Literature DB >> 22503275

Validation of array comparative genome hybridization for diagnosis of translocations in preimplantation human embryos.

Pere Colls1, Tomas Escudero, Jill Fischer, Natalie A Cekleniak, Snunit Ben-Ozer, Bill Meyer, Miguel Damien, Jamie A Grifo, Avner Hershlag, Santiago Munné.   

Abstract

Fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH) for preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) of structural chromosome abnormalities has limitations, including carrier testing, inconclusive results and limited aneuploidy screening. Array comparative genome hybridization (CGH) was used in PGD cases for translocations. Unbalances could be identified if three fragments were detectable. Smallest detectable fragments were ∼6 Mbp and ∼5 Mbp for blastomeres and trophectoderm, respectively. Cases in which three or more fragments were detectable by array CGH underwent PGD by FISH and concordance was obtained in 53/54 (98.1%). The error rate for array CGH was 1.9% (1/54). Of 402 embryos analysed, 81 were normal or balanced, 92 unbalanced but euploid, 123 unbalanced and aneuploid and 106 balanced but aneuploid. FISH with additional probes to detect other aneuploidies would have missed 28 abnormal embryos in the reciprocal group and 10 in the Robertsonian group. PGD cases (926) were retrospectively reviewed for reciprocal translocations performed by FISH to identify which could have been analysed by array CGH. This study validates array CGH in PGD for translocations and shows that it can identify all embryos with unbalanced reciprocal and Robertsonian translocations. Array CGH is a better approach than FISH since it allows simultaneous screening of all chromosomes for aneuploidy.
Copyright © 2012 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22503275     DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.02.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online        ISSN: 1472-6483            Impact factor:   3.828


  21 in total

1.  The human sex ratio from conception to birth.

Authors:  Steven Hecht Orzack; J William Stubblefield; Viatcheslav R Akmaev; Pere Colls; Santiago Munné; Thomas Scholl; David Steinsaltz; James E Zuckerman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Preimplantation genetic testing using Karyomapping for a paternally inherited reciprocal translocation: a case study.

Authors:  C E Beyer; A Lewis; E Willats; J Mullen
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  False positive rate of an arrayCGH platform for single-cell preimplantation genetic screening and subsequent clinical application on day-3.

Authors:  Pere Mir; Lorena Rodrigo; Amparo Mercader; Pilar Buendía; Emilia Mateu; Miguel Milán-Sánchez; Vanessa Peinado; Antonio Pellicer; Jose Remohí; Carlos Simón; Carmen Rubio
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  The frequency of precocious segregation of sister chromatids in mouse female meiosis I is affected by genetic background.

Authors:  Anna Danylevska; Kristina Kovacovicova; Thuraya Awadova; Martin Anger
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 5.239

5.  Natural selection between day 3 and day 5/6 PGD embryos in couples with reciprocal or Robertsonian translocations.

Authors:  Claire E Beyer; E Willats
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-07-29       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Two different microarray technologies for preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening, due to reciprocal translocation imbalances, demonstrate equivalent euploidy and clinical pregnancy rates.

Authors:  Kyle J Tobler; Paul R Brezina; Andrew T Benner; Luke Du; Xin Xu; William G Kearns
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Assessing morphokinetic parameters via time lapse microscopy (TLM) to predict euploidy: are aneuploidy risk classification models universal?

Authors:  Yael G Kramer; Jason D Kofinas; Katherine Melzer; Nicole Noyes; Caroline McCaffrey; Julia Buldo-Licciardi; David H McCulloh; James A Grifo
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Polymorphisms in the MTHFR gene influence embryo viability and the incidence of aneuploidy.

Authors:  María Enciso; Jonás Sarasa; Leoni Xanthopoulou; Sara Bristow; Megan Bowles; Elpida Fragouli; Joy Delhanty; Dagan Wells
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 4.132

9.  Is it the egg or the endometrium? Elevated progesterone on day of trigger is not associated with embryo ploidy nor decreased success rates in subsequent embryo transfer cycles.

Authors:  Jason D Kofinas; Holly Mehr; Nandita Ganguly; Yelena Biley; Svetlana Bochkovsky; David McCulloh; Jamie Grifo
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-06-04       Impact factor: 3.412

10.  Serum progesterone levels greater than 20 ng/dl on day of embryo transfer are associated with lower live birth and higher pregnancy loss rates.

Authors:  Jason D Kofinas; Jennifer Blakemore; David H McCulloh; Jamie Grifo
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 3.412

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.