Literature DB >> 22512986

International results with the Boston type I keratoprosthesis.

Anthony J Aldave1, Virender S Sangwan, Sayan Basu, Samar K Basak, Anna Hovakimyan, Ofelya Gevorgyan, Soliman Al Kharashi, Mohanna Al Jindan, Radhika Tandon, Jeena Mascarenhas, Boris Malyugin, Ma Dominga B Padilla, Quresh Maskati, Nisheeta Agarwala, Johan Hutauruk, Manoj Sharma, Fei Yu.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the indications and outcomes of Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis (Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, MA) surgery performed outside of North America and to compare them with those obtained in the United States by the surgeon who trained the international surgeons.
DESIGN: Retrospective review of consecutive clinical case series. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred ninety-four patients (223 keratoprosthesis procedures performed in 205 eyes) who received Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis at 11 ophthalmology centers in Armenia, India, Indonesia, Nepal, Philippines, Russia, and Saudi Arabia between May 1, 2006, and July 1, 2011 (international series), and at the Jules Stein Eye Institute between May 1, 2004, and July 1, 2011 (University of California, Los Angeles [UCLA] series).
METHODS: Data were collected for each procedure regarding the preoperative characteristics of each eye, the surgical procedure(s) performed, and the postoperative outcomes. Statistical analysis was performed to identify significant differences between the international and UCLA series in terms of retention and complications. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Interval visual acuities, keratoprosthesis retention, and significant postoperative complications.
RESULTS: In the international series, 113 Boston type I keratoprostheses were implanted in 107 eyes of 100 patients. The most common indication for surgery was corneal graft failure (n = 50; 44%) followed by chemical injury (n = 30; 27%). Although only 2% of eyes had a preoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) of 20/20 to 20/200, 70%, 68%, and 59% of eyes had a postoperative CDVA of 20/20 to 20/200 at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after surgery, respectively. Ninety-one of the 113 keratoprostheses implanted (80.5%) were retained at a mean follow-up of 14.2 months, for a retention failure rate of 22 per 134.6 eye-years (0.163/eye-year). The most common postoperative complications were retroprosthetic membrane formation (27%) and sterile corneal necrosis (18%). The only postoperative complication that was more common in the international series than in the UCLA series was infectious endophthalmitis, which developed in 9% of eyes.
CONCLUSIONS: Boston keratoprosthesis is a viable means of managing repeat graft failure and ocular chemical injury outside of North America, with similar visual acuity outcomes, retention rates, and incidence rates of postoperative complications to those obtained by North American surgeons.
Copyright © 2012 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22512986     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.02.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  35 in total

1.  Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis for failed keratoplasty.

Authors:  Jonathan L Hager; David L Phillips; Kenneth M Goins; Anna S Kitzmann; Mark A Greiner; Alex W Cohen; Jeffrey D Welder; Michael D Wagoner
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-05-16       Impact factor: 2.031

Review 2.  [Current treatment options with artificial corneas: Boston Kpro, Osteo-odontokeratoprosthesis, Miro Cornea® and KeraKlear®].

Authors:  N Schrage; K Hille; C Cursiefen
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 3.  Clinical correlates of common corneal neovascular diseases: a literature review.

Authors:  Nizar Saleh Abdelfattah; Mohamed Amgad; Amira A Zayed; Hamdy Salem; Ahmed E Elkhanany; Heba Hussein; Nawal Abd El-Baky
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 1.779

4.  Boston keratoprosthesis type 1: outcomes of the first 38 cases performed at Moorfields Eye Hospital.

Authors:  Chameen Samarawickrama; Nicholas Strouthidis; Mark R Wilkins
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 3.775

5.  Artificial corneas versus donor corneas for repeat corneal transplants.

Authors:  Masako Chen; Sueko M Ng; Esen K Akpek; Sumayya Ahmad
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-05-13

6.  Experimental study on the biocompatibility of keratoprosthesis with improved titanium implant.

Authors:  Li Li; Hua Jiang; Li-Qiang Wang; Yi-Fei Huang
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-11-18       Impact factor: 1.779

7.  Current Concepts in the Management of Unique Post-keratoplasty Infections.

Authors:  Julie M Schallhorn; Jennifer Rose-Nussbaumer
Journal:  Curr Ophthalmol Rep       Date:  2015-06-12

Review 8.  Glaucoma management after corneal transplantation surgeries.

Authors:  Helen L Kornmann; Steven J Gedde
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 3.761

9.  Boston keratoprosthesis for visual rehabilitation in porphyria cutanea tarda.

Authors:  Alok Sati; Virender S Sangwan; Sayan Basu; Parthasarathi Kalaiselvan
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2013-02-01

Review 10.  Current and Upcoming Therapies for Ocular Surface Chemical Injuries.

Authors:  Alireza Baradaran-Rafii; Medi Eslani; Zeeshan Haq; Ebrahim Shirzadeh; Michael J Huvard; Ali R Djalilian
Journal:  Ocul Surf       Date:  2016-09-17       Impact factor: 5.033

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.