV. There were clinical trend differences between the groups, which may due to the small sample size. In a larger study, it would be important to determine whether the effects of the AAP and SAP treatment are independent of any psychologic effects, such as the researcher's increased presence in both treatment groups.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Over 40% of children with cancer have reported that chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) are the two most distressing side-effects of treatment even when antiemetic drugs have been used. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this article is to report the findings from a feasibility and pilot study using auricular point acupressure point for CINV in a small group of children in Taiwan. METHODS: This was a crossover randomized design study. CINV symptoms were assessed on 10 patients just prior to and for 7 days following each of three rounds of chemotherapy drugs (CTX). They received standard care (SC) and were not entered into a test treatment group until they completed the baseline assessment, which was conducted during their first round of chemotherapy after entering the study. Just prior to receiving the second round of CTX, patients were randomized into one of two treatment conditions: auricular acupressure intervention, in addition to standard care (AAP) or auricular acupressure using sham auricular points (SAP) in addition to standard care. For the third round of CTX, they were switched to the other treatment group. RESULTS: The enrollment rate for this study was 77% of the children invited to participate and of those, 88% provided completed data sets for all three treatment conditions. Patients in the AAP group reported significantly lower occurrence and severity of nausea and vomiting than patients in the SC group (p<0.05). There were no significant differences of nausea and vomiting for patients between the AAP and SAP groups. All of the patients took antiemetic medication on the day they received CTX, and 80% of patients reported that the antiemetics did not help to treat CINV. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary findings did show evidence that AAP is acceptable to the children and their parents to prevent/treat CINV. However, there were no statistically significant differences between the AAP and SAP groups in the prevention/treatment of CINV. There were clinical trend differences between the groups, which may due to the small sample size. In a larger study, it would be important to determine whether the effects of the AAP and SAP treatment are independent of any psychologic effects, such as the researcher's increased presence in both treatment groups.
Authors: Claire Shuiqing Zhang; Angela Weihong Yang; Anthony Lin Zhang; Brian H May; Charlie Changli Xue Journal: J Altern Complement Med Date: 2013-10-19 Impact factor: 2.579
Authors: L Lee Dupuis; Kara M Kelly; Jeffrey P Krischer; Anne-Marie Langevin; Roy N Tamura; Ping Xu; Lu Chen; E Anders Kolb; Nicole J Ullrich; Olle Jane Z Sahler; Eleanor Hendershot; Ann Stratton; Lillian Sung; Thomas W McLean Journal: Cancer Date: 2017-12-19 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: L Lee Dupuis; Lillian Sung; Alexander Molassiotis; Andrea D Orsey; Wim Tissing; Marianne van de Wetering Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2016-08-26 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Jing-Yu Tan; Alexander Molassiotis; Tao Wang; Lorna K P Suen Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med Date: 2014-11-10 Impact factor: 2.629
Authors: Jing-Yu Tan; Alexander Molassiotis; Tao Wang; Lorna K P Suen Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med Date: 2014-11-25 Impact factor: 2.629
Authors: Chao Hsing Yeh; Lung Chang Chien; Devora Balaban; Rebecca Sponberg; Jaclyn Primavera; Natalia E Morone; Ronald Glick; Kathryn M Albers; Susan M Cohen; Dianxu Ren; Li Chun Huang; Lorna Kwai-Ping Suen Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med Date: 2013-02-28 Impact factor: 2.629