Literature DB >> 22513649

Effect of vertebroplasty on pain relief, quality of life, and the incidence of new vertebral fractures: a 12-month randomized follow-up, controlled trial.

Jordi Blasco1, Angeles Martinez-Ferrer, Juan Macho, Luis San Roman, Jaume Pomés, Josep Carrasco, Ana Monegal, Nuria Guañabens, Pilar Peris.   

Abstract

Uncertainty regarding the benefits of vertebroplasty (VP) for the treatment of acute osteoporotic vertebral fractures has recently arisen. A prospective, controlled, randomized single-center trial (ClinicalTrials.gov registration number NCT00994032) was designed to compare the effects of VP versus conservative treatment on the quality of life and pain in patients with painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures, new fractures and secondary adverse effects were also analyzed during a 12-month follow-up period. A total of 125 patients were randomly assigned to receive conservative treatment or VP. The primary end point was to compare the evolution of the quality of life (Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis [Qualeffo-41] and pain (Visual Analogue Scale [VAS]) during a 12 month follow-up. Secondary outcomes included comparison of analgesic consumption, clinical complications, and radiological vertebral fractures at the same time points. Both arms showed significant improvement in VAS scores at all time points, with greater improvement (p = 0.035) in the VP group at the 2-month follow-up. Significant improvement in Qualeffo total score was seen in the VP group throughout the study, whereas this was not seen in the conservative treatment arm until the 6-month follow-up. VP treatment was associated with a significantly increased incidence of vertebral fractures (odds ratio [OR], 2 · 78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-7.62, p = 0.0462). VP and conservative treatment are both associated with significant improvement in pain and quality of life in patients with painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures over a 1-year follow-up period. VP achieved faster pain relief with significant improvement in the pain score at the 2-month follow-up but was associated with a higher incidence in vertebral fractures.
Copyright © 2012 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22513649     DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.1564

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  53 in total

1.  Vertebral fractures cascade: potential causes and risk factors.

Authors:  H Che; V Breuil; B Cortet; J Paccou; T Thomas; L Chapuis; F Debiais; N Mehsen-Cetre; R M Javier; S Loiseau Peres; C Roux; K Briot
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  New vertebral fractures after vertebroplasty: 2-year results from a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  M P Staples; B M Howe; M D Ringler; P Mitchell; C H R Wriedt; J D Wark; P R Ebeling; R H Osborne; D F Kallmes; R Buchbinder
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 2.617

3.  Can Internet information on vertebroplasty be a reliable means of patient self-education?

Authors:  T Barrett Sullivan; Joshua T Anderson; Uri M Ahn; Nicholas U Ahn
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  Percutaneous Vertebral Augmentation Techniques in Osteoporotic and Traumatic Fractures.

Authors:  Valérie Bousson; Bassam Hamze; Guillaume Odri; Thomas Funck-Brentano; Philippe Orcel; Jean-Denis Laredo
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 1.513

5.  Vertebral augmentation reduces the 12-month mortality and morbidity in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.

Authors:  Roberto Luigi Cazzato; Teodora Bellone; Marco Scardapane; Pierre De Marini; Pierre-Alexis Autrusseau; Pierre Auloge; Julien Garnon; Jack W Jennings; Afshin Gangi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Reply to letter to the editor: Is there really no benefit of vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral fractures? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ming-Min Shi; Shi-Gui Yan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Is vertebroplasty a risk factor for subsequent vertebral fracture, meta-analysis of published evidence?

Authors:  S L Han; S L Wan; Q T Li; D T Xu; H M Zang; N J Chen; L Y Chen; W P Zhang; C Luan; F Yang; Z W Xu
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-08-23       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 8.  What is the role of vertebral augmentation for osteoporotic fractures? A review of the recent literature.

Authors:  Stefano Marcia; Mario Muto; Joshua A Hirsch; Ronil V Chandra; Nicole Carter; Paola Crivelli; Emanuele Piras; Luca Saba
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 2.804

9.  Augmentation of implant fixation in osteoporotic bone.

Authors:  Clifford B Jones
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 5.096

10.  ASA III osteoporotic fracture in 62 patients treated with vertebroplasty under local anesthesia.

Authors:  Tuluhan Yunus Emre; H Bahadır Gökcen; Zafer Atbaşı; Gülis Kavadar; Meriç Enercan; Cagatay Ozturk
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2015-09-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.