Literature DB >> 2249754

A defect in mismatch repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae stimulates ectopic recombination between homeologous genes by an excision repair dependent process.

A M Bailis1, R Rothstein.   

Abstract

Null mutations in three recombination and DNA repair genes were studied to determine their effects on mitotic recombination between the duplicate AdoMet (S-adenosylmethionine) synthetase genes (SAM1 and SAM2) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. SAM1 and SAM2, located on chromosomes XII and IV, respectively, encode functionally equivalent although differentially regulated AdoMet synthetases. These similar but not identical (homeologous) genes are 83% homologous at the nucleotide level and this identity is limited solely to the coding regions of the genes. Single frameshift mutations were introduced into the 5' end of SAM1 and the 3' end of SAM2 by restriction site ablation. The sequences surrounding these mutations differ significantly in their degree of homology to the corresponding area of the other gene. Mitotic ectopic recombination between the mutant sam genes occurs at a rate of 8.4 x 10(-9) in a wild-type genetic background. Gene conversion of the marker within the region of greater sequence homology occurs 20-fold more frequently than conversion of the marker within the region of relative sequence diversity. The relative orientation of the two genes prevents the recovery of translocations. Mitotic recombination between the sam genes is completely dependent on the DNA repair and recombination gene RAD52. A mutation in PMS1, a mismatch repair gene, causes a 4.5-fold increase in the rate of ectopic recombination. RAD1, an excision repair gene, is required to observe this increased rate of ectopic conversion. In addition, RAD1 is involved in modulating the pattern of coconversion during recombination between the homeologous sam genes. These results suggest that interactions between mismatch repair, excision repair and recombinational repair functions are involved in determining the ectopic gene conversion frequency between the sam genes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2249754      PMCID: PMC1204210     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  44 in total

1.  Yeast intrachromosomal recombination: long gene conversion tracts are preferentially associated with reciprocal exchange and require the RAD1 and RAD3 gene products.

Authors:  A Aguilera; H L Klein
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  The barrier to recombination between Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium is disrupted in mismatch-repair mutants.

Authors:  C Rayssiguier; D S Thaler; M Radman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1989-11-23       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Different types of recombination events are controlled by the RAD1 and RAD52 genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  H L Klein
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Replacement of chromosome segments with altered DNA sequences constructed in vitro.

Authors:  S Scherer; R W Davis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Dependence of intrachromosomal recombination in mammalian cells on uninterrupted homology.

Authors:  A S Waldman; R M Liskay
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  Meiotic roles of crossing-over and of gene conversion.

Authors:  A T Carpenter
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  1984

7.  A ten-minute DNA preparation from yeast efficiently releases autonomous plasmids for transformation of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  C S Hoffman; F Winston
Journal:  Gene       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.688

8.  Meiotic gene conversion mutants in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. I. Isolation and characterization of pms1-1 and pms1-2.

Authors:  M S Williamson; J C Game; S Fogel
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Homothallic mating type switching generates lethal chromosome breaks in rad52 strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  B Weiffenbach; J E Haber
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  Gene conversion between duplicated genetic elements in yeast.

Authors:  J A Jackson; G R Fink
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1981-07-23       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  62 in total

Review 1.  Genetic and epigenetic interactions in allopolyploid plants.

Authors:  L Comai
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.076

2.  Sister chromatids are preferred over homologs as substrates for recombinational repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  L C Kadyk; L H Hartwell
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Molecular population genetics of the beta-esterase gene cluster of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Evgeniy S Balakirev; Francisco J Ayala
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.166

4.  Identification of a chicken RAD52 homologue suggests conservation of the RAD52 recombination pathway throughout the evolution of higher eukaryotes.

Authors:  O Y Bezzubova; H Schmidt; K Ostermann; W D Heyer; J M Buerstedde
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1993-12-25       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Interaction of excision repair gene products and mitotic recombination functions in yeast.

Authors:  B A Montelone; B C Liang-Chong
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 3.886

6.  The effects of mismatch repair and RAD1 genes on interchromosomal crossover recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Ainsley Nicholson; Rebecca M Fabbri; Jason W Reeves; Gray F Crouse
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-04-02       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Multiple pathways for homologous recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  A J Rattray; L S Symington
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Multiple recombination pathways for sister chromatid exchange in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: role of RAD1 and the RAD52 epistasis group genes.

Authors:  Zheng Dong; Michael Fasullo
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Effects of terminal nonhomology and homeology on double-strand-break-induced gene conversion tract directionality.

Authors:  H H Nelson; D B Sweetser; J A Nickoloff
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  Multiple transcriptional activation complexes tether the yeast activator Met4 to DNA.

Authors:  P L Blaiseau; D Thomas
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1998-11-02       Impact factor: 11.598

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.