Literature DB >> 16720872

Improved tumor destruction with arsenic trioxide and radiofrequency ablation in three animal models.

Andrew Hines-Peralta1, Vikas Sukhatme, Meredith Regan, Sabina Signoretti, Zheng-jun Liu, S Nahum Goldberg.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the extent of tumor blood flow reduction that is achievable with arsenic trioxide (As2O3) and the effect of As2O3 on radiofrequency (RF)-induced coagulation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: All animal protocols and experiments were approved by an institutional animal care and use committee before the start of the study. Experiments were conducted in three tumor models: intrarenal VX2 sarcoma in 27 rabbits, RCC 786-0 human renal cell carcinoma in 24 nude mice, and R3230 mammary adenocarcinoma in 40 rats. One dose (0-7.5 mg per kilogram of body weight) of As2O3 was administered (intraperitoneally in rodents, intravenously in rabbits) 1, 6, or 24 hours before standardized RF ablation, which was performed by using a 1-cm active tip, with mean temperatures of 70 degrees C +/- 2 (standard deviation) for 5 minutes in rodents and 90 degrees C +/- 2 for 6 minutes in rabbits. Laser Doppler flowmetry was used to quantify changes in blood flow, which were compared with diameters of induced tumor coagulation. Comparisons between groups were performed by using Student t tests or analysis of variance. The strengths of correlations between As2O3, tumor blood flow, and RF-induced coagulation were assessed by using linear and higher-order regression models and reported as R2 computations.
RESULTS: Administration of As2O3 significantly (P < .05) reduced blood flow and increased tumor destruction in all tumor models. In VX2 sarcoma tumors, 1 mg/kg As2O3 reduced mean tumor blood flow to 46% +/- 13 of the normal value. The mean resultant coagulation (1.1 cm +/- 0.1) was significantly greater than that achieved with RF ablation alone (0.6 cm +/- 0.1, P < .01). In RCC 786-0 and R3230 tumors, 5 mg/kg As2O3 reduced mean tumor blood flow to 57% +/- 6 and 46% +/- 6 of normal, respectively, increasing mean ablation extent to 0.8 cm +/- 0.1 for both models, compared with those achieved with the control treatment (0.6 cm +/- 0.1 and 0.5 cm +/- 0.1, respectively; P < .05 for both comparisons). Dose studies revealed correlations between drug dose, tumor blood flow, and RF-induced coagulation in all three tumor models (R2 = 0.60-0.79). Maximal RF synergy was observed 1 hour after As2O3 administration.
CONCLUSION: As2O3 administration represents a transient noninvasive method of reducing tumor blood flow during RF ablation, enabling larger zones of tumor destruction in multiple tumor models. RSNA, 2006

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16720872     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2401050788

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  21 in total

Review 1.  Thermal ablation of tumours: biological mechanisms and advances in therapy.

Authors:  Katrina F Chu; Damian E Dupuy
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 60.716

2.  In vivo effects of radiofrequency ablation on long bones and the repair process in swine models.

Authors:  Wei Zhao; Jin-Zhou Chen; Ji-Hong Hu; Jian-Qiang Huang; Yong-Neng Jiang; Gang Luo; Gen-Fa Yi; Zhao-Hong Peng; Hui Wang; Jin Shen; Bu-Lang Gao
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 2.374

3.  Radiofrequency ablation: effect of tumor- and organ-specific pharmacologic modulation of arterial and portal venous blood flow on coagulation diameter in an N1-S1 tumor model.

Authors:  Luke R Wilkins; Hanping Wu; John R Haaga; Agata Exner
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2012-04-14       Impact factor: 3.464

Review 4.  Local ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma in taiwan.

Authors:  Shi-Ming Lin
Journal:  Liver Cancer       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 11.740

5.  Liposomal doxorubicin increases radiofrequency ablation-induced tumor destruction by increasing cellular oxidative and nitrative stress and accelerating apoptotic pathways.

Authors:  Stephanie A Solazzo; Muneeb Ahmed; Rachel Schor-Bardach; Wei Yang; Geoffrey D Girnun; Syed Rahmanuddin; Tatyana Levchenko; Sabina Signoretti; Douglas R Spitz; Vladimir Torchilin; S Nahum Goldberg
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Enhanced efficacy of radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma using a novel vascular disrupting agent, CKD-516.

Authors:  Su Jung Ham; YoonSeok Choi; Seul-I Lee; Jinil Kim; Young Il Kim; Jin Wook Chung; Kyung Won Kim
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 6.047

Review 7.  Radiofrequency and microwave ablation of the liver, lung, kidney, and bone: what are the differences?

Authors:  Christopher L Brace
Journal:  Curr Probl Diagn Radiol       Date:  2009 May-Jun

Review 8.  Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging appearance of renal neoplasms after radiofrequency ablation and cryoablation.

Authors:  Satomi Kawamoto; Stephen B Solomon; David A Bluemke; Elliot K Fishman
Journal:  Semin Ultrasound CT MR       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.875

9.  Vasomodulation of tumor blood flow: effect on perfusion and thermal ablation size.

Authors:  Hanping Wu; Agata A Exner; Tianyi M Krupka; Brent D Weinberg; John R Haaga
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 3.934

10.  Does arterial spin-labeling MR imaging-measured tumor perfusion correlate with renal cell cancer response to antiangiogenic therapy in a mouse model?

Authors:  Rachel Schor-Bardach; David C Alsop; Ivan Pedrosa; Stephanie A Solazzo; Xiaoen Wang; Robert P Marquis; Michael B Atkins; Meredith Regan; Sabina Signoretti; Robert E Lenkinski; S Nahum Goldberg
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 11.105

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.