Literature DB >> 22503316

A critical analysis of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for differentiated thyroid carcinoma in young patients on the basis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry.

Hop S Tran Cao1, Lily E Johnston, David C Chang, Michael Bouvet.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Differentiated thyroid carcinomas (DTC) are the only tumors for which age is a determinant of stage in the American Joint Committee on Cancer's (AJCC) staging protocol. In this study, we re-examined the relationship between age, extent of disease, and prognosis by using a large dataset with longer follow-up times.
METHODS: We examined the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry data 1973 to 2005 for patients with DTC as their only known malignancy. We used Cox multivariate analyses to generate mortality hazard ratios, controlling for several variables, to evaluate the effects of age and disease extent.
RESULTS: We identified 55,402 patients with DTC. Of these, 49,240 had sufficient data to generate a TNM stage on the basis of AJCC guidelines. Within stage II, younger patients (<45 years) have worse outcomes than older patients (P < .001). Younger patients had an 11-fold increase in mortality between stages I and II, whereas there was no difference for older patients. When we uniformly applied the 45-and-older staging protocol to all patients, we found that stages III-IVc had a significantly greater risk of mortality for all patients compared with stage I.
CONCLUSION: The presence of regional and metastatic thyroid cancer bears prognostic significance for all ages. Under current AJCC guidelines, young patients with metastatic thyroid cancer may be understaged.
Copyright © 2012 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22503316      PMCID: PMC4416476          DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2012.02.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  12 in total

Review 1.  Staging systems for follicular thyroid carcinoma: application to 171 consecutive patients treated in a tertiary referral centre.

Authors:  Brian Hung-Hin Lang; Chung-Yau Lo; Wai-Fan Chan; King-Yin Lam; Koon-Yat Wan
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.678

2.  Clinically significant prognostic factors for differentiated thyroid carcinoma: a population-based, nested case-control study.

Authors:  Catharina Ihre Lundgren; Per Hall; Paul W Dickman; Jan Zedenius
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  A prognostic index for thyroid carcinoma. A study of the E.O.R.T.C. Thyroid Cancer Cooperative Group.

Authors:  D P Byar; S B Green; P Dor; E D Williams; J Colon; H A van Gilse; M Mayer; R J Sylvester; M van Glabbeke
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 9.162

4.  An expanded view of risk-group definition in differentiated thyroid carcinoma.

Authors:  B Cady; R Rossi
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  Prognostic factors for thyroid carcinoma. A population-based study of 15,698 cases from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) program 1973-1991.

Authors:  F D Gilliland; W C Hunt; D M Morris; C R Key
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1997-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Prognostic value of the sixth edition AJCC/UICC TNM classification for differentiated thyroid carcinoma with extrathyroid extension.

Authors:  Nobuyuki Wada; Hirotaka Nakayama; Nobuyasu Suganuma; Yoshihiko Masudo; Yasushi Rino; Munetaka Masuda; Toshio Imada
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2006-10-31       Impact factor: 5.958

7.  Ipsilateral lobectomy versus bilateral lobar resection in papillary thyroid carcinoma: a retrospective analysis of surgical outcome using a novel prognostic scoring system.

Authors:  I D Hay; C S Grant; W F Taylor; W M McConahey
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 3.982

8.  Do the level of nodal disease according to the TNM classification and the number of involved cervical nodes reflect prognosis in patients with differentiated carcinoma of the thyroid gland?

Authors:  N Sato; M Oyamatsu; Y Koyama; I Emura; Y Tamiya; K Hatakeyama
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.454

9.  Long-term impact of initial surgical and medical therapy on papillary and follicular thyroid cancer.

Authors:  E L Mazzaferri; S M Jhiang
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 4.965

10.  Further evidence of the validity of risk group definition in differentiated thyroid carcinoma.

Authors:  B Cady; R Rossi; M Silverman; M Wool
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 3.982

View more
  27 in total

1.  Analysis of age and disease status as predictors of thyroid cancer-specific mortality using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database.

Authors:  Ryan K Orosco; Timon Hussain; Kevin T Brumund; Deborah K Oh; David C Chang; Michael Bouvet
Journal:  Thyroid       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 6.568

2.  P53 protein profile by IHC may be helpful to define patient prognosis.

Authors:  Marjory Alana Marcello; Elaine Cristina Morari; Laura Sterian Ward
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 3.064

3.  Validation of the QTNM staging system for cancer-specific survival in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer.

Authors:  Daniel Mankarios; Peter Baade; Pip Youl; Robin H Mortimer; Adedayo A Onitilo; Anthony Russell; Suhail A R Doi
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 3.633

4.  Survival from Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: What Has Age Got to Do with It?

Authors:  Ian Ganly; Iain J Nixon; Laura Y Wang; Frank L Palmer; Jocelyn C Migliacci; Ahmad Aniss; Mark Sywak; Antoine E Eskander; Jeremy L Freeman; Michael J Campbell; Wen T Shen; Fernanda Vaisman; Denise Momesso; Rossana Corbo; Mario Vaisman; Ashok Shaha; R Michael Tuttle; Jatin P Shah; Snehal G Patel
Journal:  Thyroid       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 6.568

Review 5.  Crucial parameters in thyroid carcinoma reporting - challenges, controversies and clinical implications.

Authors:  Bin Xu; Ronald A Ghossein
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 5.087

Review 6.  Radioiodine-remnant ablation in low-risk differentiated thyroid cancer: pros.

Authors:  Kenneth B Ain
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 7.  Differentiated and anaplastic thyroid carcinoma: Major changes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition cancer staging manual.

Authors:  Nancy D Perrier; James D Brierley; R Michael Tuttle
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 508.702

8.  Expression of YY1 in Differentiated Thyroid Cancer.

Authors:  Jéssica Arribas; Josep Castellví; Ricard Marcos; Carles Zafón; Antonia Velázquez
Journal:  Endocr Pathol       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 3.943

9.  Age-based disparities in the use of total thyroidectomy for papillary thyroid carcinoma.

Authors:  I V Shevchyk; B A Cobian; S R Martinez
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 3.405

10.  Using the American Thyroid Association Risk-Stratification System to Refine and Individualize the American Joint Committee on Cancer Eighth Edition Disease-Specific Survival Estimates in Differentiated Thyroid Cancer.

Authors:  Sana A Ghaznavi; Ian Ganly; Ashok R Shaha; Crystal English; Jonathan Wills; R Michael Tuttle
Journal:  Thyroid       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 6.568

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.