BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Acute rejection remains a problem in renal transplantation. This study sought to determine the utility of a noninvasive cytokine assay in screening of acute rejection. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: In this observational cross-sectional study, 64 patients from two centers were recruited upon admission for allograft biopsy to investigate acute graft dysfunction. Blood was collected before biopsy and assayed for a panel of 21 cytokines secreted by PBMCs. Patients were classified as acute rejectors or nonrejectors according to a classification rule derived from an initial set of 32 patients (training cohort) and subsequently validated in the remaining patients (validation cohort). RESULTS: Although six cytokines (IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, IL-4, GM-CSF, and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1) distinguished acute rejectors in the training cohort, logistic regression modeling identified a single cytokine, IL-6, as the best predictor. In the validation cohort, IL-6 was consistently the most accurate cytokine (area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve, 0.85; P=0.006), whereas the application of a prespecified cutoff level, as determined from the training cohort, resulted in a sensitivity and specificity of 92% and 63%, respectively. Secondary analyses revealed a strong association between IL-6 levels and acute rejection after multivariate adjustment for clinical characteristics (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot study, the measurement of a single cytokine can exclude acute rejection with a sensitivity of 92% in renal transplant recipients presenting with acute graft dysfunction. Prospective studies are needed to determine the utility of this simple assay, particularly for low-risk or remote patients.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Acute rejection remains a problem in renal transplantation. This study sought to determine the utility of a noninvasive cytokine assay in screening of acute rejection. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: In this observational cross-sectional study, 64 patients from two centers were recruited upon admission for allograft biopsy to investigate acute graft dysfunction. Blood was collected before biopsy and assayed for a panel of 21 cytokines secreted by PBMCs. Patients were classified as acute rejectors or nonrejectors according to a classification rule derived from an initial set of 32 patients (training cohort) and subsequently validated in the remaining patients (validation cohort). RESULTS: Although six cytokines (IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, IL-4, GM-CSF, and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1) distinguished acute rejectors in the training cohort, logistic regression modeling identified a single cytokine, IL-6, as the best predictor. In the validation cohort, IL-6 was consistently the most accurate cytokine (area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve, 0.85; P=0.006), whereas the application of a prespecified cutoff level, as determined from the training cohort, resulted in a sensitivity and specificity of 92% and 63%, respectively. Secondary analyses revealed a strong association between IL-6 levels and acute rejection after multivariate adjustment for clinical characteristics (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot study, the measurement of a single cytokine can exclude acute rejection with a sensitivity of 92% in renal transplant recipients presenting with acute graft dysfunction. Prospective studies are needed to determine the utility of this simple assay, particularly for low-risk or remote patients.
Authors: Nader Najafian; Alan D Salama; Eugenia V Fedoseyeva; Gilles Benichou; Mohamed H Sayegh Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2002-01 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: L C Racusen; K Solez; R B Colvin; S M Bonsib; M C Castro; T Cavallo; B P Croker; A J Demetris; C B Drachenberg; A B Fogo; P Furness; L W Gaber; I W Gibson; D Glotz; J C Goldberg; J Grande; P F Halloran; H E Hansen; B Hartley; P J Hayry; C M Hill; E O Hoffman; L G Hunsicker; A S Lindblad; Y Yamaguchi Journal: Kidney Int Date: 1999-02 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: Alan S Maisel; Padma Krishnaswamy; Richard M Nowak; James McCord; Judd E Hollander; Philippe Duc; Torbjørn Omland; Alan B Storrow; William T Abraham; Alan H B Wu; Paul Clopton; Philippe G Steg; Arne Westheim; Catherine Wold Knudsen; Alberto Perez; Radmila Kazanegra; Howard C Herrmann; Peter A McCullough Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-07-18 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Marie Matignon; Ruchuang Ding; Darshana M Dadhania; Franco B Mueller; Choli Hartono; Catherine Snopkowski; Carol Li; John R Lee; Daniel Sjoberg; Surya V Seshan; Vijay K Sharma; Hua Yang; Bakr Nour; Andrew J Vickers; Manikkam Suthanthiran; Thangamani Muthukumar Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2014-03-07 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Meghan H Pearl; Jonathan Grotts; Maura Rossetti; Qiuheng Zhang; David W Gjertson; Patricia Weng; David Elashoff; Elaine F Reed; Eileen Tsai Chambers Journal: Kidney Int Rep Date: 2018-12-21