BACKGROUND: Clinical recommendation of weight loss (WL) in older adults remains controversial, partially due to concerns regarding lean mass loss and potential loss of physical function. The purpose of this study is to determine the independent associations between changes in fat and lean mass and changes in physical function in older, overweight, and obese adults undergoing intentional WL. METHODS: Data from three randomized-controlled trials of intentional WL in older adults with similar functional outcomes (short physical performance battery and Pepper assessment tool for disability) were combined. Analyses of covariance models were used to investigate relationships between changes in weight, fat, and lean mass (acquired using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry) and changes in physical function. RESULTS:Overall loss of body weight was -7.8 ± 6.1 kg (-5.6 ± 4.1 kg and -2.7 ± 2.4 kg of fat and lean mass, respectively). In all studies combined, after adjustment for age, sex, and height, overall WL was associated with significant improvements in self-reported mobility disability (p < .01) and walking speed (p < .01). Models including change in both fat and lean mass as independent variables found only the change in fat mass to significantly predict change in mobility disability (β[fat] = 0.04; p < .01) and walking speed (β[fat] = -0.01; p < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Results from this study demonstrate that loss of body weight, following intentional WL, is associated with significant improvement in self-reported mobility disability and walking speed in overweight and obese older adults. Importantly, fat mass loss was found to be a more significant predictor of change in physical function than lean mass loss.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Clinical recommendation of weight loss (WL) in older adults remains controversial, partially due to concerns regarding lean mass loss and potential loss of physical function. The purpose of this study is to determine the independent associations between changes in fat and lean mass and changes in physical function in older, overweight, and obese adults undergoing intentional WL. METHODS: Data from three randomized-controlled trials of intentional WL in older adults with similar functional outcomes (short physical performance battery and Pepper assessment tool for disability) were combined. Analyses of covariance models were used to investigate relationships between changes in weight, fat, and lean mass (acquired using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry) and changes in physical function. RESULTS: Overall loss of body weight was -7.8 ± 6.1 kg (-5.6 ± 4.1 kg and -2.7 ± 2.4 kg of fat and lean mass, respectively). In all studies combined, after adjustment for age, sex, and height, overall WL was associated with significant improvements in self-reported mobility disability (p < .01) and walking speed (p < .01). Models including change in both fat and lean mass as independent variables found only the change in fat mass to significantly predict change in mobility disability (β[fat] = 0.04; p < .01) and walking speed (β[fat] = -0.01; p < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Results from this study demonstrate that loss of body weight, following intentional WL, is associated with significant improvement in self-reported mobility disability and walking speed in overweight and obese older adults. Importantly, fat mass loss was found to be a more significant predictor of change in physical function than lean mass loss.
Authors: M Kyla Shea; Barbara J Nicklas; Anthony P Marsh; Denise K Houston; Gary D Miller; Scott Isom; Michael E Miller; J Jeffrey Carr; Mary F Lyles; Tamara B Harris; Stephen B Kritchevsky Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2011-01-13 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Graziano Onder; Brenda W J H Penninx; Pablo Lapuerta; Linda P Fried; Glenn V Ostir; Jack M Guralnik; Marco Pahor Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Brenda W J H Penninx; Stephen B Kritchevsky; Anne B Newman; Barbara J Nicklas; Eleanor M Simonsick; Susan Rubin; Michael Nevitt; Marjolein Visser; Tamara Harris; Marco Pahor Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Arlene Schmid; Pamela W Duncan; Stephanie Studenski; Sue Min Lai; Lorie Richards; Subashan Perera; Samuel S Wu Journal: Stroke Date: 2007-05-17 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Jamy D Ard; Miranda Cook; Julia Rushing; Annette Frain; Kristen Beavers; Gary Miller; Michael E Miller; Barb Nicklas Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2016-07-19 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Fredric D Wolinsky; Padmaja Ayyagari; Theodore K Malmstrom; J Phillip Miller; Elena M Andresen; Mario Schootman; Douglas K Miller Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2013-12-13 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Graeme Carrick-Ranson; Jeffrey L Hastings; Paul S Bhella; Shigeki Shibata; Naoki Fujimoto; Dean Palmer; Kara Boyd; Benjamin D Levine Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2012-11-15 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Mark J Haykowsky; Erik J Kouba; Peter H Brubaker; Barbara J Nicklas; Joel Eggebeen; Dalane W Kitzman Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2014-01-15 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Rachel A Murphy; Ilse Reinders; Thomas C Register; Hilsa N Ayonayon; Anne B Newman; Suzanne Satterfield; Bret H Goodpaster; Eleanor M Simonsick; Stephen B Kritchevsky; Tamara B Harris Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2014-02-12 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Barbara J Nicklas; Elizabeth Chmelo; Osvaldo Delbono; J Jeffrey Carr; Mary F Lyles; Anthony P Marsh Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2015-03-11 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: M Kyla Shea; Richard F Loeser; Fang-Chi Hsu; Sarah L Booth; Michael Nevitt; Eleanor M Simonsick; Elsa S Strotmeyer; Cees Vermeer; Stephen B Kritchevsky Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2015-11-17 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Dalane W Kitzman; Peter Brubaker; Timothy Morgan; Mark Haykowsky; Gregory Hundley; William E Kraus; Joel Eggebeen; Barbara J Nicklas Journal: JAMA Date: 2016-01-05 Impact factor: 56.272