Literature DB >> 24174176

Validation of the QTNM staging system for cancer-specific survival in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer.

Daniel Mankarios1, Peter Baade, Pip Youl, Robin H Mortimer, Adedayo A Onitilo, Anthony Russell, Suhail A R Doi.   

Abstract

An Australian state database was used to test the validity of the Quantitative tumor/node/metastasis (QTNM) staging system for assessing prognosis of differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) on the basis of four variables quantified at diagnosis (histopathology, age, node involvement, and tumor size). Using the Queensland Cancer Registry (QCR), we identified 788 cases of DTC diagnosed from 1982 to 2006 with complete staging information. Causes of death were ascertained by linking the QCR database with the Australian National Death Index. Subjects were staged according to AJCC TNM 7th edition and QTNM, and cancer-specific survival (CSS) was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Cancer-specific mortality was observed in 22 (2.8 %) patients, with 10-year CSS for the cohort of 97.0 % at a median follow-up of 262.8 months. QTNM stage specific cancer survival at 10 years was 99.6, 97.0, and 78.6 % for low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups, respectively. This was comparable to the original US dataset in which the QTNM was initially studied, and it fared better at discriminating survival than the standard TNM system, where there was overlap in survival between stages. The current study validates the QTNM system in an Australian cohort and shows at least equivalent discriminatory capacity to the current TNM staging system. The QTNM utilized prognostic variables of significance to produce an optimal three-stage stratification scheme. Given, its advantage in clearly discriminating between prognostic groups, clinical relevance and simplicity of use, we recommend that TNM be replaced with QTNM for risk stratification for both recurrence and CSS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24174176     DOI: 10.1007/s12020-013-0078-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endocrine        ISSN: 1355-008X            Impact factor:   3.633


  58 in total

1.  Outcome prediction and the future of the TNM staging system.

Authors:  Harry B Burke
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2004-10-06       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Differentiated thyroid carcinoma with distant metastases at presentation: prognostic factors and outcome.

Authors:  M Haq; C Harmer
Journal:  Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.478

3.  Clinically significant prognostic factors for differentiated thyroid carcinoma: a population-based, nested case-control study.

Authors:  Catharina Ihre Lundgren; Per Hall; Paul W Dickman; Jan Zedenius
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 4.  Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors.

Authors:  F E Harrell; K L Lee; D B Mark
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1996-02-28       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 5.  A comparison of different staging systems predictability of patient outcome. Thyroid carcinoma as an example.

Authors:  J D Brierley; T Panzarella; R W Tsang; M K Gospodarowicz; B O'Sullivan
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1997-06-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Restaging of differentiated thyroid carcinoma by the sixth edition AJCC/UICC TNM staging system: stage migration and predictability.

Authors:  Brian Lang; Chung-Yau Lo; Wai-Fan Chan; King-Yin Lam; Koon-Yat Wan
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-02-21       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Simplifying the TNM system for clinical use in differentiated thyroid cancer.

Authors:  Adedayo A Onitilo; Jessica M Engel; Catharina Ihre Lundgren; Per Hall; Lukman Thalib; Suhail A R Doi
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-03-09       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Long-term impact of initial surgical and medical therapy on papillary and follicular thyroid cancer.

Authors:  E L Mazzaferri; S M Jhiang
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 4.965

9.  Staging systems for papillary thyroid carcinoma: a study of 2 tertiary referral centers.

Authors:  Brian Hung-Hin Lang; Sin-Ming Chow; Chung-Yau Lo; Stephen C K Law; King-Yin Lam
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Prognostic factors in differentiated thyroid cancer--a 20-year surgical outcome study.

Authors:  Aleksander Konturek; Marcin Barczyński; Wojciech Nowak; Piotr Richter
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 3.445

View more
  7 in total

1.  Is there a need for yet another staging system for differentiated thyroid cancer?

Authors:  Michael Bouvet
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2014-02-16       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 2.  2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Adult Patients with Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: The American Thyroid Association Guidelines Task Force on Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer.

Authors:  Bryan R Haugen; Erik K Alexander; Keith C Bible; Gerard M Doherty; Susan J Mandel; Yuri E Nikiforov; Furio Pacini; Gregory W Randolph; Anna M Sawka; Martin Schlumberger; Kathryn G Schuff; Steven I Sherman; Julie Ann Sosa; David L Steward; R Michael Tuttle; Leonard Wartofsky
Journal:  Thyroid       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 6.568

3.  BRAF V600E Confers Male Sex Disease-Specific Mortality Risk in Patients With Papillary Thyroid Cancer.

Authors:  Fei Wang; Shihua Zhao; Xiaopei Shen; Guangwu Zhu; Rengyun Liu; David Viola; Rossella Elisei; Efisio Puxeddu; Laura Fugazzola; Carla Colombo; Barbara Jarzab; Agnieszka Czarniecka; Alfred K Lam; Caterina Mian; Federica Vianello; Linwah Yip; Garcilaso Riesco-Eizaguirre; Pilar Santisteban; Christine J O'Neill; Mark S Sywak; Roderick Clifton-Bligh; Bela Bendlova; Vlasta Sýkorová; Yangang Wang; Mingzhao Xing
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Association between TNM staging system and histopathological features in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma.

Authors:  Hye Jin Baek; Dong Wook Kim; Ji Hwa Ryu
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 3.633

5.  Optimal Cut-Off Values of Lymph Node Ratio Predicting Recurrence in Papillary Thyroid Cancer.

Authors:  Seul Gi Lee; Joon Ho; Jung Bum Choi; Tae Hyung Kim; Min Jhi Kim; Eun Jeong Ban; Cho Rok Lee; Sang-Wook Kang; Jong Ju Jeong; Kee-Hyun Nam; Sang Geun Jung; Young Suk Jo; Jandee Lee; Woong Youn Chung
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.889

6.  BRAF V600E Status Sharply Differentiates Lymph Node Metastasis-associated Mortality Risk in Papillary Thyroid Cancer.

Authors:  Yubing Tao; Fei Wang; Xiaopei Shen; Guangwu Zhu; Rengyun Liu; David Viola; Rossella Elisei; Efisio Puxeddu; Laura Fugazzola; Carla Colombo; Barbara Jarzab; Agnieszka Czarniecka; Alfred K Lam; Caterina Mian; Federica Vianello; Linwah Yip; Garcilaso Riesco-Eizaguirre; Pilar Santisteban; Christine J O'Neill; Mark S Sywak; Roderick Clifton-Bligh; Bela Bendlova; Vlasta Sýkorová; Shihua Zhao; Yangang Wang; Mingzhao Xing
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 6.134

7.  Is a simplified TNM staging system more clinically relevant than the American Joint Committee on Cancer system for the follicular variant of papillary thyroid cancer?

Authors:  Di Hu; Yueye Huang; Wen Zeng; Sichao Chen; Yihui Huang; Man Li; Wei Long; Jianglong Huang; Wei Wei; Chao Zhang; Zeming Liu; Liang Guo
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-04
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.