AIM: The aim of the study was to report the first thorough characterization of the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of epoprostenol in an integrated manner. METHOD: Twenty healthy male subjects receivedtwo formulations of i.v. epoprostenol, in a crossover design, in sequential infusions of 2, 4, 6 and 8 ng kg(-1) min(-1) for 2 h each. A sensitive assay was developed which allowed accurate PK characterization of epoprostenol via analysis of the concentration-time profiles of its two primary metabolites, 6-keto-prostacyclin F(1α) and 6,15-diketo-13,14-dihydro-prostacyclin F(1α) . PD parameters included cardiac output (CO), cardiac index (CIn) and heart rate (HR). RESULTS: The pharmacokinetics of epoprostenol deviated slightly from dose-proportionality, probably due to a food effect. After infusion of the two formulations of epoprostenol, the t(1/2) values expressed as geometric mean (95% confidence interval) were 0.25 h (0.14, 0.46) and 0.22 h (0.13, 0.38) for 6-keto-prostacyclin F(1α) , and 0.32 h (0.22, 0.45) and 0.34 h (0.26, 0.46) for 6,15-diketo-13,14-dihydro-prostacyclin F(1α) . A single compartment infusion model with first order elimination adequately described the PK of 6-keto-prostacyclin F(1α) . This model also characterized the food effect. Stepwise infusions with epoprostenol resulted in a progressive increase in CO, CIn and HR. CONCLUSION: Of the two metabolites analyzed, the appearance of 6-keto-prostacyclin F(1α) in plasma was more closely associated with the haemodynamic effects of i.v. epoprostenol. PK and PD profiles showed that CIn relates proportionally and linearly to the plasma concentrations of 6-keto-prostacyclin F(1α) . These results suggest that 6-keto-prostacyclin F(1α) is a suitable surrogate marker of plasma concentrations of epoprostenol.
RCT Entities:
AIM: The aim of the study was to report the first thorough characterization of the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of epoprostenol in an integrated manner. METHOD: Twenty healthy male subjects received two formulations of i.v. epoprostenol, in a crossover design, in sequential infusions of 2, 4, 6 and 8 ng kg(-1) min(-1) for 2 h each. A sensitive assay was developed which allowed accurate PK characterization of epoprostenol via analysis of the concentration-time profiles of its two primary metabolites, 6-keto-prostacyclin F(1α) and 6,15-diketo-13,14-dihydro-prostacyclin F(1α) . PD parameters included cardiac output (CO), cardiac index (CIn) and heart rate (HR). RESULTS: The pharmacokinetics of epoprostenol deviated slightly from dose-proportionality, probably due to a food effect. After infusion of the two formulations of epoprostenol, the t(1/2) values expressed as geometric mean (95% confidence interval) were 0.25 h (0.14, 0.46) and 0.22 h (0.13, 0.38) for 6-keto-prostacyclin F(1α) , and 0.32 h (0.22, 0.45) and 0.34 h (0.26, 0.46) for 6,15-diketo-13,14-dihydro-prostacyclin F(1α) . A single compartment infusion model with first order elimination adequately described the PK of 6-keto-prostacyclin F(1α) . This model also characterized the food effect. Stepwise infusions with epoprostenol resulted in a progressive increase in CO, CIn and HR. CONCLUSION: Of the two metabolites analyzed, the appearance of 6-keto-prostacyclin F(1α) in plasma was more closely associated with the haemodynamic effects of i.v. epoprostenol. PK and PD profiles showed that CIn relates proportionally and linearly to the plasma concentrations of 6-keto-prostacyclin F(1α) . These results suggest that 6-keto-prostacyclin F(1α) is a suitable surrogate marker of plasma concentrations of epoprostenol.
Authors: N Whittaker; S Bunting; J Salmon; S Moncada; J R Vane; R A Johnson; D R Morton; J H Kinner; R R Gorman; J C McGuire; F F Sun Journal: Prostaglandins Date: 1976-12
Authors: Marc Humbert; Nicholas W Morrell; Stephen L Archer; Kurt R Stenmark; Margaret R MacLean; Irene M Lang; Brian W Christman; E Kenneth Weir; Oliver Eickelberg; Norbert F Voelkel; Marlene Rabinovitch Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2004-06-16 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Roald J Roeleveld; Anton Vonk-Noordegraaf; J Tim Marcus; Jean G F Bronzwaer; Koen M J Marques; Pieter E Postmus; Anco Boonstra Journal: Chest Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Hille Kisch-Wedel; Gregor Kemming; Franz Meisner; Michael Flondor; Wolfgang M Kuebler; Sebastian Bruhn; Carolina Koehler; Bernhard Zwissler Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2003-08-08 Impact factor: 17.440