BACKGROUND: Strategies to improve smoking cessation counseling in clinical settings are critical to supporting smokers' attempts to quit. This study evaluates the impact of adding 2 smoking-related vital sign questions in an electronic medical records system on identification, assessment, and counseling for patients who smoke: "Current smoker?" and "Plan to quit?" METHODS: Baseline data and data after intervention were collected through record review of 899 randomly selected patient visits across 3 outpatient clinics. RESULTS: From before to after intervention, identification of smokers increased 18% (from 71% to 84%; P<.001), and assessment for a plan to quit increased 100% (from 25.5% to 51%; P<.005). Among all smokers, cessation counseling increased 26% (from 23.6% to 29.8%; P=.41). Significantly more smokers who received the assessment for a plan to quit received cessation counseling (46% vs. 14%, P<.001). Regression analysis showed that patients receiving an assessment for plan to quit were 80% more likely to receive cessation counseling (OR 0.209; 95% CI, 0.095-0.456). CONCLUSIONS: Physician-documented counseling rates are significantly higher when patients are asked about smoking and assessed for a plan to quit. Two questions that ask about smoking status and assess plans to quit may provide prompts to increase the likelihood that patients who smoke receive cessation counseling.
BACKGROUND: Strategies to improve smoking cessation counseling in clinical settings are critical to supporting smokers' attempts to quit. This study evaluates the impact of adding 2 smoking-related vital sign questions in an electronic medical records system on identification, assessment, and counseling for patients who smoke: "Current smoker?" and "Plan to quit?" METHODS: Baseline data and data after intervention were collected through record review of 899 randomly selected patient visits across 3 outpatient clinics. RESULTS: From before to after intervention, identification of smokers increased 18% (from 71% to 84%; P<.001), and assessment for a plan to quit increased 100% (from 25.5% to 51%; P<.005). Among all smokers, cessation counseling increased 26% (from 23.6% to 29.8%; P=.41). Significantly more smokers who received the assessment for a plan to quit received cessation counseling (46% vs. 14%, P<.001). Regression analysis showed that patients receiving an assessment for plan to quit were 80% more likely to receive cessation counseling (OR 0.209; 95% CI, 0.095-0.456). CONCLUSIONS: Physician-documented counseling rates are significantly higher when patients are asked about smoking and assessed for a plan to quit. Two questions that ask about smoking status and assess plans to quit may provide prompts to increase the likelihood that patients who smoke receive cessation counseling.
Authors: Melanie M Taylor; Brigg Reilley; Scott Tulloch; Michelle Winscott; Anthony Dunnigan; Marie Russell; John T Redd Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Glen Morgan; Robert A Schnoll; Catherine M Alfano; Sarah E Evans; Adam Goldstein; Jamie Ostroff; Elyse Richelle Park; Linda Sarna; Lisa Sanderson Cox Journal: J Oncol Pract Date: 2011-05 Impact factor: 3.840
Authors: Scarlett L Gomez; Ellen T Chang; Sarah J Shema; Kari Fish; Jennette D Sison; Peggy Reynolds; Christelle Clément-Duchêne; Margaret R Wrensch; John L Wiencke; Heather A Wakelee Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2011-01-14 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Jason M Satterfield; Steven E Gregorich; Sara Kalkhoran; Paula J Lum; Jessica Bloome; Nicholas Alvarado; Ricardo F Muñoz; Maya Vijayaraghavan Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2018-06-18 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: David Fraser; Bruce A Christiansen; Robert Adsit; Timothy B Baker; Michael C Fiore Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2013-09 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Michael V Maciosek; Amy B LaFrance; Steven P Dehmer; Dana A McGree; Zack Xu; Thomas J Flottemesch; Leif I Solberg Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2017-01-06 Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Gina R Kruse; Yuchiao Chang; Jennifer H K Kelley; Jeffrey A Linder; Jonathan S Einbinder; Nancy A Rigotti Journal: Am J Manag Care Date: 2013-07 Impact factor: 2.229