OBJECTIVE: To determine the sex and age distribution of aquaporin-4 (AQP4) autoimmunity using data derived from clinical service laboratory testing of 56,464 patient samples. DESIGN: Observational analysis. SETTING: Mayo Clinic Neuroimmunology Laboratory. PATIENTS: Between October 1, 2005, and January 4, 2011, 56,464 patients were tested for AQP4-IgG; 2960 (5.2%) patients were seropositive. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Seropositivity for AQP4-IgG. RESULTS: Patients seropositive for AQP4-IgG were older than seronegative patients (mean [SD] age, 46 [16] vs 42 [15] years, respectively; P < .001). More females than males were tested (37,662 vs 16,810, respectively; P < .001). Among 2743 seropositive patients, 146 (5.3%) were pediatric (aged ≤18 years) and 333 (12.1%) were elderly (aged ≥65 years). The sex distribution of seropositive patients was 2465 females and 306 males (absolute female:male ratio, 8.1:1; P < .001). After adjusting for the number of females tested, an excess of females persisted (adjusted female:male ratio, 3.6:1). Female predominance for AQP4-IgG was more striking in adults (absolute female:male ratio, 8.4:1; adjusted female:male ratio, 3.5:1) than in pediatric patients (absolute female:male ratio, 4.3:1; adjusted female:male ratio, 2.9:1) (P < .001). Elderly women were more likely to be seropositive than individuals in other age categories (13.1% vs 6.0%, respectively; P < .001). The proportion of AQP4-IgG-seropositive individuals (detection rate), defined by decade of age, increased exponentially in women after age 50 years. CONCLUSIONS: Seropositivity for AQP4-IgG occurs predominantly in females, particularly in individuals older than 18 years. Among seropositive patients, 1 in 6 is in the extremes of age. The detection rate of AQP4-IgG increased in women after age 50 years.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the sex and age distribution of aquaporin-4 (AQP4) autoimmunity using data derived from clinical service laboratory testing of 56,464 patient samples. DESIGN: Observational analysis. SETTING:Mayo Clinic Neuroimmunology Laboratory. PATIENTS: Between October 1, 2005, and January 4, 2011, 56,464 patients were tested for AQP4-IgG; 2960 (5.2%) patients were seropositive. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Seropositivity for AQP4-IgG. RESULTS:Patients seropositive for AQP4-IgG were older than seronegative patients (mean [SD] age, 46 [16] vs 42 [15] years, respectively; P < .001). More females than males were tested (37,662 vs 16,810, respectively; P < .001). Among 2743 seropositive patients, 146 (5.3%) were pediatric (aged ≤18 years) and 333 (12.1%) were elderly (aged ≥65 years). The sex distribution of seropositive patients was 2465 females and 306 males (absolute female:male ratio, 8.1:1; P < .001). After adjusting for the number of females tested, an excess of females persisted (adjusted female:male ratio, 3.6:1). Female predominance for AQP4-IgG was more striking in adults (absolute female:male ratio, 8.4:1; adjusted female:male ratio, 3.5:1) than in pediatric patients (absolute female:male ratio, 4.3:1; adjusted female:male ratio, 2.9:1) (P < .001). Elderly women were more likely to be seropositive than individuals in other age categories (13.1% vs 6.0%, respectively; P < .001). The proportion of AQP4-IgG-seropositive individuals (detection rate), defined by decade of age, increased exponentially in women after age 50 years. CONCLUSIONS: Seropositivity for AQP4-IgG occurs predominantly in females, particularly in individuals older than 18 years. Among seropositive patients, 1 in 6 is in the extremes of age. The detection rate of AQP4-IgG increased in women after age 50 years.
Authors: Vanda A Lennon; Dean M Wingerchuk; Thomas J Kryzer; Sean J Pittock; Claudia F Lucchinetti; Kazuo Fujihara; Ichiro Nakashima; Brian G Weinshenker Journal: Lancet Date: 2004 Dec 11-17 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: B Banwell; S Tenembaum; V A Lennon; E Ursell; J Kennedy; A Bar-Or; B G Weinshenker; C F Lucchinetti; S J Pittock Journal: Neurology Date: 2007-12-19 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Dean M Wingerchuk; Vanda A Lennon; Claudia F Lucchinetti; Sean J Pittock; Brian G Weinshenker Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Sara Salama; Hazem Marouf; M Ihab Reda; Amal R Mansour; Osama ELKholy; Michael Levy Journal: J Neuroimmunol Date: 2018-08-29 Impact factor: 3.478
Authors: Saif Huda; Dan Whittam; Maneesh Bhojak; Jayne Chamberlain; Carmel Noonan; Anu Jacob Journal: Clin Med (Lond) Date: 2019-03 Impact factor: 2.659
Authors: Yujuan Jiao; James P Fryer; Vanda A Lennon; Andrew McKeon; Sarah M Jenkins; Carin Y Smith; Amy M L Quek; Brian G Weinshenker; Dean M Wingerchuk; Elizabeth A Shuster; Claudia F Lucchinetti; Sean J Pittock Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 18.302
Authors: Matthew M Nour; Ichiro Nakashima; Ester Coutinho; Mark Woodhall; Filipa Sousa; Jon Revis; Yoshiki Takai; Jithin George; Joanna Kitley; Maria Ernestina Santos; Joseph M Nour; Fan Cheng; Hiroshi Kuroda; Tatsuro Misu; Ana Martins-da-Silva; Gabriele C DeLuca; Angela Vincent; Jacqueline Palace; Patrick Waters; Kazuo Fujihara; Maria Isabel Leite Journal: Neurology Date: 2015-11-18 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Amy Kunchok; John J Chen; Andrew McKeon; John R Mills; Eoin P Flanagan; Sean J Pittock Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2020-02-01 Impact factor: 29.907