BACKGROUND: Previous data suggest that the response of chronic myeloid leukemia cells to imatinib is dose-dependent. The potential benefit of initial dose intensification of imatinib in pre-treated patients with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia remains unknown. DESIGN AND METHODS: Two hundred and twenty-seven pre-treated patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase were randomly assigned to continuous treatment with a standard dose of imatinib (400 mg/day; n=113) or to 6 months of high-dose induction with imatinib (800 mg/day) followed by a standard dose of imatinib as maintenance therapy (n=114). RESULTS: The rates of major and complete cytogenetic responses were significantly higher in the high-dose arm than in the standard-dose arm at both 3 and 6 months (major cytogenetic responses: 36.8% versus 21.2%, P=0.01 and 50.0% versus 34.5%, P=0.018; complete cytogenetic responses: 22.8% versus 6.2%, P<0.001 and 40.4% versus 16.8%, P<0.001) on the basis of an intention-to-treat analysis. At 12 months, the difference between treatment arms remained statistically significant for complete cytogenetic responses (40.4% versus 24.8%, P=0.012) but not for major cytogenetic responses (49.1% versus 44.2%, P=0.462). The rate of major molecular responses was also significantly better at 3 and 6 months in the high-dose arm (month 3: 14.9% versus 3.5%, P=0.003; month 6: 32.5% versus 8.8%, P<0.001). Overall and progression-free survival rates were comparable between arms, but event-free survival was significantly worse in the high-dose arm (P=0.014). CONCLUSIONS: Standard-dose imatinib remains the standard of care for pre-treated patients with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00327262).
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Previous data suggest that the response of chronic myeloid leukemia cells to imatinib is dose-dependent. The potential benefit of initial dose intensification of imatinib in pre-treated patients with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia remains unknown. DESIGN AND METHODS: Two hundred and twenty-seven pre-treated patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase were randomly assigned to continuous treatment with a standard dose of imatinib (400 mg/day; n=113) or to 6 months of high-dose induction with imatinib (800 mg/day) followed by a standard dose of imatinib as maintenance therapy (n=114). RESULTS: The rates of major and complete cytogenetic responses were significantly higher in the high-dose arm than in the standard-dose arm at both 3 and 6 months (major cytogenetic responses: 36.8% versus 21.2%, P=0.01 and 50.0% versus 34.5%, P=0.018; complete cytogenetic responses: 22.8% versus 6.2%, P<0.001 and 40.4% versus 16.8%, P<0.001) on the basis of an intention-to-treat analysis. At 12 months, the difference between treatment arms remained statistically significant for complete cytogenetic responses (40.4% versus 24.8%, P=0.012) but not for major cytogenetic responses (49.1% versus 44.2%, P=0.462). The rate of major molecular responses was also significantly better at 3 and 6 months in the high-dose arm (month 3: 14.9% versus 3.5%, P=0.003; month 6: 32.5% versus 8.8%, P<0.001). Overall and progression-free survival rates were comparable between arms, but event-free survival was significantly worse in the high-dose arm (P=0.014). CONCLUSIONS: Standard-dose imatinib remains the standard of care for pre-treated patients with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00327262).
Authors: Deborah L White; Verity A Saunders; Phuong Dang; Jane Engler; Amity Venables; Stephanie Zrim; Andrew Zannettino; Kevin Lynch; Paul W Manley; Timothy Hughes Journal: Blood Date: 2007-08-30 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Jorge E Cortes; Michele Baccarani; François Guilhot; Brian J Druker; Susan Branford; Dong-Wook Kim; Fabrizio Pane; Ricardo Pasquini; Stuart L Goldberg; Matt Kalaycio; Beatriz Moiraghi; Jacob M Rowe; Elena Tothova; Carmino De Souza; Marc Rudoltz; Richard Yu; Tillmann Krahnke; Hagop M Kantarjian; Jerald P Radich; Timothy P Hughes Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-12-14 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: A Hochhaus; S G O'Brien; F Guilhot; B J Druker; S Branford; L Foroni; J M Goldman; M C Müller; J P Radich; M Rudoltz; M Mone; I Gathmann; T P Hughes; R A Larson Journal: Leukemia Date: 2009-03-12 Impact factor: 11.528
Authors: Timothy P Hughes; Susan Branford; Deborah L White; John Reynolds; Rachel Koelmeyer; John F Seymour; Kerry Taylor; Chris Arthur; Anthony Schwarer; James Morton; Julian Cooney; Michael F Leahy; Philip Rowlings; John Catalano; Mark Hertzberg; Robin Filshie; Anthony K Mills; Keith Fay; Simon Durrant; Henry Januszewicz; David Joske; Craig Underhill; Scott Dunkley; Kevin Lynch; Andrew Grigg Journal: Blood Date: 2008-09-03 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Hugues de Lavallade; Jane F Apperley; Jamshid S Khorashad; Dragana Milojkovic; Alistair G Reid; Marco Bua; Richard Szydlo; Eduardo Olavarria; Jaspal Kaeda; John M Goldman; David Marin Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-06-02 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jorge E Cortes; Hagop M Kantarjian; Stuart L Goldberg; Bayard L Powell; Francis J Giles; Meir Wetzler; Luke Akard; John M Burke; Robert Kerr; Mansoor Saleh; August Salvado; Karen McDougall; Maher Albitar; Jerald Radich Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-08-31 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Michele Baccarani; Jorge Cortes; Fabrizio Pane; Dietger Niederwieser; Giuseppe Saglio; Jane Apperley; Francisco Cervantes; Michael Deininger; Alois Gratwohl; François Guilhot; Andreas Hochhaus; Mary Horowitz; Timothy Hughes; Hagop Kantarjian; Richard Larson; Jerald Radich; Bengt Simonsson; Richard T Silver; John Goldman; Rudiger Hehlmann Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-11-02 Impact factor: 44.544