OBJECTIVE: We determined the utility of electrocorticography (ECoG) and stimulation for detecting language-related sites in patients with left-hemispheric language-dominance on Wada test. METHODS: We studied 13 epileptic patients who underwent language mapping using event-related gamma-oscillations on ECoG and stimulation via subdural electrodes. Sites showing significant gamma-augmentation during an auditory-naming task were defined as language-related ECoG sites. Sites at which stimulation resulted in auditory perceptual changes, failure to verbalize a correct answer, or sensorimotor symptoms involving the mouth were defined as language-related stimulation sites. We determined how frequently these methods revealed language-related sites in the superior-temporal, inferior-frontal, dorsolateral-premotor, and inferior-Rolandic regions. RESULTS: Language-related sites in the superior-temporal and inferior-frontal gyri were detected by ECoG more frequently than stimulation (p < 0.05), while those in the dorsolateral-premotor and inferior-Rolandic regions were detected by both methods equally. Stimulation of language-related ECoG sites, compared to the others, more frequently elicited language symptoms (p < 0.00001). One patient developed dysphasia requiring in-patient speech therapy following resection of the dorsolateral-premotor and inferior-Rolandic regions containing language-related ECoG sites not otherwise detected by stimulation. CONCLUSIONS: Language-related gamma-oscillations may serve as an alternative biomarker of underlying language function in patients with left-hemispheric language-dominance. SIGNIFICANCE: Measurement of language-related gamma-oscillations is warranted in presurgical evaluation of epileptic patients.
OBJECTIVE: We determined the utility of electrocorticography (ECoG) and stimulation for detecting language-related sites in patients with left-hemispheric language-dominance on Wada test. METHODS: We studied 13 epilepticpatients who underwent language mapping using event-related gamma-oscillations on ECoG and stimulation via subdural electrodes. Sites showing significant gamma-augmentation during an auditory-naming task were defined as language-related ECoG sites. Sites at which stimulation resulted in auditory perceptual changes, failure to verbalize a correct answer, or sensorimotor symptoms involving the mouth were defined as language-related stimulation sites. We determined how frequently these methods revealed language-related sites in the superior-temporal, inferior-frontal, dorsolateral-premotor, and inferior-Rolandic regions. RESULTS: Language-related sites in the superior-temporal and inferior-frontal gyri were detected by ECoG more frequently than stimulation (p < 0.05), while those in the dorsolateral-premotor and inferior-Rolandic regions were detected by both methods equally. Stimulation of language-related ECoG sites, compared to the others, more frequently elicited language symptoms (p < 0.00001). One patient developed dysphasia requiring in-patient speech therapy following resection of the dorsolateral-premotor and inferior-Rolandic regions containing language-related ECoG sites not otherwise detected by stimulation. CONCLUSIONS: Language-related gamma-oscillations may serve as an alternative biomarker of underlying language function in patients with left-hemispheric language-dominance. SIGNIFICANCE: Measurement of language-related gamma-oscillations is warranted in presurgical evaluation of epilepticpatients.
Authors: William D Gaillard; Bonnie C Sachs; Joseph R Whitnah; Zaaira Ahmad; Lyn M Balsamo; Jeffrey R Petrella; Suzanne H Braniecki; Christopher M McKinney; Kevin Hunter; Ben Xu; Cecile B Grandin Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2003-03 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Jerzy P Szaflarski; Vincent J Schmithorst; Mekibib Altaye; Anna W Byars; Jennifer Ret; Elena Plante; Scott K Holland Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Alon Sinai; Christopher W Bowers; Ciprian M Crainiceanu; Dana Boatman; Barry Gordon; Ronald P Lesser; Frederick A Lenz; Nathan E Crone Journal: Brain Date: 2005-04-07 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Erik C Brown; Otto Muzik; Robert Rothermel; Csaba Juhász; Aashit K Shah; Darren Fuerst; Sandeep Mittal; Sandeep Sood; Eishi Asano Journal: Clin Neurophysiol Date: 2013-12-01 Impact factor: 3.708