Literature DB >> 22506168

The test-retest reliability of supraspinatus cross-sectional area measurement by sonography.

Yang Soo Kim1, Nam Yeon Heo, Min Wook Kim.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the test-retest reliability of supraspinatus cross-sectional area measurement by ultrasonography.
METHOD: Both shoulders of 11 normal subjects (22 shoulders in total) were included in this study. The supraspinatus muscle was examined with the arm alongside the body in the coronal oblique and sagittal oblique planes. The occupational ratio of the supraspinatus fossa was measured. To calculate the occupational ratio, the Y view of MRI was reproduced with sonography by locating the suprascapular notch in the coronal oblique plane (in the plane of the scapula) and then rotating the transducer 90° to that plane. The cross-sectional area was measured using the tracing and ellipse tool. The second measurement was performed 7 days after the initial measurement.
RESULTS: The Pearson correlation coefficient and intraclass correlation coefficient between the first and the second occupational ratio measurements were 0.43 and 0.44, respectively, for the tracing method, and 0.53 and 0.47, respectively, for the ellipsoidal method. The difference between the first and second occupational ratio measurement was 4.1±3.9% (0.1-13.2%) for the tracing method, and 4.5±3.4% (0.01-10.5%) for the ellipsoidal method. The maximum difference was 13.2%. The occupational ratio was 86.2±5.3% (70.6-95.8%) for the tracing method and 85.0±5.2% (69.3-96.1%) for the ellipsoidal method.
CONCLUSION: Supraspinatus occupational ratio by sonography is a low to moderately reliable intrarater method. However, the maximum difference was not significant. The main reason for its low to moderate reliability was the narrow value range. Therefore, the study method should be re-evaluated in stroke patients and in patients with rotator cuff disease. Knowledge of the anatomy is a prerequisite to attain intrarater reliability.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Supraspinatus; Test-retest reliability; Ultrasonography

Year:  2011        PMID: 22506168      PMCID: PMC3309232          DOI: 10.5535/arm.2011.35.4.524

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Rehabil Med        ISSN: 2234-0645


  9 in total

1.  Comparison of muscle sizes and moment arms of two rotator cuff muscles measured by ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  B Juul-Kristensen; F Bojsen-Møller; E Holst; C Ekdahl
Journal:  Eur J Ultrasound       Date:  2000-06

2.  Measurement of human muscle volume using ultrasonography.

Authors:  Joseph I Esformes; Marco V Narici; Constantinos N Maganaris
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2002-03-27       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Practical assessment of rotator cuff muscle volumes using shoulder MRI.

Authors:  Janne T Lehtinen; Markus J Tingart; Maria Apreleva; David Zurakowski; William Palmer; Jon J P Warner
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2003-12

4.  Ultrasonographic assessment of human skeletal muscle size.

Authors:  Neil D Reeves; Constantinos N Maganaris; Marco V Narici
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2003-11-25       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Atrophy of the supraspinatus belly. Assessment by MRI in 55 patients with rotator cuff pathology.

Authors:  H Thomazeau; Y Rolland; C Lucas; J M Duval; F Langlais
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1996-06

6.  Prediction of rotator cuff repair results by magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  H Thomazeau; E Boukobza; N Morcet; J Chaperon; F Langlais
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 7.  Neuromuscular electrical stimulation in neurorehabilitation.

Authors:  Lynne R Sheffler; John Chae
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.217

8.  Atrophy and fatty infiltration of the supraspinatus muscle: sonography versus MRI.

Authors:  Viviane Khoury; Etienne Cardinal; Paul Brassard
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Should echocardiography be performed to assess effects of antihypertensive therapy? Test-retest reliability of echocardiography for measurement of left ventricular mass and function.

Authors:  J S Gottdiener; S V Livengood; P S Meyer; G A Chase
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 24.094

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Reliability of the supraspinatus muscle thickness measurement by ultrasonography.

Authors:  Tae Im Yi; In Soo Han; Joo Sup Kim; Ju Ryeon Jin; Jea Shin Han
Journal:  Ann Rehabil Med       Date:  2012-08-27

2.  Agreement in rotator cuff muscles measurement between ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Yasuyuki Ueda; Hiroshi Tanaka; Yoshiki Takeuchi; Takashi Tachibana; Hiroaki Inui; Katsuya Nobuhara; Jun Umehara; Noriaki Ichihashi
Journal:  Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol       Date:  2022-03-31
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.