Literature DB >> 2249768

Using molecular markers to estimate quantitative trait locus parameters: power and genetic variances for unreplicated and replicated progeny.

S J Knapp1, W C Bridges.   

Abstract

Many of the progeny types used to estimate quantitative trait locus (QTL) parameters can be replicated, e.g., recombinant inbred, doubled haploid, and F3 lines. These parameters are estimated using molecular markers or QTL genotypes estimated from molecular markers as independent variables. Experiment designs for replicated progeny are functions of the number of replications per line (r) and the number of replications per QTL genotype (n). The value of n is determined by the size of the progeny population (N), the progeny type, and the number of simultaneously estimated QTL parameters (q - 1). Power for testing hypotheses about means of QTL genotypes is increased by increasing r and n, but the effects of these factors have not been quantified. In this paper, we describe how power is affected by r, n, and other factors. The genetic variance between lines nested in QTL genotypes (sigma 2n:q) is the fraction of the genetic variance between lines (sigma 2n) which is not explained by simultaneously estimated intralocus and interlocus QTL parameters (phi 2Q); thus, sigma 2n:q = sigma 2n - phi 2Q. If sigma 2n:q not equal to 0, then power is not efficiently increased by increasing r and is maximized by maximizing n and using r = 1; however, if sigma 2n:q = 0, then r and n affect power equally and power is efficiently increased by increasing r and is maximized by maximizing N.r. Increasing n efficiently increases power for a wide range of values of sigma 2n:q.sigma 2n:q = 0 when the genetic variance between lines is fully explained by QTL parameters (sigma 2n = phi 2Q).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2249768      PMCID: PMC1204230     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  2 in total

1.  Mapping mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using RFLP linkage maps.

Authors:  E S Lander; D Botstein
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Maximum likelihood techniques for the mapping and analysis of quantitative trait loci with the aid of genetic markers.

Authors:  J I Weller
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 2.571

  2 in total
  45 in total

1.  Quantitative trait locus mapping based on resampling in a vast maize testcross experiment and its relevance to quantitative genetics for complex traits.

Authors:  Chris C Schön; H Friedrich Utz; Susanne Groh; Bernd Truberg; Steve Openshaw; Albrecht E Melchinger
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Use of trial clustering to study QTL x environment effects for grain yield and related traits in maize.

Authors:  Laurence Moreau; Alain Charcosset; André Gallais
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2004-11-12       Impact factor: 5.699

3.  Quantitative trait locus analysis using recombinant inbred intercrosses: theoretical and empirical considerations.

Authors:  Fei Zou; Jonathan A L Gelfond; David C Airey; Lu Lu; Kenneth F Manly; Robert W Williams; David W Threadgill
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-05-06       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Quantitative trait mapping in a diallel cross of recombinant inbred lines.

Authors:  Shirng-Wern Tsaih; Lu Lu; David C Airey; Robert W Williams; Gary A Churchill
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.957

5.  Assessing the significance of quantitative trait loci in replicable mapping populations.

Authors:  Fei Zou; Zongli Xu; Todd Vision
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-08-03       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Mapping quantitative trait loci using the experimental designs of recombinant inbred populations.

Authors:  Chen-Hung Kao
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Amplified fragment length polymorphism mapping of quantitative trait loci for malaria parasite susceptibility in the yellow fever mosquito Aedes aegypti.

Authors:  Daibin Zhong; David M Menge; Emmanuel A Temu; Hong Chen; Guiyun Yan
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Optimizing the allocation of resources for genomic selection in one breeding cycle.

Authors:  Christian Riedelsheimer; Albrecht E Melchinger
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 5.699

9.  Genetic and agronomic assessment of cob traits in corn under low and normal nitrogen management conditions.

Authors:  Constantin Jansen; Yongzhong Zhang; Hongjun Liu; Pedro J Gonzalez-Portilla; Nick Lauter; Bharath Kumar; Ignacio Trucillo-Silva; Juan Pablo San Martin; Michael Lee; Kevin Simcox; Jeff Schussler; Kanwarpal Dhugga; Thomas Lübberstedt
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 5.699

10.  Factors affecting accuracy from genomic selection in populations derived from multiple inbred lines: a Barley case study.

Authors:  Shengqiang Zhong; Jack C M Dekkers; Rohan L Fernando; Jean-Luc Jannink
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.