Literature DB >> 22513271

The influence of age at menarche on cross-sectional geometry of bone in young adulthood.

Maja Sešelj1, Ramzi W Nahhas, Richard J Sherwood, Wm Cameron Chumlea, Bradford Towne, Dana L Duren.   

Abstract

Elucidating the somatic and maturational influences on the biomechanical properties of bone in children is crucial for a proper understanding of bone strength and quality in childhood and later life, and has significant potential for predicting adult fracture and osteoporosis risks. The ability of a long bone to resist bending and torsion is primarily a function of its cross-sectional geometric properties, and is negatively impacted by smaller external bone diameter. In pubescent girls, elevated levels of estrogen impede subperiosteal bone growth and increase endosteal bone deposition, resulting in bones averaging a smaller external and internal diameter relative to boys. In addition, given a well-documented secular trend for an earlier menarche, the age at which the rate of subperiosteal bone deposition decreases may also be younger in more recent cohorts of girls. In this study we examined the relationship between pubertal timing and subsequent bone strength in girls. Specifically, we investigated the effects of age at menarche on bone strength indicators (polar moment of inertia and section modulus) determined from cross-sectional geometry of the second metacarpal (MC2) using data derived from serial hand-wrist radiographs of female participants (N=223) in the Fels Longitudinal Study, with repeated measures of MC2 between the ages of 7 and 35 years. Using multivariate regression models, we evaluated the effects of age at menarche on associations between measures of bone strength in early adulthood and the same measures at a prepubertal age. Results indicate that later age at menarche is associated with stronger adult bone (in torsion and bending) when controlling for prepubertal bone strength (R(2) ranged between 0.54 and 0.70, p<0.001). Since cross-sectional properties of bone in childhood may have long lasting implications, they should be considered along with pubertal timing in assessing risk for future fracture and in clinical recommendations.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22513271      PMCID: PMC3584571          DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2012.03.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  55 in total

1.  The age of puberty determines sexual dimorphism in bone structure: a male/female co-twin control study.

Authors:  Sandra Iuliano-Burns; John Hopper; Ego Seeman
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2009-03-03       Impact factor: 5.958

2.  Age-related cortical bone loss at the metacarpal.

Authors:  D Maggio; R Pacifici; A Cherubini; G Simonelli; M Luchetti; M C Aisa; D Cucinotta; S Adami; U Senin
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.333

3.  Risk factors for hip fracture in a Japanese cohort.

Authors:  S Fujiwara; F Kasagi; M Yamada; K Kodama
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  Metacarpal bone mass in normal and osteoporotic Japanese women using computed X-ray densitometry.

Authors:  C Matsumoto; K Kushida; K Yamazaki; K Imose; T Inoue
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 4.333

5.  Assessment of the risk of post-menopausal osteoporosis using clinical factors.

Authors:  C Ribot; J M Pouilles; M Bonneu; F Tremollieres
Journal:  Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 3.478

6.  Cortical porosity is higher in boys compared with girls at the distal radius and distal tibia during pubertal growth: an HR-pQCT study.

Authors:  Kyle K Nishiyama; Heather M Macdonald; Sarah A Moore; Tak Fung; Steven K Boyd; Heather A McKay
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  The effect of gynecological risk factors on lumbar and femoral bone mineral density in peri- and postmenopausal women.

Authors:  M Tuppurainen; H Kröger; S Saarikoski; R Honkanen; E Alhava
Journal:  Maturitas       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Influence of body composition on bone mineral content in children and adolescents.

Authors:  P Manzoni; P Brambilla; A Pietrobelli; L Beccaria; A Bianchessi; S Mora; G Chiumello
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 7.045

9.  Risk factors for hip fracture in European women: the MEDOS Study. Mediterranean Osteoporosis Study.

Authors:  O Johnell; B Gullberg; J A Kanis; E Allander; L Elffors; J Dequeker; G Dilsen; C Gennari; A Lopes Vaz; G Lyritis
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Relation of early menarche to high bone mineral density.

Authors:  M Ito; M Yamada; K Hayashi; M Ohki; M Uetani; T Nakamura
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.333

View more
  6 in total

1.  Relationships Between Age at Menarche, Walking Gait Base of Support, and Stance Phase Frontal Plane Knee Biomechanics in Adolescent Girls.

Authors:  Andrew W Froehle; Kimberly A Grannis; Richard J Sherwood; Dana L Duren
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2016-07-30       Impact factor: 2.298

2.  Sex-specific regulation of weight and puberty by the Lin28/let-7 axis.

Authors:  Christina Corre; Gen Shinoda; Hao Zhu; Diana L Cousminer; Christine Crossman; Christian Bellissimo; Anna Goldenberg; George Q Daley; Mark R Palmert
Journal:  J Endocrinol       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 4.286

3.  Do Secular Trends in Skeletal Maturity Occur Equally in Both Sexes?

Authors:  Dana L Duren; Ramzi W Nahhas; Richard J Sherwood
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Relationship Between Age at Adult Height and Knee Mechanics During a Drop Vertical Jump in Men.

Authors:  Andrew M Steffensmeier; Sarah M Lamont; Garyn Metoyer; Zachary DiPaolo; Andrew W Froehle
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-08-18

5.  Childhood socioeconomic status and adult femoral neck bone strength: findings from the Midlife in the United States Study.

Authors:  Arun S Karlamangla; Takahiro Mori; Sharon S Merkin; Teresa E Seeman; Gail A Greendale; Neil Binkley; Carolyn J Crandall
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 6.  Factors influencing peak bone mass gain.

Authors:  Xiaowei Zhu; Houfeng Zheng
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 4.592

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.