BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Differential responses of closely related species to submergence can provide insight into the evolution and mechanisms of submergence tolerance. Several traits of two wetland species from habitats with contrasting flooding regimes, Rorippa amphibia and Rorippa sylvestris, as well as F(1) hybrid Rorippa × anceps were analysed to unravel mechanisms underlying submergence tolerance. METHODS: In the first submergence experiment (lasting 20 d) we analysed biomass, stem elongation and carbohydrate content. In the second submergence experiment (lasting 3 months) we analysed survival and the effect of re-establishment of air contact on biomass and carbohydrate content. In a separate experiment we analysed expression of two carbohydrate catabolism genes, ADH1 and SUS1, upon re-establishment of air contact following submergence. KEY RESULTS: All plants had low mortality even after 3 months of submergence. Rorippa sylvestris was characterized by 100 % survival and higher carbohydrate levels coupled with lower ADH1 gene expression as well as reduced growth compared with R. amphibia. Rorippa amphibia and the hybrid elongated their stems but this did not pay-off in higher survival when plants remained submerged. Only R. amphibia and the hybrid benefited in terms of increased biomass and carbohydrate accumulation upon re-establishing air contact. CONCLUSIONS: Results demonstrate contrasting 'escape' and 'quiescence' strategies between Rorippa species. Being a close relative of arabidopsis, Rorippa is an excellent model for future studies on the molecular mechanism(s) controlling these strategies.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Differential responses of closely related species to submergence can provide insight into the evolution and mechanisms of submergence tolerance. Several traits of two wetland species from habitats with contrasting flooding regimes, Rorippa amphibia and Rorippa sylvestris, as well as F(1) hybrid Rorippa × anceps were analysed to unravel mechanisms underlying submergence tolerance. METHODS: In the first submergence experiment (lasting 20 d) we analysed biomass, stem elongation and carbohydrate content. In the second submergence experiment (lasting 3 months) we analysed survival and the effect of re-establishment of air contact on biomass and carbohydrate content. In a separate experiment we analysed expression of two carbohydrate catabolism genes, ADH1 and SUS1, upon re-establishment of air contact following submergence. KEY RESULTS: All plants had low mortality even after 3 months of submergence. Rorippa sylvestris was characterized by 100 % survival and higher carbohydrate levels coupled with lower ADH1 gene expression as well as reduced growth compared with R. amphibia. Rorippa amphibia and the hybrid elongated their stems but this did not pay-off in higher survival when plants remained submerged. Only R. amphibia and the hybrid benefited in terms of increased biomass and carbohydrate accumulation upon re-establishing air contact. CONCLUSIONS: Results demonstrate contrasting 'escape' and 'quiescence' strategies between Rorippa species. Being a close relative of arabidopsis, Rorippa is an excellent model for future studies on the molecular mechanism(s) controlling these strategies.
Authors: Xin Chen; Heidrun Huber; Hans de Kroon; Anton J M Peeters; Hendrik Poorter; Laurentius A C J Voesenek; Eric J W Visser Journal: Ann Bot Date: 2009-08-16 Impact factor: 4.357
Authors: Robert A M Vreeburg; Joris J Benschop; Anton J M Peeters; Timothy D Colmer; Ankie H M Ammerlaan; Marten Staal; Theo M Elzenga; Raymond H J Staals; Catherine P Darley; Simon J McQueen-Mason; Laurentius A C J Voesenek Journal: Plant J Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 6.417
Authors: Rashmi Sasidharan; Angelika Mustroph; Alex Boonman; Melis Akman; Ankie M H Ammerlaan; Timo Breit; M Eric Schranz; Laurentius A C J Voesenek; Peter H van Tienderen Journal: Plant Physiol Date: 2013-09-27 Impact factor: 8.340
Authors: Hans van Veen; Angelika Mustroph; Gregory A Barding; Marleen Vergeer-van Eijk; Rob A M Welschen-Evertman; Ole Pedersen; Eric J W Visser; Cynthia K Larive; Ronald Pierik; Julia Bailey-Serres; Laurentius A C J Voesenek; Rashmi Sasidharan Journal: Plant Cell Date: 2013-11-27 Impact factor: 11.277