Literature DB >> 22507535

The prognostic significance of age in surgically staged patients with Type II endometrial carcinoma.

Sean Vance1, Raphael Yechieli, Chad Cogan, Rabbie Hanna, Adnan Munkarah, Mohamed A Elshaikh.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Many studies have examined the impact of older age on tumor recurrence and survival after hysterectomy for patients with endometrioid carcinoma. However, there is paucity of data examining the prognostic significance of age in patients with Type II endometrial carcinoma. The study was conducted to determine the prognostic impact of age in this patient population.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved study, our prospectively-maintained database of 1305 patients with endometrial cancer was reviewed. Seventy-two consecutive patients with serous and clear carcinoma 2009 FIGO stages I-II were identified with at least one year follow-up after surgical staging. Patients with mixed histology and those who received preoperative therapy were excluded. All the patients underwent surgical staging from 1989 to 2009. Their medical records were reviewed. The study cohort was divided into two groups based on their age at hysterectomy (≤ 65 vs. >65). Patient's demographics, pathologic features and treatment-related factors were compared. The impact of age on recurrence-free survival (RFS), disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated. Following univariate analysis, multivariate modeling was done using step-wise Cox proportional hazards analysis to assess the impact of age on clinical outcomes after adjusting for various clinical variables.
RESULTS: Median follow-up for the study cohort was 45 months (range 13-246). Fifty percent of patients received adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy and/or adjuvant radiation treatment (RT). Thirty-five patients were older than 65 years (49%) and 37 were ≤ 65 (51%). There were no significant differences between the two groups in regard to race (African American vs Caucasian), FIGO stage, number of lymph nodes dissected, lymphovascular space involvement (LVSI), or adjuvant therapy received. There were more clear cell histology in the younger age group (p=0.035). Patients >65 years old developed more recurrences with a 5-year RFS of 59% compared to 84% for younger patients (p=0.036). The five-year DSS was not statistically different between the two groups (68% vs. 79%, respectively with p=0.313). 5-year OS was significantly shorter in the elderly patients (58% vs. 78% with p=0.014). On multivariate analysis, the presence of LVSI, not receiving RT and age >65 were independent predictors of worse RFS (p=<0.001, 0.005, and 0.040 respectively).
CONCLUSION: In this study for surgically staged FIGO I-II patients with Type II endometrial carcinoma, age more than 65 years is a significant adverse prognostic factor for tumor recurrence.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22507535     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.04.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  10 in total

1.  Impact of age at diagnosis on racial disparities in endometrial cancer patients.

Authors:  Christopher M Tarney; Chunqiao Tian; Guisong Wang; Elizabeth A Dubil; Nicholas W Bateman; John K Chan; Mohamed A Elshaikh; Michele L Cote; Joellen M Schildkraut; Craig D Shriver; Thomas P Conrads; Chad A Hamilton; G Larry Maxwell; Kathleen M Darcy
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Preoperative CT-based nomogram for predicting overall survival in women with non-endometrioid carcinomas of the uterine corpus.

Authors:  Yulia Lakhman; Derya Yakar; Debra A Goldman; Seth S Katz; Hebert A Vargas; Maura Miccò; Junting Zheng; Chaya S Moskowitz; Robert A Soslow; Hedvig Hricak; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Evis Sala
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2015-08

3.  Morphologic and other clinicopathologic features of endometrial clear cell carcinoma: a comprehensive analysis of 50 rigorously classified cases.

Authors:  Oluwole Fadare; Wenxin Zheng; Marta A Crispens; Howard W Iii Jones; Dineo Khabele; Katja Gwin; Sharon X Liang; Khaled Mohammed; Mohamed M Desouki; Vinita Parkash; Jonathan L Hecht
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 6.166

4.  Correlation of TNFAIP8 overexpression with the proliferation, metastasis, and disease-free survival in endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Tianbo Liu; Hongyu Gao; Meng Yang; Tingting Zhao; Yunduo Liu; Ge Lou
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-03-04

5.  Clinicopathological characteristics, treatment and outcomes in uterine carcinosarcoma and grade 3 endometrial cancer patients: a comparative study.

Authors:  Jun Zhu; Hao Wen; Rui Bi; Xiaohua Wu
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 4.401

6.  Prediction of Recurrence by Preoperative Intratumoral FDG Uptake Heterogeneity in Endometrioid Endometrial Cancer.

Authors:  Seo Young Kang; Gi Jeong Cheon; Maria Lee; Hee Seung Kim; Jae-Weon Kim; Noh-Hyun Park; Yong Sang Song; Hyun Hoon Chung
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 4.243

7.  Preponderance of endometrial carcinoma in elderly patients.

Authors:  Naoki Ogane; Shin-Ichi Hori; Mitsutake Yano; Tomomi Katoh; Shingo Kamoshida; Hisamori Kato; Yoichi Kameda; Masanori Yasuda
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-07-19

8.  Prognostic factors in clear cell carcinoma of endometrium: analysis of 55 cases.

Authors:  Vera Loizzi; Ettore Cicinelli; Achiropita Lepera; Francesco Legge; Massimiliano Memmola; Giulia Chiarello; Francesca Arezzo; Vittoria Del Vecchio; Leonardo Resta; Gennaro Cormio
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2022-01-19

9.  Predictive and prognostic factors in definition of risk groups in endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Bengt Sorbe
Journal:  ISRN Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-11-14

10.  Survival of women with clear cell and papillary serous endometrial cancer after adjuvant radiotherapy.

Authors:  Robert Foerster; Robert Kluck; Harald Rief; Stefan Rieken; Juergen Debus; Katja Lindel
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 3.481

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.