Literature DB >> 22508977

Sex ratios among Canadian liveborn infants of mothers from different countries.

Joel G Ray1, David A Henry, Marcelo L Urquia.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There has been much discussion about whether female feticide occurs in certain immigrant groups in Canada. We examined data on live births in Ontario and compared sex ratios in different groups according to the mother's country or region of birth and parity.
METHODS: We completed a population-based study of 766,688 singleton live births between 2002 and 2007. We used birth records provided by Ontario Vital Statistics for live births in the province between 23 and 41 weeks' gestation. We categorized each newborn according to the mother's country or region of birth, namely Canada (n = 486,599), Europe (n = 58,505), South Korea (n = 3663), China (n = 23,818), Philippines (n = 15,367), rest of East Asia (n = 18,971), Pakistan (n = 18,018), India (n = 31,978), rest of South Asia (n = 20,695) and other countries (n = 89,074). We calculated male:female ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for all live births by these regions and stratified them by maternal parity at the time of delivery (0, 1, 2 or ≥ 3).
RESULTS: Among infants of nulliparous women, the male:female ratio was about 1.05 overall. As parity increased, the ratio remained unchanged among infants of Canadian-born women. In contrast, the male:female ratio was significantly higher among infants of primiparous women born in South Korea (1.20, 95% CI 1.09-1.34) and India (1.11, 95% CI 1.07-1.15) than among infants of Canadian-born primiparous women. Among multiparous women, those born in India were significantly more likely than Canadian-born women to have a male infant (parity 2, ratio 1.36, 95% CI 1.27-1.46; parity ≥ 3, ratio 1.25, 95% CI 1.09-1.43).
INTERPRETATION: Our study of male:female ratios in Ontario showed that multiparous women born in India were significantly more likely than multiparous women born in Canada to have a male infant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22508977      PMCID: PMC3381774          DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.120165

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  8 in total

1.  Fetal sex determination: the predictive value of 3 common myths.

Authors:  S Ostler; A Sun
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-12-14       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Under-reporting of live births in Ontario: 1991-1997.

Authors:  Graham L Woodward; Monica K Bienefeld; Sten Ardal
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec

3.  "It's a girl!"--could be a death sentence.

Authors:  Rajendra Kale
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2012-01-16       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Sex selection migrates to Canada.

Authors:  Lauren Vogel
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2012-01-16       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 5.  Sonographic fetal sex determination.

Authors:  Marwan Odeh; Vatali Granin; Mohamed Kais; Ella Ophir; Jacob Bornstein
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Surv       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.347

6.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for elective sex selection, the IVF market economy, and the child--another long day's journey into night?

Authors:  E Scott Sills; Gianpiero D Palermo
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Trends in selective abortions of girls in India: analysis of nationally representative birth histories from 1990 to 2005 and census data from 1991 to 2011.

Authors:  Prabhat Jha; Maya A Kesler; Rajesh Kumar; Faujdar Ram; Usha Ram; Lukasz Aleksandrowicz; Diego G Bassani; Shailaja Chandra; Jayant K Banthia
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  A global review of laws on induced abortion, 1985-1997.

Authors:  A Rahman; L Katzive; S K Henshaw
Journal:  Int Fam Plann Persp       Date:  1998-06
  8 in total
  19 in total

1.  Variations in male-female infant ratios among births to Canadian- and Indian-born mothers, 1990-2011: a population-based register study.

Authors:  Marcelo L Urquia; Joel G Ray; Susitha Wanigaratne; Rahim Moineddin; Patricia J O'Campo
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2016-03-31

2.  Adaptive reasons for variation in sex ratios.

Authors:  João Alpedrinha; Geoff Wild
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Are sex-selective abortions a characteristic of every poor region? Evidence from Brazil.

Authors:  Alexandre Dias Porto Chiavegatto Filho; Ichiro Kawachi
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2012-10-20       Impact factor: 3.380

4.  Intergenerational abortion tendency between mothers and teenage daughters: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Ning Liu; M Michèle Farrugia; Simone N Vigod; Marcelo L Urquia; Joel G Ray
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Son Preference of Immigrants to the United States: Data from U.S. Birth Certificates, 2004-2013.

Authors:  Embry M Howell; Huanjun Zhang; Dudley L Poston
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2018-06

6.  Sex ratios at birth after induced abortion.

Authors:  Marcelo L Urquia; Rahim Moineddin; Prabhat Jha; Patricia J O'Campo; Kwame McKenzie; Richard H Glazier; David A Henry; Joel G Ray
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Changing trend? Sex ratios of children born to Indian immigrants in Norway revisited.

Authors:  Marianne Tønnessen; Vebjørn Aalandslid; Terje Skjerpen
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  Impact of prenatal technologies on the sex ratio in India: an overview.

Authors:  Kamlesh Madan; Martijn H Breuning
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  Sex ratios at birth in Australia according to mother's country of birth: A national study of all 5 614 847 reported live births 1997-2016.

Authors:  Kristina Edvardsson; Mary-Ann Davey; Rhonda Powell; Anna Axmon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Motor vehicle crashes during pregnancy and cerebral palsy during infancy: a longitudinal cohort analysis.

Authors:  Donald A Redelmeier; Faisal Naqib; Deva Thiruchelvam; Jon F R Barrett
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.