INTRODUCTION: Tobacco use is a leading cause of cancer, and continued use after cancer diagnosis puts patients at greater risk for adverse health outcomes, including increased risk for cancer recurrence. This study surveyed National Cancer Institute (NCI)-designated Cancer Centers to assess the availability of tobacco use treatment (TUT) services. METHODS: Directors and oncology providers of 58 NCI-designated Cancer Centers received invitations to participate in an online survey. The questionnaire asked about attitudes, awareness, policies, and practices related to TUT; barriers to treatment provision; and factors likely to increase services. RESULTS: All 58 Cancer Centers participated. Twelve (20.7%) Centers reported no TUT services for their patients. Of the remainder, 34 (58.6%) reported a TUT program within their Center and 12 (20.7%) reported external TUT services in their health care system or affiliated university. Only 62% of Centers reported routinely providing tobacco education materials to patients, just over half reported effective identification of patient tobacco use, and less than half reported an employee dedicated to providing TUT services or a clear commitment to providing TUT services from Center leadership. The 34 centers with internal TUT programs reported significantly greater services and administration support for TUT Services. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate a national need for Cancer Centers to embrace and incorporate recommended standards for TUT. Tying TUT services to NCI recognition and providing stable funding for TUT services in Cancer Centers could lead to better health outcomes, treatment efficacy, and satisfaction for all U.S. Cancer Centers and their patients.
INTRODUCTION:Tobacco use is a leading cause of cancer, and continued use after cancer diagnosis puts patients at greater risk for adverse health outcomes, including increased risk for cancer recurrence. This study surveyed National Cancer Institute (NCI)-designated Cancer Centers to assess the availability of tobacco use treatment (TUT) services. METHODS: Directors and oncology providers of 58 NCI-designated Cancer Centers received invitations to participate in an online survey. The questionnaire asked about attitudes, awareness, policies, and practices related to TUT; barriers to treatment provision; and factors likely to increase services. RESULTS: All 58 Cancer Centers participated. Twelve (20.7%) Centers reported no TUT services for their patients. Of the remainder, 34 (58.6%) reported a TUT program within their Center and 12 (20.7%) reported external TUT services in their health care system or affiliated university. Only 62% of Centers reported routinely providing tobacco education materials to patients, just over half reported effective identification of patienttobacco use, and less than half reported an employee dedicated to providing TUT services or a clear commitment to providing TUT services from Center leadership. The 34 centers with internal TUT programs reported significantly greater services and administration support for TUT Services. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate a national need for Cancer Centers to embrace and incorporate recommended standards for TUT. Tying TUT services to NCI recognition and providing stable funding for TUT services in Cancer Centers could lead to better health outcomes, treatment efficacy, and satisfaction for all U.S. Cancer Centers and their patients.
Authors: Robert A Schnoll; Calvin James; Michael Malstrom; Randi L Rothman; Hao Wang; James Babb; Suzanne M Miller; John A Ridge; Benjamin Movsas; Corey Langer; Michael Unger; Melvyn Goldberg Journal: Ann Behav Med Date: 2003
Authors: Robert D Reid; Kerri-Anne Mullen; Monika E Slovinec D'Angelo; Debbie A Aitken; Sophia Papadakis; Patricia M Haley; Christine A McLaughlin; Andrew L Pipe Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2009-11-10 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Yolanda I Garces; Ping Yang; Julia Parkinson; Xinghua Zhao; Jason A Wampfler; Jon O Ebbert; Jeff A Sloan Journal: Chest Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Kim-Anh Do; Marcella M Johnson; J Jack Lee; Xi Feng Wu; Qiong Dong; Waun K Hong; Fadlo R Khuri; Margaret R Spitz Journal: Cancer Date: 2004-12-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Lisa Sanderson Cox; Christi A Patten; Jon O Ebbert; Amanda A Drews; Gary A Croghan; Matthew M Clark; Troy D Wolter; Paul A Decker; Richard D Hurt Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2002-08-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Anna McCullough; Michael Fisher; Adam O Goldstein; Kathryn D Kramer; Carol Ripley-Moffitt Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2009 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 2.657
Authors: M Shayne Gallaway; Bin Huang; Quan Chen; Thomas C Tucker; Jaclyn K McDowell; Eric Durbin; Sherri L Stewart; Eric Tai Journal: J Community Health Date: 2019-06
Authors: Brian P Jenssen; Frank Leone; Sarah Evers-Casey; Rinad Beidas; Robert Schnoll Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2019-06-01 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: Eleni M Rettig; Carole Fakhry; Russell K Hales; Flora Kisuule; Harry Quon; Ana P Kiess; Linda X Yin; Yuehan Zhang; Amanda L Blackford; M Bradley Drummond; Christine G Gourin; Wayne M Koch; David W Eisele; Gypsyamber D'Souza Journal: Head Neck Date: 2018-03-15 Impact factor: 3.147
Authors: Graham W Warren; James R Marshall; K Michael Cummings; Benjamin Toll; Ellen R Gritz; Alan Hutson; Seyedeh Dibaj; Roy Herbst; Carolyn Dresler Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2013-05 Impact factor: 15.609