Luke R Wilkins1, Hanping Wu, John R Haaga, Agata Exner. 1. Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA. luke.wilkins@uhhospitals.org
Abstract
PURPOSE: To investigate inherent differences in vasculature of tumors versus normal parenchyma and efficacy of radiofrequency (RF) ablation with glucagon, adenosine, and a combination of the two compared with normal saline solution (NS) controls in an N1-S1 tumor model implanted in Sprague-Dawley rat livers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 17 tumors were established in the left lobes of rats. Tumor perfusion relative to surrounding liver parenchyma was evaluated with contrast-enhanced ultrasound with intermittent-bolus technique before and after administration of glucagon, adenosine, a combination of the two, or NS. Tumors were ablated with a 22-gauge RF probe with 1 cm of exposed tip at 80 °C for 2 min. Tumor size, zone of necrosis, and viable tumor were measured in tumors after 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride staining. Results were compared with degree of tumor perfusion. RESULTS: The normalized tumor perfusion ratio did not significantly change with administration of NS (1.38% ± 3.93). Vasomodulation resulted in significant decreases in normalized tumor perfusion ratio: 66.22% ± 24.57 (P < .01) with glucagon, 71.45% ± 22.72 (P < .01) with adenosine, and 74.98% ± 16.58 (P < .01) with glucagon plus adenosine. After tumor ablation, there was an increase in size of the ablated area by 100%-165% in the three treatment groups compared with NS controls. Differences among treatment groups were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor blood flow may be significantly altered by using systemic injection of appropriate medications. This tumor- and organ-specific approach to tumor vasomodulation may be used to enhance current therapeutic options.
PURPOSE: To investigate inherent differences in vasculature of tumors versus normal parenchyma and efficacy of radiofrequency (RF) ablation with glucagon, adenosine, and a combination of the two compared with normal saline solution (NS) controls in an N1-S1 tumor model implanted in Sprague-Dawley rat livers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 17 tumors were established in the left lobes of rats. Tumor perfusion relative to surrounding liver parenchyma was evaluated with contrast-enhanced ultrasound with intermittent-bolus technique before and after administration of glucagon, adenosine, a combination of the two, or NS. Tumors were ablated with a 22-gauge RF probe with 1 cm of exposed tip at 80 °C for 2 min. Tumor size, zone of necrosis, and viable tumor were measured in tumors after 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride staining. Results were compared with degree of tumor perfusion. RESULTS: The normalized tumor perfusion ratio did not significantly change with administration of NS (1.38% ± 3.93). Vasomodulation resulted in significant decreases in normalized tumor perfusion ratio: 66.22% ± 24.57 (P < .01) with glucagon, 71.45% ± 22.72 (P < .01) with adenosine, and 74.98% ± 16.58 (P < .01) with glucagon plus adenosine. After tumor ablation, there was an increase in size of the ablated area by 100%-165% in the three treatment groups compared with NS controls. Differences among treatment groups were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS:Tumor blood flow may be significantly altered by using systemic injection of appropriate medications. This tumor- and organ-specific approach to tumor vasomodulation may be used to enhance current therapeutic options.
Authors: Bertrand Janne d'Othée; Constantinos T Sofocleous; Nader Hanna; Robert J Lewandowski; Michael C Soulen; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Steven J Cohen; Alan P Venook; Matthew S Johnson; Andrew S Kennedy; Ravi Murthy; Jean-Francois Geschwind; Stephen T Kee Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 2012-02 Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: M Hayashi; O Matsui; K Ueda; Y Kawamori; M Kadoya; J Yoshikawa; T Gabata; T Takashima; A Nonomura; Y Nakanuma Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 1999-04 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Justin P McWilliams; Shota Yamamoto; Steven S Raman; Christopher T Loh; Edward W Lee; David M Liu; Stephen T Kee Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: Shunichi Morikawa; Peter Baluk; Toshiyuki Kaidoh; Amy Haskell; Rakesh K Jain; Donald M McDonald Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: Martin Krix; Fabian Kiessling; Silvia Vosseler; Isabel Kiessling; Martin Le-Huu; Norbert E Fusenig; Stefan Delorme Journal: Ultrasound Med Biol Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 2.998
Authors: Antoine Hakimé; Andrew Hines-Peralta; Himaja Peddi; Michael B Atkins; Vikas P Sukhatme; Sabina Signoretti; Meredith Regan; S Nahum Goldberg Journal: Radiology Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Clare Horkan; Muneeb Ahmed; Zhengjun Liu; G Scott Gazelle; Stephanie A Solazzo; Jonathan B Kruskal; S Nahum Goldberg Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: Andrew C Gordon; Robert J Lewandowski; Riad Salem; Delbert E Day; Reed A Omary; Andrew C Larson Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 2013-12-06 Impact factor: 3.464